For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to be able to see more content in time, click "Follow" and I will update more wonderful stories and share different wonderful moments for you every day
Dong Yuhui's farewell letter is such an event that has aroused a lot of attention and different voices. Yan Feng, a professor at Fudan University, criticized the letter, arguing that it was flashy and might have obscured its true intentions.
The majority of netizens have different opinions, and a discussion on literary expression and emotional transmission has begun. Let's take a closer look at the differences in how individuals express themselves. Everyone is a unique individual, with their own unique personality, experiences, and ways of thinking, which shape their very different ways of expression.
Some people are born with rich emotions and colorful inner worlds, and they tend to use flowery rhetoric to paint the scenes in their hearts, trying to present those complex and delicate emotions to the world in a colorful way. For them, every word is a splash of color on a palette, and every rhetoric is a cornerstone of the inner castle.
They believe that through carefully crafted language, those hidden depths can be conveyed more precisely and vividly
Emotions and thoughts in the bottom of my heart. Taking Dong Yuhui's farewell letter as an example, perhaps he is such a person with delicate emotions and good at using rich words to express his heart. Under his pen, every sentence is like a carefully drawn picture, full of color and detail. In this way, he may hope that the reader will be able to feel more deeply the complex feelings of his farewell moment, the intertwined emotions that are both reluctant and hopeful, both memories of the past and longing for the future.
Others prefer unpretentious language. They believe that simple and direct expression can better touch the essence of things and more truly reflect the inner voice. They believe that truly deep emotions don't need flowery packaging, and that plain language has great power in itself. A simple "goodbye", in their eyes, may contain a heavier emotion than a thousand words; A "thank you" may be more touching than any flowery words of thanksgiving.
This difference is not a distinction between superior and inferior, but a reflection of human diversity. Just as there are stirring symphonies and simple ballads in music, and oil paintings and fresh and elegant ink paintings in paintings, literary expression should also be inclusive and respectful of different styles. The key is whether it can truly touch the reader's heart and accurately convey the core emotion that the author wants to express, no matter what method you choose.
Next, let's consider the influence of cultural context on expression. Human society is a diverse and rich family, and different regions, nationalities and histories have given birth to a variety of cultures. In these cultures, each has its own unique ideas and traditions regarding the use of words and language.
In some cultures, ornate rhetoric is seen as a form of masterful artistic expression, a symbol of cultural accomplishment and wisdom. For example, in the ancient Chinese literary tradition, poetry and poetry often used rich imagery, subtle confrontations, and ornate rhetoric to show the author's talent and depth of emotion.
In Japan's waka culture, there is also a pursuit of beautiful language and neat form. These cultures believe that through the careful selection and arrangement of words, a state of beauty can be achieved, so that the work not only has the function of conveying information, but also has the value of artistic appreciation. In some other cultures, plain language is seen as a sign of sincerity and reliability. For example, in some Nordic cultures, people pay more attention to direct, concise and practical expression, believing that too much embellishment may obscure the essence of things.
In some tribal cultures in Africa, oral stories and proverbs often convey the wisdom and values of life in a simple and easy-to-understand way. When we evaluate a person's expression, we can't isolate it from the cultural context in which they live. Dong's farewell letter may be seen as poetic and emotionally charged in some cultural contexts, while in others it may be considered too complex. However, this does not mean that we can simply measure all expressions by one standard, but rather try to understand and respect the unique perspectives of different cultures on the use of language.
Let's focus on the quality of the work itself. Whether it is ornate or simple language, it is only the external form of the work, and what really determines its value is the connotation and emotion carried by the work. An excellent work should be able to resonate with readers, so that they can think, feel and be touched in the process of reading.
Dong Yuhui's farewell letter, if it can make readers feel his sincerity and reluctance in that complicated rhetoric, and can make people think deeply about the theme of parting, then it has a certain value. Even if some people think that the language is too ornate, if behind the ornateness is a sincere heart, an affectionate reminiscence of the past and a firm belief in the way forward, then the letter should not be dismissed simply because of the way it is expressed.
On the other hand, if a letter is just a pile of flowery words, but lacks real emotional and ideological connotation, then no matter how brilliant its appearance, it can hardly be called an excellent work. If a simple letter can convey a profound philosophy of life and warm emotions in concise and clear language, then it is equally worthy of our praise and cherishment.
Returning to the controversy over Dong Yuhui's farewell letter, we can see that this is not just a discussion about an article, but also a reflection on how we view literary expression, how to respect individual differences, and how to understand different cultures.
In this pluralistic society, we should learn to appreciate different voices and expressions, and not easily make one-sided evaluations of other people's works. We should respect Dong Yuhui and those who, like him, choose to express their emotions with flowery rhetoric, because it is a true reflection of their inner world.
We should also understand those who prefer plain language, because simplicity and directness have irreplaceable charm. More importantly, when we evaluate any work, we should delve into its intrinsic value and focus on the core message and emotion that the author wants to convey.
Only then can we avoid being confused by superficial forms and truly appreciate the charm of literary works. Only in this way can we build a more inclusive, rational and empathetic environment of communication in a world full of diversity and controversy, where every voice has the opportunity to be heard and understood.
As for the controversy of Dong Yuhui's farewell letter, we need to look at it with an open and inclusive mind. Respect the differences in individual expressions, understand the influence of cultural background, and pay attention to the quality and connotation of the work itself. In this way, we can better appreciate the richness of literary works, promote cultural exchange and integration, and improve our aesthetic level and understanding ability through continuous thinking and discussion.