This article is only published in Toutiao, and the articles on other platforms are counterfeit for your better reading experience, click "Follow", and I will update you with entertainment information every day.
Today I want to share with you a piece of news that has recently caused a lot of waves in the cross talk industry. On the 24th, Li Kuan, on behalf of Hou Yaohua, sent a lawyer's letter to Qiu Yingjun, and on the 25th, Qiu Yingjun replied! This series of events must have made everyone full of curiosity.
What are the reasons and stories behind the rights and wrongs of the cross talk world? Is it a clash of ideas? Or is there something else going on? Let's see how these two deal with this turmoil and what impact it will have on the cross talk industry. Next, let's pay attention and discuss together.
Yang Yi, Lao Wang, and Zheng Hao of Deyun Club in the Tianjin cross talk industry also participated in this discussion, which further aggravated the situation. It was originally just an ordinary live broadcast, but because of the intervention of all parties, it has become more complex and thought-provoking.
In this series of discussions, Qiu Yingjun became the first well-known person to express his opinion on the incident. He made a playful suggestion through the video, which undoubtedly added fuel to the fire and made the already hot event even more boiling. On July 24, Hou Yaohua's assistant Li Kuan revealed in the live broadcast that he had sent a lawyer's letter to Qiu Yingjun's unit and the Qu Association, demanding that he apologize and bear the legal consequences. This news instantly exploded on the Internet, and public opinion from all sides was raised.
And on July 25, Qiu Yingjun replied. He did not apologize directly, and his attitude seemed indifferent. This response once again sparked heated discussions among netizens.
Many netizens have different views on this lawyer's letter incident. Some netizens believe that sending a lawyer's letter is a necessary measure. In their opinion, Qiu Yingjun, as a junior, is inappropriate to comment on the behavior of the elders like this. Mr. Hou Yaohua may have something wrong in the live broadcast, but Qiu Yingjun's preconceived point of pointing at others is indeed a bit excessive.
Moreover, they believe that Qiu Yingjun's behavior has affected Hou Yaohua's reputation, so an apology is necessary. If Qiu Yingjun does not apologize, then it is completely reasonable to solve it through legal means, that is, "see you in court", and there is nothing wrong with it.
There is also another group of netizens who hold a different point of view. They believe that in the era of free speech, everyone has the right to express their opinions. Qiu Yingjun just expressed his opinion, perhaps with some fierce words, but he should not be asked to apologize for this. Moreover, Mr. Hou Yaohua's involvement in sensitive topics in the live broadcast should be judged by the public.
How exactly will this event develop? This is the question that is currently haunting the minds of many followers. Will Qiu Yingjun finally apologize? This possibility is still fraught with uncertainty and uncertainty at the moment. How will Hou Yaohua respond? Do you choose to be tough to the end, or do you seek some kind of compromise or reconciliation? All of this is unknown.
Judging from the current situation, the attitude of all parties appears to be relatively resolute. Qiu Yingjun's seemingly indifferent attitude when facing the lawyer's letter sent by Hou Yaohua's assistant makes it difficult to grasp his true thoughts. Does he really think he's not at fault, or is he dealing with outside pressure in a pretended light-hearted manner?
As for Hou Yaohua's side, since they have already taken tougher measures such as sending a lawyer's letter, will they take further tougher measures in the future, such as really going to court to resolve the dispute through legal means? Or they may also choose a relatively relaxed way to deal with the matter under the pressure of public opinion, trying to calm down the turmoil.
Furthermore, we must also take into account the influence of external factors on the development of this event. The public opinion environment in the entertainment industry has always been complex and changeable, and the public's attitude and voice will play a role in the direction of events to a large extent.
If most netizens continue to support Hou Yaohua and demand an apology from Qiu Yingjun, then Qiu Yingjun may feel more pressure to change his position. On the contrary, if the public believes that Qiu Yingjun's remarks are reasonable and questions Hou Yaohua's performance in the live broadcast, then Hou Yaohua's side may also need to re-examine his strategy.
In addition, the reaction within the industry cannot be ignored. The views and attitudes of colleagues in the cross talk industry on this matter may have a certain impact on both parties. Will more of their peers come forward and support one side of the other, or will everyone choose to remain silent and wait and see how things develop? This has the potential to change the pattern of events.
But what is certain is that the controversy caused by the live broadcast has far exceeded the initial imagination. It may have been just an ordinary live broadcast, but because of the sensitive topics involved and the involvement of all parties, it gradually evolved into a hot event that has attracted much attention in the entertainment industry.
The discussion it sparked is no longer limited to the personal conflict between Hou Yaohua and Qiu Yingjun, but involves many aspects of issues, such as the way of communication between juniors and elders, the boundaries of freedom of speech, and the norms of words and deeds of public figures in live broadcasts.
This incident also shows us the rapid dissemination of information and the huge influence in the Internet era. It was unimaginable that a small live stream could spark such a wide range of attention and discussion in an instant. At the same time, it also reminds us that in this era of information explosion, everyone needs to be responsible for their words and actions, especially public figures, whose every move may be magnified and become the object of public attention and judgment.
It is difficult to say exactly where this incident will ultimately go. It will end with Qiu Yingjun's apology, so that the turmoil will gradually subside; It remains to be seen whether it will end in a way that is completely unexpected, such as a sudden rapprochement between the two sides, or the intervention of a new key player that will lead to a major shift in the situation.
In the present, all we can do is continue to wait and watch. However, no matter what the final outcome is, there is no doubt that this incident has brought us many aspects worthy of in-depth consideration and summary, so that we can have a clearer understanding and judgment of similar situations.
And in the midst of this controversy, we can't help but think, in the era of freedom of speech, how to grasp the scale of speech? What principles should be followed in the evaluation of the elders by the younger generations? Is it to respect the dignity and order of tradition, or to insist on the supremacy of truth? There may not be an absolute answer to these questions, but they are worth thinking about in depth for each of us. The development of this event is full of uncertainty and controversy, so let's wait and see how it will end up.