Sentence / Ki Ling
Editor/Magpie
The news of Peking University's independent enrollment has sparked a discussion among netizens about the bonus point policy for special athletes, should it be supported or questioned? Has Li Xueqin's identity been fraudulently used, or is there a real level of professionalism? Let's take a look!
Peking University's independent enrollment was exposed
Recently, netizens exposed the information of Peking University's independent enrollment, which is that a student with independent enrollment has previously obtained the status of a second-level swimming athlete, so when Peking University independently enrolls students, he can enjoy the bonus policy of special athletes.
As soon as this news came out, it sparked heated discussions among netizens, because second-level swimming athletes need to have a certain professional level to achieve, and according to the regulations of Peking University's independent enrollment, special athletes can get extra points through a simple test.
Netizens broke the news that the student's name is Li Xueqin, she once obtained the qualification of a second-level swimming athlete in 2007, and represented Beijing in swimming competitions many times in the following years, and is a swimmer with representative experience.
And according to the revelations, the reason why Li Xueqin received the admission discount for Peking University's independent enrollment is also based on her previous status as a second-level swimming athlete.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately aroused netizens' doubts about Peking University's independent enrollment, and many netizens believed that the regulations on Peking University's independent enrollment were obviously tailored for these rich second generations and official second generations, while it was difficult for ordinary students to pass.
Peking University's independent enrollment has become the goal that many students' parents and students strive for, but if it is really as said in the news, then Peking University's independent enrollment has become an improper means to help those rich second generations and official second generations who do not need help.
And when many netizens speculated whether Li Xueqin was still a master swimmer before, it also triggered a lot of discussions about academic integrity.
Is it a master swimmer?
Some netizens once knew Li Xueqin and knew her family situation, this netizen said that Li Xueqin once participated in the competition as an ordinary player and was not a real swimmer.
But with this incident, netizens are speculating whether Li Xueqin really had a professional level before.
After all, even if you used to be a second-level swimmer, it doesn't mean that you have always been a master swimmer, because after all, people will get old and their skills will regress.
What's more, he participated in the competition as a representative swimmer more than ten years ago, and since then there has been no news, and technically it may no longer be comparable to today's professional athletes.
It turns out that this has to start with the bonus point policy for special athletes in Peking University's independent enrollment.
According to Peking University's independent admissions policy, all special athletes who have won the top eight in national competitions or above can receive extra points, and the requirements are outrageously simple - one swim and two pull-ups.
Obviously, such a simple test cannot assess whether a person still has a true level of professionalism.
However, in the past, Peking University's independent enrollment required the top eight in national competitions or above to obtain extra points, and it is not difficult to find that Peking University's independent enrollment treats ordinary students and special athletes unequally.
Many netizens said that in this information age, under many Internet platforms, a lot of information can be easily found, and only a few people will question and justify.
If it is true that Li Xueqin was not a master swimmer before, then this move undoubtedly infringes on the interests of students who normally apply for Peking University's independent enrollment.
After all, resources are inherently limited, and they should be used to support students who are admitted by strength.
Should it be supported or questioned
And it is precisely because of this incident that Li Xueqin did not make any response to this matter, which also made netizens question her personally.
Li Xueqin, as the target of Peking University's independent enrollment, did not make any response after the incident was exposed, but the people around her personally attacked the whistleblower.
Even when the exposer also proposed to delete the post, Li Xueqin's people attacked her and said that they would sue the expositor.
Such an obviously illogical approach undoubtedly made netizens question and be dissatisfied with Li Xueqin.
But some netizens said that it might be a misunderstanding, or someone else took advantage of Li Xueqin's identity.
Because such an identity is not simple to be impersonated, and there has never been a similar incident before.
Misunderstanding or misalignment
This incident can not help but show that public opinion attaches great importance to the issue of academic integrity, and once a similar incident breaks out, it will immediately trigger great repercussions, and in many cases, it will be directly concluded that the exposed person is the wrong party.
After all, academic integrity is the foundation of the academic system of the whole society, and it is directly related to the future development of the country and even the whole society, so it is particularly important.
But it is precisely because of this that the exposed person should be given a chance to defend and prove himself before public opinion is completely decided, and he should not directly scold and question and doubt himself as soon as he comes up.
Because after all, public opinion is composed of people, and people will always be swayed by emotions in some situations and have one-sided and wrong judgments.
Learn from your mistakes
作为田径运动员我国男子田径队成绩不错近期国际乒联发布最新一期男子乒乓球世界排名 中国队占据榜首位置乒联同时也公布了最新一期女子世界排名 我国选手孙颖莎、陈幸同、王曼昱分列前三甲乒联女子排名中也占据前五名。
The men's basketball team recently announced the list of 12 players who participated in the Asian Cup basketball tournament and World Cup qualifiers, including local players such as Liu Zhixuan and Zhao Jiwei in the Jilin Northeast Tigers.
不仅如此 在刚刚结束不久的世界女排联赛中 东方大国女排也表现抢眼 夺得亚军 并且多位我国队队员入选本次赛事最佳阵容 金软景更是获得MVP称号。
At present, the men's basketball team is expected to play well in the upcoming Asian Cup basketball tournament and the World Preliminary Tournament, and add more opportunities for the World Cup qualifiers to be held in the future.
除了篮球赛场 田径赛场大陆男子田径队伍受关注 近期世界田径锦标赛大陆男子田径队伍表现抢眼 赵子强在铅球比赛中力压群雄 夺冠 再创佳绩。
In the track and field events, the men's track and field team of the Eastern countries also performed eye-catchingly, and many players, including Gong Lijiao and Huang Ling, achieved excellent results and won gold medals in this competition.
看似不相干项目 但其实从中可以看出我国体育整体实力 无论是羽毛球、乒乓球 还是篮球、田径等 都展现出了我国体育强大实力 为体育事业发展增添新鲜血液。
相信随着全民健身意识日益增强 我国体育实力也会越来越强 夺得更多荣誉 拿出更亮眼成绩。
epilogue
Academic integrity is the foundation of social development, but before public opinion is decided, we should also give the exposed a chance to defend and prove themselves. Let us learn a lesson from this incident, remain rational, and do not blindly question or believe one-sided words, only in this way can we better safeguard academic justice and fairness. What do you think?