Ooh! Here's another social novelty, this time it won't fix me. There is a Dink man who even confidently claims that his wife's property will go to his niece in the future. What's going on? Is this man's brain caught in the door? Let's take a look at what this is all about.
Brothers and sisters, have you heard? Recently, the Internet can fry! There is a man in the Dink family who takes it for granted that his wife's property should belong to his niece. As soon as this incident came out, netizens were dumbfounded, and they all said that this guy was thinking too much.
Let's first take a look at the ins and outs of this matter. This benevolent brother posted on the Internet and said unashamedly: "You are an only child, and you don't have children, in the future, your parents' real estate and your deposit gold will be my niece's." "Hey, I almost didn't throw my phone away! Does this man think he is married to a cash cow?
To be honest, this kind of thought is really speechless. First of all, it is the freedom of the Dink family to choose not to have children, so why do you think that their property is cheaper for your family? Besides, why does your parents' real estate belong to your niece? Do you think that the marriage certificate is the ATM password?
In fact, this incident reflects a very serious social problem: some people have reached the point of madness in coveting other people's property. Do you think, why should the hard-earned money of the couple be given to your family? Isn't this a desperate household? Moreover, this kind of thinking completely disrespects the fruits of the woman's labor and personal rights, and simply treats people as a tool for making money.
What's even more terrifying is that there is a deep-seated sexism behind this thinking. In the eyes of some, it seems that women should sacrifice everything for their families, not even their own property. This notion should have been thrown into the dustbin of history a long time ago, right? What age is it now, and men are still inferior here?
In the end, it is the selfish and greedy nature of some people that is exposed. Think about it, if the roles are reversed, is this benevolent brother willing to give all his property to his wife and family? I guess he didn't even dare to think about it. This kind of double standard is really disgusting.
In fact, marriage was supposed to be a relationship between two people supporting each other and growing together, but in the eyes of some people, it has become an exchange of interests. This utilitarian view of marriage not only hurts the feelings of husband and wife, but also has a negative impact on the whole society.
So the question is, what should we do in the face of this situation? First of all, both husband and wife should make the property issue clear and clear before marriage. If the concept really doesn't match, it's better to part ways as soon as possible to save trouble in the future.
Secondly, our society also needs to further improve relevant laws and regulations to protect everyone's legitimate rights and interests. Both the Dink family and the ordinary family should have the right to decide the ownership of their own property, rather than being coveted or forcibly distributed by others.
Finally, each of us should establish a correct view and values of marriage. Marriage is not a business, let alone an exchange of interests. Mutual respect and equal treatment are the foundation of maintaining a relationship. If you can't even do that, then what's the point of happiness?
So in the end, I want to ask: If you were that Dink woman, what would you do in the face of such a husband who is worried about your property? Do you choose to swallow your anger or divorce decisively? What do you think about this?