For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!
Editor: Xiangxiang Kanyu
An explosive news about the secretary of the Wannian County Party Committee in Jiangxi Province suspected of sexually assaulting a female subordinate has appeared on the hot search.
The central figure of the incident is a female township cadre named Li Peixia. Her father, Li Changliu, a retired teacher, exposed it through the Internet, accusing Mao Qi, secretary of the Wannian County Party Committee, of sexually assaulting Li Peixia many times, and hinting that his daughter was retaliated against and placed in custody for investigation.
After the official preliminary investigation, it was announced that Mao Qi was suspected of serious violations of discipline and law and was subject to review and investigation by the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, and the circumstances were indeed shocking.
The official response was unexpectedly swift. Just a few days later, Wannian County announced that Li Peixia herself was investigated for serious violations of discipline and law.
This series of sudden changes has made many netizens question whether the official is covering up the truth. In this regard, Li Changliu's response added to the mystery and mystery.
He seemed to understand whether his daughter was investigated, not only saying that his daughter might be "no big problem", but also implying that her detention was related to the previous conflict with Moltke, and there was a possibility of Moltke's retaliation.
Although the outside world lacks more details about this incident, the government and the people have formed a certain degree of confrontation and stalemate in the expression. On the one hand, the official characterization of Li Peixia's behavior as "serious violation of discipline and law" implies that she has committed serious crimes abusing public office, rather than being a victim, and has taken corresponding disciplinary sanctions. On the other hand, there is still Li Changliu, a firm "insider", who defends the voice of his daughter. The two theories could not thoroughly judge what was right and which was wrong, and the whole incident was shrouded in a veil of confusion and suspicion.
This impasse between the government and the people actually reflects the limitations of the investigation mechanism for job-related crimes in the mainland's current discipline supervision system. As a high-stakes sexual assault allegation, it is easy to fall into the misunderstanding of opportunism, presumption of guilt, and black-box operation. Perhaps as a grassroots cadre, Li Peixia did violate the red line of discipline, but the outside world undoubtedly pays more attention to the fairness and justice of the major crime charge of sexual assault.
The Li Peixia incident has aroused widespread doubts and concerns in the whole society about the mechanism for investigating and dealing with job-related crimes. As both the watchdog and the supervised, there is a lack of sufficient mutual trust between the official and the public. This not only reflects the many shortcomings of the existing system, but also reflects the public's desire and voice for credibility. To completely reverse this dilemma, more open, transparent and inclusive measures are needed.
In a society governed by the rule of law, the pursuit of fairness and justice is the most basic aspiration of the people. Until the core issue of the Li Peixia incident is satisfactorily resolved, it may be difficult to stop this call. Should we reflect on what is missing from the people's restraint and supervision mechanism for power in a democratic country governed by the rule of law?
This not only reflects the institutional defects, but also the true portrayal of the social development of our time. Tracing back to the source, this is not only a question of power supervision mechanism, but also a problem of social value construction. On the one hand, we need to improve and optimize the existing discipline inspection and supervision system, give it higher credibility, and establish a democratic, fair and transparent power operation mechanism. But on the other hand, it is more important to reshape people's basic cognition and attitude towards power, truly establish the spirit of the rule of law, and establish the mainstream value orientation of equality, justice and democracy.
There has always been a stubborn disease of mystification, hierarchy, and privilege of power on the mainland. Both the rulers and the ruled have an excessive fear of power, and at the same time they are lucky, covetous, and dependent on power. Power is over-deified and seen as a symbol of inviolability and supremacy, becoming the ultimate goal pursued by some. The grassroots people, on the other hand, generally have a kowtow mentality towards power, and involuntarily equate it with vested interests. When authority is challenged, fear and suspicion arise and become uncontrollable. This not only promotes the absolutization and decay of power, but also restricts the benign development of civil society.
The Li Peixia incident has opened up a corner of this ugly reality for us. In this case, Moltke symbolizes a corrupt form of power. With the help of the power and status in his hands, he did whatever he wanted, fully demonstrating the luck psychology that power brings to people. As a party, Li Peixia had to succumb to the authoritative pressure of her superiors and passively bear all this. Even after the incident, the public's questioning of the matter did not receive an adequate response. This not only exposes our lack of a basic democratic sense of power, but also highlights our lack of values.
The Li Peixia incident has aroused widespread concern in the whole society, reflecting our many deficiencies in power supervision and rights protection. But more importantly, it is another wake-up call for value building. We not only need institutional innovation, but also conceptual sublimation. Only when fairness, justice, democracy and the rule of law are truly rooted in the minds of all citizens can a just, civilized and orderly society continue to move forward. In this process, every citizen has an unshirkable responsibility. Regarding the Li Peixia incident, should we reflect on what our reflection and value orientation are on this matter as a qualified modern citizen?
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.