The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Introduction:
The US Indo-Pacific Command issued a statement on the 3rd, pointing out that the US destroyer "Zhong Yun" and the Canadian frigate "Montreal" were "accelerated and advanced close interception" by the PLA "Suzhou" 052D missile destroyer during their passage through the Taiwan Strait. The incident has sparked controversy over whether the Taiwan Strait is international waters. However, the answer to this question involves not only geographical and legal aspects, but also national sovereignty, historical factors, and security considerations. This article will explore this complex issue in depth.
China's claim that the Taiwan Strait is the basis for "internal waters"
China's firm assertion that the Taiwan Strait belongs to its internal waters is based on multiple reasons. First, China claims sovereignty over Taiwan and regards the Taiwan Strait as part of the Taiwan Island, so it should also fall under China's sovereignty and jurisdiction. China stressed that it does not recognize Taiwan's undetermined status and does not accept the internationalization of the Taiwan Strait.
Second, China can claim territorial sea rights of 12 nautical miles and contiguous zone rights of 24 nautical miles. Although the Taiwan Strait is within 70 nautical miles of its narrowest point, within that extent China can define it as territorial sea or contiguous zone and thus claim jurisdiction.
Third, historical factors also play an important role in China's claims. China's view that the Taiwan Strait is part of China's historic waters is one of the historical bases for its internal water claims and cannot be challenged.
Security considerations have also driven China's position on internal waters. Defining the Taiwan Strait as international waters will allow foreign military ships to frequently navigate and operate there, directly threatening China's strategic security. This is also a key factor in China's adherence to its internal waters claims and restrictions on foreign warships sailing in the region.
The first case effect is another reason why China insists on internal waters. Accepting the Taiwan Strait as international waters would set an unfavorable precedent for claims to other security-related straits, prompting China to take a tough stance on the issue.
In addition, nationalist sentiment runs through China's Taiwan Strait policy. This issue concerns China's territorial integrity and sovereignty, and is closely related to the feelings and expectations of the Chinese people. The Chinese government has taken a firm stance on this issue, which is also supported by public opinion.
The United States considers the Taiwan Strait to be the basis for international waters
The United States holds that the Taiwan Strait is international waters with its basis and arguments. First, geographically, the Taiwan Strait, while 70 nautical miles wide at its narrowest point, goes beyond the 12-nautical-mile territorial sea and 24-nautical-mile contiguous zone that China might claim. Therefore, the United States believes that the Taiwan Strait is not under China's jurisdiction but should be international waters.
Secondly, the Taiwan Strait has long been used for international navigation, and a large number of foreign ships pass through it every year. If it were defined as China's internal waters, it would affect freedom of navigation and violate international law. The United States insists on the designation of international waters to preserve navigational rights.
Third, recognizing the Taiwan Strait as international waters is in the strategic interests of the United States and is conducive to its military operations. If it is defined as internal waters, it will restrict US military activities in the region and be detrimental to the strategic layout of the United States in the Western Pacific.
Fourth, the ownership of the Taiwan Strait will serve as an important precedent to affect other important shipping lanes. The United States does not want to see it classified as China's internal water to avoid an adverse "first case effect."
Finally, for a long time, the Taiwan Strait has actually been in the status quo of "one China, each with its own expressions", and the United States has acquiesced to this status quo to a certain extent. Therefore, the United States advocates defining its status quo as a legal status, that is, international waters.
China's internal water propositions are consistent with practical actions
It is worth noting that despite China's insistence on internal waters, this does not threaten the freedom of navigation of the civilian and commercial vessels involved. China has maintained control over the Taiwan Strait, ensuring safe passage and providing corresponding navigation guidance to the international community. This reflects China's cautious approach to the balance between international law and freedom of international navigation.
At the same time, China also emphasized the legitimacy and historical inheritance of its position. This means that China's internal water claims were not made overnight, but based on long-term historical and geopolitical factors. This has also made China's position widely supported at home.
conclusion
The internationalization of the Taiwan Strait involves both international law, geography and geography
It involves many aspects such as national sovereignty, historical traditions and strategic security. The United States asserts the Taiwan Strait as international waters to safeguard freedom of navigation and support its military strategy, while China adheres to its position on internal waters and emphasizes sovereignty and security. This complex controversy cannot be ignored because it affects regional and international security, as well as has far-reaching implications in international relations.
In the face of this problem, countries need to resolve their differences through dialogue and consultation. The international community should encourage all parties to exercise restraint and refrain from unilateral actions that would escalate tensions. Respect for international law, the sovereignty of all countries and freedom of navigation are the keys to maintaining peace and stability. At the same time, historical factors and geopolitical realities should also be taken seriously to find workable solutions.
In this dispute, States must carefully weigh their interests and responsibilities. Maintaining regional stability and peace requires the joint efforts of all parties to build bridges of trust and cooperation. The issue of the Taiwan Strait concerns not only Taiwan, China and the United States, but the entire international community. States should address this issue responsibly in order to promote shared prosperity and peace.
Finally, the resolution of this dispute will take time, patience and wisdom. Through open dialogue and respect for the interests of all parties, the international community is expected to find a sustainable solution to maintain regional and global peace and stability.
Revelation:
The article touched on the dispute between the United States and China in the Taiwan Strait and their position on sovereignty over the water. From this question, we can draw several important revelations and truths:
Geographical factors matter: Geographical factors play an important role in international disputes. Claims to specific maritime areas between different countries are often based on geographical location and characteristics. Understanding the geographical context is essential to understanding the causes of the dispute.
Role of international law: International law plays a key role in defining the rules governing international waters and territorial seas. Sovereignty disputes between different countries often involve the interpretation and application of international law, so understanding the relevant provisions of international law is essential to resolve disputes.
Interests and security: A country's interests and security considerations often influence its claim to sovereignty over disputed areas. In the case of the Taiwan Strait, both the United States and China have linked their sovereignty claims to national interests and security concerns.
The Nationalist Factor: Nationalist sentiment also plays an important role in international disputes. The ethnic and historical sentiments of disputed regions often influence a country's foreign policy and public opinion.
Tough stance is not necessarily unreasonable: Although the United States and China have taken a tough stance on the Taiwan Strait, this does not mean that either side is unreasonable. International disputes are usually complex and diverse, with different positions and perspectives, and the resolution of these disputes requires in-depth dialogue and negotiation.
Summary:
In summary, the dispute over international waters in the Taiwan Strait involves a variety of factors, including geography, international law, interests, security, and nationalism. The United States claims that it is international waters to safeguard freedom of navigation and strategic interests, while China claims that it is internal waters, based on sovereignty claims, historical factors and security considerations. This controversy reflects the complexity and diversity of disputes in international relations.
The settlement of such disputes requires in-depth dialogue and negotiation among all parties, respect for international law and rules and consideration of the legitimate concerns of States. In the era of globalization, the maintenance of peace, stability and freedom of navigation in international waters is of paramount importance to all countries. The international community should encourage all parties to adopt peaceful settlement of disputes in order to maintain regional and global peace and prosperity. In dealing with similar disputes, international law and the common interests of the international community should be fully respected in order to achieve a fair and lasting solution to the dispute.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.