laitimes

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

Self-defense counterattack against Vietnam

It is of great significance to the development of various fields in modern China, and the victory in this war has created a relatively peaceful external environment for Our country to develop its own economy.

If at that time Vietnam had not heeded the encouragement of the Soviet Union on the Chinese border

"Troublesome"

, and in the time our country raised

Peaceful representations

After the recommendation is accepted, then

This war could have been avoided

。 However, in the international environment and the transformation of Sino-Soviet-Vietnamese-US relations, the war finally officially began.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

Because each country is in a different position, this has led to different descriptions of this counterattack against Vietnam when compiling history textbooks, so you know

Vietnam, Russia and Japan

How do textbooks describe this war?

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

Vietnamese textbooks in the war of self-defense against Vietnam

Vietnam, as the person at the time of this war, the country's resentment against this war is very obvious. In describing the war, they portrayed China as an aggressor.

As everyone knows

The self-defense counterattack against Vietnam lasted only nearly a month

When it was about to hit Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam, our country believed that the lessons it should have been taught were enough, so it resolutely chose to return to China, but in the process of returning to China, our country recovered almost all the materials that had aided Vietnam, and demolished some equipment that could not be taken away, as well as factories and other buildings that had helped Vietnam build.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

This is done first because Vietnam has done something to harm China, China is not a "virgin", and will not let these resources stay in Vietnam so that they have the capital to attack China again; second, it is to weaken Vietnam's basic strength as much as possible.

Avoid a comeback in this country with the resources provided by our country.

Perhaps it was precisely because of this approach adopted by the Chinese People's Liberation Army forces that Vietnam defined the Sino-Vietnamese war as a war

"Our country wants to conquer Vietnam and plunder resources to meet domestic needs."

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

However, in the description, Vietnam completely erased the record of its own annexation of China's border territories, creating several bloody incidents, and even elaborated on the final outcome of the war

"The Vietnamese army 'repelled' the Chinese army, and the Chinese army 'fell in love' and returned home"

It's a bit of a distortion of the facts.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

Russian textbooks in the war of self-defense against Vietnam

Russia, as a country that inherits a large inheritance of the former Soviet Union, although it is inextricably linked to the former Soviet Union, we cannot confuse the two countries. At first, in order to expand its influence in the Asian region and the deterioration of Sino-Soviet relations, the Soviet Union directly instigated Vietnam to use troops against China in order to curb China's development.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

At that time, the Soviet Union had a large number of troops near the northern border of our country, originally hoping to obtain some benefits from China through the hand of Vietnam, but because Sino-US relations were heating up rapidly at that time, the United States had warned the Soviet Union not to destroy the current situation, coupled with China's strength did make the Soviet Union a little jealous, in short, for various reasons, the Soviet Union did not finally take a shot at China, and later when Vietnam fell into decline,

The Soviet Union only gave equipment and tactical assistance, and did not directly send troops to help.

Later, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia became the main heir of the former Soviet Union, and the country inherited many development problems of the former Soviet Union while inheriting the inheritance, which led to the initial development of Russia was very difficult.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

In order to ensure that its country can successfully survive and develop under the pressure of the United States, Russia began to repair relations with China very seriously, and it is precisely because of this that when revising the history of the "war of counterattack against Vietnam", Russia did not continue the Soviet Union's "pro-Vietnamese and anti-China" attitude, but described the war from an objective and fair standpoint as much as possible.

The country not only described the obvious gap in strength between China and Vietnam, but also affirmed the correctness and necessity of China's self-defense counterattack against Vietnam, and basically restored the elaboration of various parts of the details.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

A self-defense counterattack against Vietnam in Japanese textbooks

As for Japan, it continues its tradition in textbooks .

I can say whatever I want.

Nowadays, when we mention Japanese history textbooks, people must think of Japan's attitude of never admitting to committing numerous crimes in China.

During World War II, after the Japanese invaded China, they caused several massacres in China that shocked China and foreign countries, and the crimes they committed can be said to be "uncountable". Later, because it was difficult for Japan to continue the war, and the atomic bomb of the United States did cause a clear deterrent to Japan, which made Japan finally choose unconditional surrender. But after that,

Japan not only advertises itself internationally as a victim of the atomic bomb, but also refuses to acknowledge what it has done.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

It is precisely because there is a "bloody sea and deep hatred" between the country and China, and the country is always trying to smear China, so when describing the "counterattack war against Vietnam", Japan did not give a very clear position, and also used the "Spring and Autumn Brushwork" to obscure the reasons for China's counterattack war

The focus is on the severe damage and casualties caused by the Chinese People's Liberation Army to Vietnam.

Although the country is not as blunt as Vietnam, we can see from its handling of this matter that Japan has always been malicious towards China. Of course, that's right

"Right and wrong are in oneself, reputation is destroyed by others, gains and losses do not matter"

It is clear what Kind of Clear-eyed People really are in China, and it is difficult to shake China's foundation now with a single or two malicious slanders.

How do Vietnamese, Russian, and Japanese textbooks describe the war?

Read on