Liang Long's "Crazy Alien" caused controversy, and film critics praised the audience for not understanding it, who should listen to?
Before there was "Actors Please Take Place", and now there is a "Director Please Advise", seeing the invited guest lineup makes the audience feel speechless. Wang Zhonglei's Qianjin Wang Wenye, Bi Zhifei, who is famous for "touching porcelain", and many non-professional directors and cross-border directors have come to the show to show their directing talents. But is the director that good? Do the audience pay?
The latest episode of "Director's Advice" has caused a huge controversy, and this controversy comes from the remake of Liang Long, the lead singer of the second-hand Rose, "Crazy Alien". We know that the original "Crazy Alien" is a sci-fi comedy starring Huang Bo, Shen Teng and others, while Liang Long's remake has completely changed the style.
Liang Long's works are mainly black and white, and are presented in the form of similar silent films, and the eerie and absurd scenes make the audience scream that they can't understand it. Before the movie was finished, it was forced to stop broadcasting halfway, because the support rate of the live audience was lower than expected, so it could only be forced to stop broadcasting.
Many viewers said that they could not understand what Liang Long wanted to express through the film, but film critics spoke highly of Liang Long's work and regretted not watching the entire film. There was a very fierce collision of opinions between the audience and the film critics.
Some viewers said that after all, this is a competitive program, if you watch it quietly but still can't understand it, and miss the time of voting, it is also unfair for other groups, and the choice button pause, not for the director or actor, just can't understand what the work wants to express.
Screenwriters Wei Xiao and Yuan Zizi praised Liang Long and his works, believing that his works were deep and worth pondering, and that a musician had an advantage in being a director.
Some viewers believe that some commentators give people the feeling of being "pretentious and profound", producer Zhao Wendi said that film critics are not pretending to be profound, they are using their industry knowledge and experience to tell the audience what is the idea of this film, where is good, film critics are using their own experience to guide the audience and help the audience better understand a work.
However, for his statement, some viewers expressed different views, he believes that after listening to the so-called professional appreciation of film critics and then going to see the movie, the film is even a failure. It's like people eating sugar cane, and you chew it a second time after people eat it, is it still meaningful?
At this point, due to the problem of Liang Long's remake of "Crazy Alien", another new question has been extended, that is, does the audience need to judge the quality of the film through film critics?
In this regard, the views of netizens are not very consistent. In addition to his own professional knowledge and experience, film critics also have personal preferences, and if they mix personal preferences to look at the quality of a movie, it is not objective in itself, and it is not necessarily completely correct.
Film and television dramas are made for the majority of audiences to see, perhaps the audience may not be able to fully understand a work, or because of the limitations of the times and other special reasons, resulting in "pearl dust", but the works that can be recognized by the broad masses of the people are basically good works.
Everyone has their own ideas, not necessarily your ideas are right, and since the director has chosen his own shooting style and subject matter, he should be prepared not to be understood and accepted by the audience. Film critics are also audiences in a way, but they have more professionalism and more experience than ordinary audiences, but they may not be able to represent the entire audience as good or bad.
In general, Liang Long's "Crazy Alien" still has his merits, if it is not because of the program format, until the film is all played, there may be different evaluations. As the lead actor of the film, Pan Binlong unswervingly chose Liang Long from the beginning, saying that even if he did not speak and did not show his face, he was successfully "abused" in the end, and a shot was filmed at least 10 times.
The "madness" of the director and actor completed this other "Crazy Alien", but it received such a completely different evaluation. So what do you think of Liang Long's work? Should the audience listen to the evaluation of film critics to judge the quality of the work?
【The image comes from the Internet, if there is infringement, delete it immediately】
#梁龙导演疯狂的外星人停播 #