The "ghost name" incident once again became the focus of public opinion, and this absurd drama was staged in Lianyungang again. The market management has done a ridiculous approach: turning a blind eye to the vendors who are short of pounds and pounds, but chasing down the whistleblowers who reveal the truth and forcing them to delete the videos. Which one is this farce sung about?
Just as the authoritative media pointed out sharply, this dramatic scene vividly portrays the despicable behavior of both the shortage and the ugly face of the market manager. Driven by profits, conscience is abandoned, morality is degraded, laws are flouted, and the interests of consumers are wantonly trampled on.
In recent years, "ghost name" incidents have frequently broken out across the country, and anti-counterfeiters have emerged in an endless stream. They risk their lives to expose the shady scenes of the lack of pounds and pounds, but they are often retaliated against, which is not uncommon.
From vegetable markets to express goods, from seafood products to fresh chickens and live fish, from electricity meters to gas and water meters, almost all industries are covered. "Ghost names" are everywhere and pervasive. The progress of science and technology is supposed to benefit mankind, but it is used by people with ulterior motives to create highly concealed cheating tools.
In the face of such a rampant phenomenon of "ghost names", the market management department seems indifferent. It's not that they can't manage it, but they don't want to manage it, and some managers even collude with counterfeiters to harm consumers.
And what happened to the whistleblower is even more outrageous. They defend justice and expose shady scenes, only to be met with reprisals and even threats to their lives. This phenomenon is not only the connivance of counterfeiters, but also the ridicule of managers.
The existence of the phenomenon of "ghost name" is, in the final analysis, a moral degradation, a low character and a company's personality, and a festering scar of the social atmosphere. It not only harms the interests of consumers, but also corrodes the foundation of social integrity.
The frequent outbreak of "ghost name" incidents also reflects deeper social problems: lack of supervision, lax laws, and insufficient punishment. These problems provide opportunities for criminals.
The phenomenon of "ghost name" not only directly harms the interests of consumers, but also may have far-reaching negative impacts. It undermines market order, shakes social integrity, and may even trigger a broader crisis of confidence.
To eradicate the "ghost name", it is far from enough to rely on the people's spontaneous reporting. We need sound laws and regulations, strict law enforcement and supervision, and the joint efforts of the whole society. Only by establishing a strong institutional guarantee can we fundamentally eradicate this black sheep.