The focus of salary cuts in administrative institutions should be to eliminate unreasonable subsidies
At present, many administrative institutions are working to reduce wages, which is a great thing. However, I think that a proportional salary cut is not enough, and more important than a proportional salary reduction is the elimination of unreasonable subsidies.
First, according to the policy, the wages of employees of administrative institutions are not high, such as college students who have just joined the work, the grade salary plus living allowance, the exemption reaches about 3,000 yuan, after deducting a few hundred yuan of social security and medical insurance premiums, only more than 2,000 yuan remains, much lower than the wages of migrant workers; The salary of a section-level civil servant who has worked for about 10 years is only about 4,000 yuan, which is only equivalent to the salary of ordinary migrant workers working part-time, far from the salary of skilled workers.
Why only the salary of the grade and the subsistence allowance? Because the salary of grade and grade is the statutory wage, and the living allowance is a factor in rising prices, these three should be defined as basic wages, whether in economically developed areas or poor areas, must be paid; Subsidies and bonuses in other areas can fluctuate according to the local financial situation.
Second, the number of subsidies for administrative institutions is too large and chaotic, and the operation is too flexible.
What is called too flexible in operation, that is: where there is no money, it can be sent less or not; Where there is money, it can be distributed; Where there is a lot of money, you can send more hair, and you can also play the edge ball to make a big hair.
What is a lot of chaos? For example, various subsidies, in addition to technical subsidies according to the type of work, common project subsidies are also numerous, some of which are a bit surprising. For example, attendance allowance, as the name implies, is attendance (doing things), there is a subsidy. So, on the other hand, do civil servants not necessarily have to be present (to do things)? Another example is the "Double Civilization Goal Award", each completed or overcompleted work task is awarded one month's salary, some units do a good job, complete more than 10 target tasks, and the bonus is higher than the annual salary! "13 salary" is also not scientific, as long as the assessment reaches the "pass" level, 13 salary will be paid, which virtually reduces the image of civil servants, can it be understood that civil servants do not have to pass, failing is just not getting 13 salaries.
Third, subsidies for technical posts in administrative institutions are very chaotic:
-- Public security cadres and other allowances are more than 30% higher than the income of ordinary civil servants;
-- The staff of the Political and Legal Affairs Committee and the Bureau of Justice shall receive a political and legal subsidy of about 1,200 yuan per person;
-- Post officials of procuratorates and courts have a monthly allowance of about 3,000 yuan, and non-post personnel also have a subsidy of 1,000~2,000 yuan;
-- Subsidy for those engaged in petition work;
-- There is a subsidy for discipline inspection and supervision work, which is about 1,200 yuan per person per month;
- Subsidy for the Emergency Management Agency to engage in safety work;
-- Other subsidies for confidentiality work and auditing work;
- The salary of professional titles in the education system is also relatively chaotic;
- The subsidy for working in Zhenzhen will be increased from 800 yuan per person per month in 2022 to 1,200 yuan per person per month in 2023;
⋯⋯
In short, the wages of administrative institutions are chaotically in terms of subsidies and subsidies. A good regulation of allowances and subsidies is more meaningful than a proportional salary cut.
