laitimes

Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

author:Small new highlights
Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

Dear melon eaters, it's time for our weekly "Social Hot Spot Revealed" again! What we are going to talk about today is a topic that makes people have a lot of appetite and no appetite - Fat Donglai's "Rolling Dough Door" incident!

Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

Remember that video you swiped the screen a few days ago? The dough rolling processing place in the catering department of Fat Donglai Supermarket is simply a "horror hut": raw materials and garbage are mixed, and the seasoning barrel is greasy, which makes people feel disgusting. Where is this food processing room, it is clearly a bacterial petri dish!

However, what people didn't expect was that Fat Donglai's reaction speed was amazingly fast, and the processing was even more terrifying! Not only was 100,000 yuan rewarded to the whistleblower, but nearly 9,000 consumers were refunded and compensated with 1,000 yuan, with a total expenditure of more than 8.8 million yuan! This wave of operations can be said to interpret the words "integrity management" to the extreme.

Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

But do you think this is really just a simple "conscientious company" story? Let's take a look at the "gossip" behind this incident.

First of all, Fat Donglai's wave of operations can be said to be a lesson for his peers. If there is a similar incident in the future, consumers will definitely use Fat Donglai's standards to demand other companies. Isn't this equivalent to Fat Donglai invisibly raising the standard for the entire industry? Friends from other supermarkets and catering companies, are you okay?

Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

Secondly, the 100,000 yuan reward for reporting is really a double-edged sword! As the saying goes, there must be brave men under heavy rewards. With such a high reward, it is difficult to guarantee that no one will deliberately pick on the thorns for the sake of money. You must know that there are now many "professional anti-counterfeiters" who make money by reporting corporate problems. Doesn't Fat Dong's coming out open the door to a new world for these people?

Imagine, if every supermarket and restaurant in the future has a group of people holding a magnifying glass to "patrol" around, the picture is too beautiful to see, right? The restaurant is trembling, the customers are suspicious, and such a dining environment is afraid that even eating has become a kind of torment.

Of course, having said that, if every company can pay as much attention to food safety as Fat Donglai and implement the hygiene standards without leakage, then what are you afraid of reporting? Real gold is not afraid of fire, and only companies that can stand the test can win the long-term trust of consumers.

Fat Donglai's "rolling door" detonated public opinion: 100,000 yuan reward for whistleblowers, is it a pattern or a hidden danger?

However, we must also see that the way Fat Donglai handled the incident does reflect the responsibility and courage that an enterprise should have. In today's era of information explosion, every move of companies is under the eyes of the public. In the face of a crisis, a company that can respond quickly, apologize sincerely, and actively compensate can be invincible in the sea of public opinion.

However, dear consumer friends, we must also look at such events rationally. It is not advisable to blindly pursue or beat to death with a stick. We must not only praise the conscience of the enterprise, but also remain vigilant and monitor their continuous improvement. After all, food safety is not temporary, but needs to be adhered to for a long time.

In closing, I would like to say that both businesses and consumers should all contribute to creating a safer and healthier food environment. Enterprises should strictly control, consumers should supervise rationally, and the government should strengthen supervision. Only through the joint efforts of the three parties can our "security on the tip of the tongue" be truly guaranteed.