laitimes

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

An ordinary all-night party turned out to be a heinous drug case. The impulsiveness of the three young people not only endangered the health and safety of others, but also dragged themselves into the punishment of the criminal law.

Loading...

What kind of case is this? What is the motivation and process of the parties' actions? Is the court's sentencing appropriate? These issues have sparked heated discussions in all walks of life. Let's take a closer look at the truth of this case and explore the legal, moral, and social issues involved.

On June 15, 2023, the Shenzhen Municipal People's Procuratorate disclosed a heinous drug case: Yang, Lin, and Xiaoqian were prosecuted by the procuratorate on suspicion of inducing others to take drugs.

It is reported that the matter started a few months ago. At that time, Yang observed that his colleague was not in a good state, so he proposed that everyone go to the B&B to hold an all-night party together to boost morale. Yang's friend Lin quickly helped book a homestay.

On the evening of June 13, a total of 8 people attended the party, including Yang, Xiaoqian and his wife, as well as their colleague Ah Qiang and others.

During the party, Yang and Xiaoqian made drinks for everyone in the pantry. Soon, Cuong felt dizzy and uncomfortable. At this moment, he found that Yang was pouring an unidentified powder into a glass of beer. Realizing that something was wrong, Cuong immediately called the police for help.

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

Police quickly arrived at the scene and tested drinks and other items at the scene. The results showed that the drinks contained common drug ingredients such as 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and ketamine.

Subsequently, the police also searched Yang's residence and found four bottles of capsules containing suspected drugs, with a total weight of more than 200 grams, which were indeed identified as containing drugs.

In view of this, Yang, Xiaoqian and Lin were prosecuted by the procuratorate on suspicion of deceiving others to take drugs.

What is puzzling is why these three young people would behave in such a heinous way? It is understood that Yang is a fresh graduate who has just graduated, and Xiaoqian is a woman who is preparing to get married. And Lin is Yang's friend. Why did they embark on this path of no return?

Lin claimed that he only assisted in booking a homestay, and did not know that Yang and others would do such a thing.

In this way, it seems that the motive of the trio is to "boost morale" through this party, but they choose extremely dangerous and illegal methods. Not only do they disregard the health and safety of others, but they also try to use drugs for "entertainment", completely ignoring laws and regulations.

In response, Cuong, who participated in the party, said angrily: "They are simply crazy! On his own impulse, he even tried to make us take drugs without regard for the safety of our lives. This kind of behavior is despicable and should be punished severely!"

It is not difficult to see that the behavior of Yang and others has violated the bottom line of the law and seriously harmed the rights and interests of others. So, how does the court ultimately decide?

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

According to public information, at the beginning of July 2023, the case officially entered the trial stage. After the trial, the court made a first-instance judgment: Yang was sentenced to 7 months in prison, Xiaoqian was sentenced to 6 months in prison, Lin was detained for 4.5 months, and the three were each fined 3,000 yuan.

Such a sentencing result has sparked heated discussions from all walks of life, and many netizens have said that such a sentence seems too lenient.

Some people pointed out that the actions of Yang and others have seriously endangered the lives and health of others, and should be punished more severely. After all, not only do they deliberately mix their drinks with drugs in an attempt to trick others into taking drugs, but they also store large amounts of drugs in their homes. Such behavior not only violates the law, but also completely ignores the bottom line of morality.

"These three people are simply a bunch of psychopaths! It's ridiculous that they treat their colleagues like white rats and try to get people to take drugs to get them to get their spirits up. Even if there are no serious consequences, their actions have seriously damaged the physical and mental health of others. The court's punishment is too light to reflect the deterrent effect of the law. A netizen said angrily.

Other netizens believe that the court's sentencing result is already harsh. They pointed out that although the conduct of Yang and others was indeed despicable, since it did not cause serious consequences, it should be reasonable to sentence only a fixed-term imprisonment and a fine. After all, the purpose of the law is not only to punish, but also to guide and educate criminals so that they can recognize their mistakes and reintegrate into society.

