The situation has changed! United States is at a dead end!

The current situation is undoubtedly a serious challenge for Ukraine. Vance, Trump's running mate, said directly in an interview: "I really don't care what happens in Ukraine." He also criticized United States' aid to Ukraine as a toss-up, saying that Ukraine has been "functionally destroyed" and that it is "ridiculous" to want to defeat Russia on the battlefield.

He also sharply criticized Zelensky for preaching and asking for money from United States. As the number two person in Trump's camp, his remarks are likely to represent the attitude of the next United States administration on the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war. For Ukraine, this means a bumpier road ahead.

It is important to note that Vance's remarks were not just personal opinions or part of Trump's campaign strategy. At the Aspen Security Forum, Blinken's remarks echoed similar sentiments. He said that if Trump wins the November election, United States may no longer support Ukraine. He also played a tai chi, saying that every United States government has its own small calculations, and no one knows what will happen in the future.

Blinken still continued United States's traditional style of "dead friends do not die poor", but also added that even if the United States is withdrawn, more than 20 countries will pat their chests at the NATO summit and promise to continue to send guns and money to Ukraine. In the past, it was the big brother of United States who led the charge, but now it is withdrawn first, letting the little brothers go up. However, the younger brothers are not fuel-efficient lamps either. While they are taking on more responsibility, they are also re-evaluating their contributions.

Germany, for example, recently adjusted the scale of its military aid to Ukraine, slashing it from the original promised 8 billion euros to 4 billion euros. Other Western countries are also calculating, shouting slogans and paying for it? That's not going to work!

In this case, Zelensky's tone of speech has also changed significantly. According to a report by United States on the 20th, in the face of difficult front-line realities and the prospect that Trump may enter the White House, Zelensky's attitude has changed, hinting that negotiations will be held with Russia.

He also suggested that Moscow send a delegation to the next peace summit in Ukraine in November. You know, Russia was not invited to the first peace summit in Switzerland before. Because Zelensky previously said that any negotiations can only take place after Russia withdraws its troops from Ukraine.

Objectively speaking, judging by the current situation, if Ukraine finally accepts the peace agreement in humiliation, it will only be a temporary ceasefire. First of all, we must be clear that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is not just a contest between United States and Russia, but also a domestic political struggle between the Democratic Party and United States the Republican Party.

After Trump's assassination, United States public opinion began to speculate whether it was Ukraine's hand. If it is really the hand of Ukraine, considering the background of the Biden family in Ukraine, it is difficult to rule out some kind of connection between Ukraine and Biden behind this. And at the time of the election, Trump took this shot, which unexpectedly boosted his approval rating, which put the Democratic Party in a dilemma. While the Democrats moved quickly to adjust their tactics by forcing Biden out of the race to change the unfavorable electoral landscape, such a move was clearly not enough to turn things around.

Some people say that Russia also wants a truce and rest, which is only half true. For Putin, he has been deceived by the West for more than a decade, not just eight. The beam has already been settled, and it can't be settled with a flicker. Therefore, he must not only play the national prestige, but also clear the obstacles for the future. In other words, Russia is ready for a showdown with NATO as a whole at any time.

In this case, if the Democrats fail to win the election, then they are likely to use the Russia-Ukraine conflict as a pawn to create problems for the Trump administration. Even if it may go to the heart of United States's national destiny. But in order to defend their huge interests, the Democratic Party will definitely not let Trump go easily. And as long as Ukraine does not accept defeat, the Democratic party's sponsors can still benefit a lot from the super project of Ukraine.

In other words, even if Trump is re-elected president, he may not be able to get rid of internal political strife in the coming term, and he may be attacked by cold arrows in the political arena at any time. There is no shortage of lessons from history, and Caesar, who thinks of ancient Rome, even if he is eloquent, could not escape the fatal blow caused by touching the bottom line of vested interests, and finally fell under the shadow of conspiracy and betrayal in the gladiatorial arena of power.

Now Trump intends to implement a strategic contraction abroad and plans to obtain resources from allies to subsidize low- and middle-income white families in the United States. Such a move is likely to provoke skepticism and opposition from traditional elites, who are more inclined to maintain the status quo as consumers than to cultivate "producers". Just imagine, these two diametrically opposed ideas collide together, like oil and water, which cannot be fused no matter what. This huge divide is like an insurmountable chasm, and there is no possibility of reconciliation.

More critically, if Trump abandons Ukraine, it will be like toppling the first domino, triggering a chain reaction that will sweep across Europe and cause panic; At the same time, it would deal a major blow to the Democrats' proxy war tactics and could prompt China and Russia to take a more active stance on global strategy. This was followed by a violent upheaval in the global trading system, with countries looking for new backers to protect themselves. Once this happens, we will witness an unprecedented geopolitical wrestling: Eagle Sauce is in hot pursuit with the Rabbit, and the Rabbit is fighting back in a power vacuum around the world. For a long time, the outside world has often criticized the flaws of the rabbit system, but few people have delved into the inherent fragility of the Eagle Sauce model.

Today, Eagle Sauce's weakness is exposed. Eagle Sauce's prosperity depends on a never-ending strategic expansion to absorb new benefits, support its huge institutional operating costs, heavy debt burden, and maintain a high quality of life for its citizens. Once the momentum of expansion is halted, internal crises will follow, and the abyss of debt, inflation, and political strife will storm over and threaten the solid foundations of Eagle Sauce.

From a broader perspective, these political wrangling, fierce undercurrents, and even the Make United States Great Again (MAGA) movement are little more than small ripples in the long river of history. The real challenge is that if Eagle Sauce can't find a way to overcome the contradiction between the need for continuous expansion and internal stability, then what awaits them is likely to be endless hardship and decline.

It is worth noting that the rabbit from the east seems to have already seen the opportunity, and its every strategic deployment is like a carefully woven net, silently restricting the space for Eagle Sauce's movement, making it difficult for it to flap its wings and fly. This makes people wonder whether the game between the rabbits and eagles is quietly approaching a decisive turning point, and a substantial confrontation seems to be looming.

However, it is still too early to draw conclusions about whether the future will be friend or foe, sabre-rattling or handshakes. But what is certain is that if Eagle Sauce accidentally steps in the wrong direction, she may step into a desperate situation with no turning back.