When it comes to processor and graphics card manufacturers, we have to mention AMD, Intel, and Nvidia. At the same time, these companies are also competitors, but the strange thing is that Intel's direct competitor in terms of CPU is Intel, and Nvidia's competitor in GPU is also AMD, which leads to AMD being sandwiched between the two giants in terms of CPU and GPU, so that the final outcome is that AMD has to fight against the two major competitors on its own.
So the question is, in the face of such a front and back attack, is AMD really being comprehensively suppressed by the two giants?
In fact, this depends on when to talk about it, AMD was not originally a GPU, his main business is CPU, but later acquired the old GPU manufacturer ATI and became a manufacturer that owns both CPU and CPU. But at the same time, the problem also comes, because AMD's front is too long, it is not easy to take care of both CPU and GPU at the same time, they have no advantage in comparing Intel that focuses on CPU, and Nvidia that does GPU, and the final outcome is that the early stage was fully suppressed by these two giants, so it is no problem to say that the CPU was fully suppressed by Intel and the GPU was fully suppressed by Nvidia in the early days.
You must know that in the first few years, AMD lagged behind Intel in architecture and process, and when it was at its lowest, the Intel i3 series was able to fully suppress AMD's entire family. AMD also faces the same problem in terms of GPU, and high power consumption and high heat generation have become the biggest weakness of AMD graphics cards. But AMD also has its own killer feature, and he has captured a part of the gamers who pursue cost-effectiveness and like to toss computer loyalists at a polar price. Everyone must understand that under the absolute price gap, in fact, performance can be ignored, plus as long as AMD can play, his performance is not necessarily much worse than Intel, so AMD has been insisting on cost performance.
There may be many friends who don't know that at the beginning, Intel received a large order from IBM, and then provided technology and X86 permanent authorization, and pulled the little brother AMD to OEM for it, and in the end, the two brothers made a lot of money. However, in the face of absolute interests, the back is not settled, AMD began to take orders on its own, which made Intel dissatisfied, thinking of a way to target AMD, first the technology was terminated and then ready to terminate X86, which eventually led to a lawsuit between AMD and Intel for several years, but fortunately, Intel finally stopped, on the one hand, Intel and AMD and other parties cooperated, on the other hand, there was an anti-monopoly law in the United States, so in the end AMD still won the lawsuit, but even so, AMD's share is very small.
However, AMD did not give up because of this, and finally achieved a reverse chase in the launch of the Ryzen series, and now in the Ryzen 7000 series, both in terms of performance and process have surpassed Intel. You must know that Intel is still hovering around 10nm, while AMD, on the other hand, has entered the 5nm era, and it is possible that the Ryzen 9000 series will use TSMC's 4nm process. Therefore, the sales volume of Intel's toothpaste factory has been declining for several years, on the contrary, AMD's has indeed continued to rise, so it seems inaccurate to say that AMD processors cannot be sold by Intel at this stage.
As for graphics cards, AMD can't sell Nvidia, Nvidia almost occupies more than 80% of the graphics card market, while AMD has less than 20% of the share, maybe someone here will say that Intel didn't also launch a graphics card business? Judging from the current feedback in the market, Intel's graphics card market accounts for less than 1%, which has no impact on AMD and Nvidia at all. So for now, Nvidia is indeed surpassing AMD and Intel in an all-round way, especially with the advent of the Ai era, Nvidia has seized the opportunity again, and it is almost impossible for AMD and Intel to surpass Nvidia in GPU.
So the statement that AMD CPUs can't sell Intel can be changed, as for graphics cards, AMD does not sell Nvidia, but one thing you must understand is that AMD's cost performance is definitely higher than Intel and NVIDIA, I don't know what friends think about this?