Please use your golden finger to make a fortune, like and take a walk, get rich forever, pay attention to the like, it is difficult to get rich if you don't want to
In an ordinary community in Zhejiang Province, an unbelievable takeaway dispute is being staged. 22-year-old Zhou, a college graduate who has just entered the workplace, in order to punish the "uninvited guests" who repeatedly stole his takeaways, carefully designed a trap - ordered an egg tart that is as hot as hell.
However, the situation took a turn for the worse when the truth was revealed.
When Zhou learned that the stealer was actually a 5-year-old boy from the neighbor's family, and this innocent "thief" was sent to the hospital for eating this perverted spicy egg tart, his heart suddenly had mixed feelings.
thought that the matter would end here, but the little boy's father was furious, not only refused to admit his son's mistake, but instead sued Zhou in court.
This seemingly absurd case quickly caused an uproar on the Internet, and netizens stood in line and discussed fiercely: Who is the real victim of this farce? How should the law decide this controversial case? A heated debate on ethics, law and education began.
Zhou's heart is restless, and he desperately wants to unravel the mystery of the frequent theft of takeaways. As he waited for the surveillance to be repaired, he began to pay attention to his surroundings, hoping to find clues.
One day, as he was about to throw out the garbage, a detail caught his attention. Takeaway bags appeared in the garbage of neighbors – a young couple and their 5-year-old son.
This discovery made Zhou's heart tighten, because as far as he knew, the family's financial situation was not well-off, and they rarely bought takeout on weekdays. What is even more suspicious is that the bags are very similar to the takeaway packaging he lost.
Finally, the monitoring device was repaired. Zhou looked at the video with apprehension, and the scene in the picture made him dumbfounded: a little boy in a red shirt and black trousers, skillfully rummaging through the takeaway pile, quickly locked Zhou's order.
After confirming that there was no one around, the little boy quickly picked up the takeaway and disappeared into the picture in a blink of an eye.
Seeing this scene, Zhou had mixed feelings in his heart. Anger, helplessness, and confusion are intertwined. He didn't expect that the "habitual offender" who stole his takeaway turned out to be an innocent child.
Directly looking for the child's parent theory? I'm afraid it will only attract disgust, and even be accused of making a big fuss. After thinking about it again and again, Zhou decided to teach this naughty child an unforgettable lesson.
On a weekend afternoon, the sun was just right, and Zhou began to implement his elaborate "revenge" plan. He opened a takeaway platform and chose an egg tart shop with an excellent reputation.
The picture of the egg tart in the store looks extremely tempting, and Zhou knows that this is undoubtedly a huge temptation for a greedy child.
He did not hesitate to place an order, and specifically noted in the remarks column: "Please double the chili, the spicier the better." In order to ensure the effect, he also communicated with merchants through the platform, and repeatedly emphasized that it should be made into a "perverted spicy" taste.
Despite the confusion of the merchants, this special egg tart was made as requested.
When the takeaway was delivered to the door of the community, Zhou's heart beat faster. He hid behind the curtains and stared intently downstairs. Sure enough, it didn't take long for that familiar little figure to appear.
As usual, the little boy found Zhou's takeaway and happily took it.
The next scene made Zhou feel both a little happy and a little guilty. Heart-rending cries came from the neighbors' homes, followed by panicked footsteps and anxious shouts of adults.
Zhou knew that his "revenge" plan was successful, but he didn't expect the effect to be so strong.
Standing in front of the window, Zhou fell into deep thought. He hopes that this lesson will make the child understand the mistake of stealing, but at the same time he is worried about whether he is going too far.
He secretly prayed in his heart that the child would not be hurt too much. However, what he didn't know was that this seemingly simple lesson was about to cause an unexpected storm.
When night fell, Zhou was about to wash up and fall asleep, when his mobile phone suddenly vibrate. An unfamiliar friend application popped up on the screen, and he thought it was work-related, so he passed it casually.
However, he was greeted by a barrage of angry questioning and swearing.
It turned out that this was the father of the little boy. He accused Zhou with a fierce voice: "Those egg tarts you ordered are simply murder!" Are you trying to kill my son? "Reading between the lines is full of anger and threat.
Faced with such an accusation, Zhou was stunned at first, and then couldn't help but smile bitterly.
These words seemed to leave the other party speechless, and the conversation fell into a brief silence. However, early the next morning, the boy's father contacted Zhou again. This time, he changed his strategy, claiming that the child had to be hospitalized because his lips were severely swollen after eating the tart, and that he had already spent nearly 2,000 yuan.
He forcefully demanded that Zhou compensate for the medical expenses and bear all the hospitalization expenses that may be incurred in the future.
Zhou was angry and helpless at this vexatious request. He categorically rejected the other party's claim and pulled it into the blacklist. However, it didn't end there.
