Before reading this article, please click "Follow" to facilitate discussion and sharing. Don will live up to expectations and bring you high-quality and in-depth articles on a regular basis, thank you for your support!
【Introduction】
In this era of information explosion, the rise of genius is often accompanied by a storm of controversy.
At the age of 16, "Katekate Zhu Zhu", formerly known as Zhu Wenqi, who stepped into the Oxford Mathematics Palace, once became a good story in people's mouths with his extraordinary achievements and appreciation for the rising star Jiang Ping.
When the wind suddenly changed and praise turned to doubt, Zhu Zhu's attitude towards Jiang Ping also underwent a dramatic reversal, and this series of twists and turns not only reflects the complex attitude of the academic community towards genius, but also makes people think deeply: in the absence of solid evidence, how should we deal with those seemingly unreasonable outstanding performances?
[Text]
The focus of the story, Jiang Ping, a secondary school student's name is suddenly linked to "mathematical genius", her competition results amazed everyone, and even academic stars like Zhu Zhu were moved, and even offered to match her and introduce her to a professor in Oxford.
As various math bloggers on the Internet dig deeper, the voices of skepticism begin to clamor in the dust.
Zhu Zhu also had to re-examine, she published a long article on Zhihu, listing a series of doubts, similar handwriting, secondary school transcripts, and the rapid mastery of LaTeX skills, each of which makes people think about it.
During this period, heavyweights in the mathematics community spoke out one after another, such as the "99.99%" guess of Zhao Bin, a master of Peking University, the astonishing oath of the world memory champion David, the resolute maintenance of the purity of the field of mathematics in the mathematics competition Feige, and even the assertion of Dr. Beihang University.
[Heated discussion among netizens]
Netizen A (rational): "Before there is conclusive evidence, everyone should be calmer." Genius may not follow the usual path, and we cannot deny all possibilities based on experience alone. ”
Netizen B (skeptic): "Indeed, those so-called genius deeds, if there is a team operation behind them, are too unfair to those who really work hard." ”
Netizen C (education concerner): "This incident also reflects the issue of educational fairness, and we should pay more attention to how to let every student have a fair chance to compete." ”
Ding netizen (optimist): "In any case, I hope Jiang Ping is a real genius, and society needs such a surprise." However, if it is proved to be false, it should also be dealt with seriously to maintain academic integrity. ”
[Ending]
Jiang Ping's story, like an unsolved detective novel, has whetted the public's appetite. But in this debate between true and false geniuses, perhaps we should reflect on why society defines "genius" so harshly and the desire for success is so urgent that it rushes to label it before the truth is known.
A true academic spirit should encourage the exploration of the unknown, while adhering to objectivity and impartiality, and not judging others based on preconceived notions. In this era of diversity, we need to learn to listen to different voices and wait for the facts to come out.
So, what do you think we should do in the face of similar controversies? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment section and let's discuss together and work together to promote a more open, inclusive and rational social environment.
[Disclaimer]
The time, process, and pictures of the article are all from the Internet, and the article aims to spread positive energy, and there is no vulgarity and other bad guidance.
The audience should look at this incident rationally, and do not leave malicious comments with subjective assumptions, the Internet is not a place outside the law.
If there is a dispute about the authenticity of this article, copyright or picture infringement issues, please contact the author in time, and I will delete the relevant content as soon as possible, thank you.