Obviously, he has called the money to the 4S shop, but he only got the car keys, wanted to pick up the car, but the merchant stopped and did not let him leave, and said that they did not receive the car purchase price, only received a deposit of 5,000 yuan? The two female car owners in Guizhou encountered big trouble when buying a car, and each of them paid more than 100,000 yuan to buy a car, but the money did not go.
Ms. Zou bought a car with her colleagues, and the vice president of the 4S store received them that day, and later arranged a sales consultant for them. Ms. Zou and her colleagues want to buy Nissan Tianlai. After reading it, they felt that the price of the vehicle and the configuration were acceptable to themselves, so each person paid a deposit of 5,000 yuan, and signed a car purchase contract, agreeing on the time to pay the down payment.
After returning home, Ms. Zou and her colleagues immediately contacted the sales consultant and paid more than 200,000 yuan for the car. At that time, the sales consultant sent her a collection code, and Ms. Zou found that this collection code was different from the one in the store at that time, so she asked about the sales. Sales said that the store upgraded, the two-dimensional code can not receive money, use this can be. Seeing that the beneficiary was the name of the shop where the car was bought, Ms. Zou did not think much about it and transferred the money.
A few days later, Ms. Zou and her friend happily came to the store to pick up the car, and the sales consultant handed Ms. Zou the keys to the two cars and told them to wait in the hall for ten minutes, and he went to help them print the temporary license plates. Ms. Zou and her colleagues waited in the hall, but after waiting for half an hour, the other party did not appear.
Ms. Zou felt that something was not right, so she called the sales consultant, but found that the other party was turned off. Unable to contact each other, they went to the leader of the 4S store, at which point they found out that they had been deceived. The person in charge of the store told them that they had not received payment for the car on the company's account.
Hearing each other's words, Ms. Zou and her colleagues were very shocked, but they felt that it was the manager of the store who let the sales receive themselves, and he told himself that the follow-up things could be docked with the sales consultant, and now that the other party had taken the money away, the store should give itself a statement. But they came several times, the other side did not give a reply, in desperation they reported to the police and found the media.
How did the merchant respond to this?
The salesperson was indeed an employee in the store, and they would certainly be responsible for it, but they would have to follow the process. Now the salesman has gone to the public security bureau to turn himself in, but the purchase price is missing, and they have to wait for the results of the police. Now that the money has not been seen, they cannot let Ms. Zou drive the car away.
But Ms. Zou felt that the salesman was the clerk in the store, and they also let themselves connect with the sales, and the merchant should find a sales and should not prevent them from picking up the car. If not, refund the money.
Merchants said that before the matter is settled, they can only go through legal procedures and wait for the court to deal with it. If the court holds them liable, they will certainly be liable.
The sales consultant forged the collection code and absconded the money, which should be borne by the merchant, and the other party should not prevent the owner from picking up the car. Because when the owner goes through the car purchase procedures, the sales are in the company, and the person in charge of the company lets the owner connect with him.
【The picture in this article comes from the network, if there is infringement, please contact to delete】