In order to avoid possible trouble, Zhou decided to temporarily move to a friend's house for a while.
Sure enough, the little boy's father began to come to his door frequently, knocking and shouting loudly, which seriously affected the normal life of the neighbors. Faced with this situation, Zhou felt that he could no longer be silent.
He decided to make the whole incident public and seek public judgment.
Zhou carefully put together a detailed description, including a record of his order for takeout, a surveillance video of the little boy stealing, and a record of all the conversations with the other party.
He posted the information on his social media accounts and @ several well-known legal bloggers.
This move is like a bombshell and has caused huge attention on the Internet. Posts were quickly retweeted, commented on, and read exponentially. The vast majority of netizens are on Zhou's side, believing that he is the real victim of this incident.
Some netizens commented: "I can't even afford takeout and still have to steal? It's not a question of poverty, it's a question of morality! Someone else pointed out: "Five-year-old children can already distinguish right from wrong, which is obviously a failure of family education."
However, there are also a few voices who question Zhou's approach, believing that his "punishment" is too extreme and may cause psychological shadows to children.
Just when public opinion was intensifying, an unexpected news came: the little boy's father actually decided to sue Zhou! This decision once again ignited the anger of netizens, who condemned this behavior of "thieves shouting to catch thieves".
A heated debate about ethics, law, and education is in full swing in cyberspace.
In the courtroom, the atmosphere was tense and solemn. Zhou stood in the defendant's dock, his face calm but his eyes firm. On the other side, the little boy's father glared angrily, as if he wanted to pierce Zhou with his eyes.
The auditorium was crowded with netizens and media reporters who were concerned about the case, and everyone waited with bated breath for the unveiling of this high-profile lawsuit.
Zhou first stated his experience. He detailed the experience of multiple consecutive takeaway thefts and how he found out the truth through surveillance. He stressed that ordering spicy egg tarts was only to protect his own property rights and interests, and there was no intention to harm others.
"If it weren't for the children taking my takeaways without permission, there would be no follow-up incident," Zhou said calmly, "I think this is a reasonable act of self-preservation."
When it was the little boy's father's turn to speak, he was emotional and his voice trembled. He accused Zhou's actions of seriously hurting his child, which resulted in the child having to be hospitalized.
However, when the judge asked him why he did not stop the child's theft in time, the boy's father was hesitant and could not give a reasonable explanation. This detail was keenly captured by netizens who were observing, sparking a new round of discussion on social media.
The trial lasted a full day. Lawyers on both sides argued fiercely on the application of the law in the case. Eventually, after all the evidence and arguments had been presented, the court adjourned for a collegiate discussion.
In the days of awaiting the verdict, the discussion on the Internet has not diminished in the slightest. Legal experts and education scholars have expressed their views, adding more dimensions to this case.
Finally, in the midst of all the attention, the court made a judgment: rejecting the plaintiff's claim and determining that Zhou's behavior was justified defense and did not constitute illegality.
In the verdict, the judge wrote: "In the face of multiple thefts, the defendant Zhou took a relatively gentle approach to protect his property and did not exceed the necessary limits.
On the contrary, the plaintiff, as the guardian, failed to fulfill his due responsibilities and allowed the child to commit theft many times, which was the root cause of this incident.
As soon as the verdict came out, it immediately caused a huge repercussion on the Internet. The vast majority of netizens expressed their support for this, believing that this judgment reflects the fairness of the law.
Someone commented: "This verdict is a lesson for parents who think 'their children are not wrong'!" Another person said: "I hope this case can remind more people how important it is to cultivate children's sense of integrity from an early age."
When Zhou walked out of the courthouse, he breathed a long sigh of relief. This lawsuit not only cleared him of the false accusation of "murder for money", but also made him feel the power of the law.
And for the little boy's family, this is undoubtedly a heavy blow and a profound lesson.
This seemingly ordinary takeaway dispute actually reflects many problems in contemporary society. It reminds us that even seemingly trivial actions in our daily lives can violate the bottom line of the law.
At the same time, this case also highlights the importance of family education. Parents should cultivate moral values in their children from an early age, rather than condoning wrong behavior.
In addition, this incident also shows the importance of how to properly use legal weapons to protect one's rights and interests in the face of injustice. It tells us that when encountering disputes, retaining evidence, treating them rationally, and seeking legal solutions can often lead to a fair outcome.
Finally, this case has also triggered people's in-depth thinking about social integrity and public morality. In a highly interconnected society, everyone's actions may affect others, and maintaining public order and social morality requires the joint efforts of every citizen.
The outcome of this incident is not only a warning to the parties concerned, but also a collective education for the whole society.
The purpose of this article is to advocate positive social energy, without vulgarity and other bad guidance. If you are involved in copyright or character infringement, please contact us in time