"The behavior of these three people is indeed very bad, but I think the punishment of the court is already relatively heavy. Although their actions were outrageous, they did not cause casualties or cause large-scale social harm. The imprisonment and fine should be a warning and a lesson for them. Hopefully, they will be able to truly recognize their mistakes and not make the same mistakes again in the future. A netizen said.

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

This debate over the appropriateness of sentencing reflects the strong call from all walks of life for cracking down on drug crimes. On the one hand, the public was outraged and indignant at the brutality of the case and believed that heavier punishments should be imposed; On the other hand, some people have also stressed that judicial decisions should not only reflect the seriousness of the law, but also pay attention to the purpose of education and guidance, so that criminals can truly understand their mistakes and get back on the right track.

This contradiction reflects the different demands of the current society on how to deal with the problem of drug crimes.

In fact, this is not an isolated case. In recent years, with the frequent occurrence of drug-related crimes, many people have questioned the intensity of the judicial organs' crackdown. Some people believe that the current criminal punishment is far from satisfying people's yearning for fairness and justice, and that such lawbreakers should be punished more vigorously. Others, on the other hand, believe that in addition to severe punishment, it is more necessary to prevent and curb the occurrence of drug-related crimes at the source, such as intensifying publicity and education and helping drug addicts reintegrate into society.

It can be said that this case not only reflects the judicial organs' severe crackdown on drug cases, but also reflects the diverse demands of all sectors of society for criminal justice.

How should we view the outcome of this case? What kind of social problems does this debate over sentencing reflect?

In order to explore these issues, the author has conducted an in-depth review of relevant laws and the views of experts and scholars.

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

According to the provisions of the Criminal Law of the mainland, the act of "providing drugs to others" is a crime and should be punished in accordance with the law. However, the Criminal Law does not make a clear definition of the specific sentencing standards, but should make a comprehensive assessment based on factors such as the severity of the crime and the harmfulness to society.

A criminal law expert said: "When dealing with drug cases, courts often need to take into account many factors, including the degree of subjective malice of the perpetrator, the actual harmful consequences, and the attitude of admitting guilt. Although the behavior of Yang and others is indeed very despicable, because it has not yet caused serious consequences, the court chose to give a lighter punishment in sentencing, also for the purpose of education and guidance, hoping that they can truly recognize their mistakes and return to society. "

Another judicial scholar said: "Of course, we should severely punish drug crimes, but at the same time, we should also pay attention to the role of guidance and education." It is far from enough to rely solely on severe punishment, but it is all the more necessary to prevent and curb the spread of the drug problem at the source, strengthen the publicity and popularization of relevant laws and regulations, and help drug addicts reintegrate into society. Only in this way can social fairness and justice be truly realized. "

Indeed, how to give full play to the role of legal deterrence and pay attention to the effect of education and guidance is a difficult problem that needs to be balanced. Different voices also reflect the diverse demands of the current society on this issue.

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

Perhaps, although the court's sentencing has caused controversy in this case, it still reflects its prudent attitude in the trial process. At the same time, the heated discussions in all sectors of society also show that everyone is concerned about and calls for intensifying the fight against narcotics, and hopes to jointly curb the spread of drug-related crimes through various means, such as improving the legal system and strengthening publicity and education.

We hope that, with the strict enforcement of the law and the concerted efforts of all sectors of society, such cases will eventually serve as a concrete example to warn and prevent more people from breaking the law. Only in this way can we truly achieve fairness and justice and maintain social security and harmony.

What are your insights on the outcome of this case? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below, and let's discuss how to better protect public safety and build a better society.

The three deceived their colleagues into drinking poison and drinks, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice?

# "Three people tricked their colleagues into drinking poison, and their sentences sparked heated discussions: does the punishment show justice? ”