"Come on, someone's overboard!" There was a hurried shout from the lake, and a man jumped into the water without hesitation. It turned out that a mother and son accidentally fell into the water and were in danger. Thanks to this kind Samaritan who acted bravely, although the mother and son were rescued, the rescuer himself was swept away by the turbulent water, and his life and death are still uncertain. What is even more puzzling is that the rescued family actually "evaporated from the world" and was never heard from. Such a grace will be avenged, which is embarrassing.
This scene vividly interprets the current chilling social phenomenon - "saving people is false". In the face of the life and death of others, should we still lend a hand? This can't help but make people think deeply.
Here's what happened
On the afternoon of July 14, in a reservoir in Wuhan, Hubei, a man found that a mother and son had fallen into the water, and the condition was very critical. In the moment of crisis, the man stepped forward and jumped into the water desperately, pushing the family ashore one after another, but he was swept away by the turbulent current. Fortunately, with the help of other enthusiastic people, the man was eventually rescued ashore, but he fell into a coma. It is understood that the rescuer is currently being rescued in the ICU, and his life and death are uncertain.
What is shocking is that the rescued mother and son not only did not express any gratitude, but also "played missing" and never heard from them. Some witnesses revealed that on the day of the incident, a pair of twins and a woman were seen holding each other away, suspected to be rescued.
What's even more puzzling is that after 43 hours, the family didn't even show their faces, as if they had evaporated from the world.
Could it be that he was worried about taking responsibility, so he chose to "run away"? Are they so indifferent to the misery of their benefactors? This kind of indifferent and selfish face really shocked everyone's jaws.
Putting aside their moral deficiencies, from a legal point of view, the rescued person has a duty of safety to the rescuer.
Article 183 of the Civil Code clearly stipulates that if a rescuer who is not at fault suffers damages, the rescued person shall be liable for compensation. This means that the rescued mother and son will not only have to bear the medical expenses of the rescuer, but also bear the corresponding compensation for moral damages. How can someone's life-saving grace be written off with a few cold words of thanks?
In fact, the root cause of being falsely accused of saving people is not only the moral degradation of some rescued people, but also reflects the crisis of trust in the whole society.
People have long developed the habit of hanging high on their own business. Refined egoism is rampant, and selfless acts of kindness have become "alternative". What's more, helping others is regarded as stupid, and selfishness is the standard for "smart people".
As everyone knows, without empathy for the suffering of others, where can there be reverence for life? Without the practice of public order and good customs, how can the moral bottom line of the whole society be maintained?
But it is gratifying that despite such a harsh environment, there are still countless "retrogrades" who have gone forward to practice justice one after another.
Open the newspaper, you can always see all kinds of touching rescue stories; Turn on the network, and you can see volunteers everywhere...... It is they who guard the warmth of the world with practical actions and support the backbone of society with selfless love. These ordinary and great heroes deserve everyone's respect and need the care of the law.
As ordinary people, we should ask ourselves: If we were faced with a similar situation one day, what would we do? Do you learn from others to look on coldly, or take the initiative to lend a hand? Life is priceless, and good deeds have no regrets. The answer is self-explanatory. Although it may be risky to reach out to help, in the face of the lives and safety of others, we cannot tolerate too many selfish distractions. Because the next victim may be ourselves.
So finally, I would like to ask: If one day, we or our relatives around us suddenly encounter an accident, do we still hope to get help from passers-by? Or do you choose to turn a blind eye to the suffering of others and watch from the sidelines? What do you think about this?