There is such a sentence circulating on the Internet: "Virtue is a high-quality product, no virtue is a waste product, virtue is a semi-finished product, and a talent without virtue is a dangerous product." ”
Gambling king Stanley Ho once said such a deafening sentence: "Most of the upper class are low-class people, and most of the low-class people are high-ranking people." It is necessary to use obscene means to enter the upper class, and then use the upper means to do obscene things. ”
People in the upper class and people with high education are not as glamorous as we see, they are actually the most exquisite "egoists", their oppression of the bottom people is the most cruel and ruthless, and just like "boiled frogs in warm water", people feel without pain, this is mainly because they are good at packaging themselves and have the ability to package themselves!
It can be seen from this that which one do you think is more important in evaluating a person from the two aspects of "talent" and "virtue"?
Some people believe that even if people can't make great contributions to society, they should leave some yin virtue for future generations, so "virtue" is more important.
And some people believe that when people are alive, they should shine and show their talents, so "talent" is more important.
In fact, for this issue, the public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable. However, in any case, there is one thing that we must not forget, that is, people who do not have "virtue" will eventually become a hidden danger to society.
Someone once made such an analysis, the most harmful, that is, "talented but not virtuous" people, they have no bottom line, they can use their own knowledge to exploit the loopholes of the law, so that they can avoid punishment, which is terrifying, enough to cause great harm to a certain field.
And what about those who have no talent and no virtue? They may not have a good character, but they have no talent, and their understanding of things is not deep enough, even if they are not virtuous, they cannot make much waves.
Therefore, if a person with a high "education" lacks the corresponding virtues, then he will take the behavior of "harming others and benefiting himself" to the extreme, and be a refined egoist.
In ancient times, Confucianism put "virtue" in the first place in the world. Nowadays, only the emphasis is on learning "culture", not on learning to be a person.
Under the examination-oriented education system, today's schools only pay attention to students' scores and only teach students to learn the stereotypical book culture, but they forget to teach students the truth of life.
Highly educated "talents" who are "talented but not virtuous" do a bad deed and cause dozens or hundreds of times more harm to society than ordinary people.
Why is it said that talented people without virtue can do "bad things" to the extreme? This is because people who have little culture, they often rely on brute force to do bad things, and they are all clear. Talented and virtuous people, they like to "go under the knife" behind their backs, they are often scheming, tricky, and planning people, and such people are ruthless when they make a move, putting people to death.
To emphasize, we are not saying that "highly educated" people are necessarily bad people who "harm others and benefit themselves", but that without the support of "virtue", highly educated talents will often be more terrible than ordinary people.
I hope that in the future society, people will not only read the stereotyped books with "words", but also read the books of life without words. Only when self-cultivation and self-cultivation are done well, can we truly pave the way for "Qi family governing the country and leveling the world".