Willow "Good" People and "Malicious Return"

The topic of Liu's "good" people has been boiling on the Internet for nearly half a year, while the mainstream media has watched the fire from the other side, indifferent, and acted as a melon-eating masses. As soon as the topic of "malicious return to the hometown" came out, it smelled the wind and rose up, rushing up, and mobilizing the masses. Why? Is the loss of state-owned assets insignificant? Pension nearly 100 million a ride on the dust of course? Is it trivial to send directly to the US military computer in the context of sino-US relations? On the occasion of the centenary celebration, Didi's urgent exit listing does not matter? Why not care about these thought-provoking topics and let them stop at the streets? A sentence of "malicious return" is so poured out of the nest and fully opened fire? Hopefully, this is not the power of capital at work! A healthy-thinking person, no matter where he is in what position, the topic is within the normal range, but the perspective of considering the problem is different. It can be commented on, but there is no need to "maliciously" judge, including a sentence of "malicious return", which does not necessarily refer to the returning public, but only refers to the possible individual "malicious returnees", is there any warning significance? All in all, I hope not to favor one over the other, and I do not want to bias public opinion.