In today's society, with the rapid development and popularization of the Internet, more and more people choose to report the persecution and injustice they have encountered online with their real names, rather than the traditional local way of reporting or reporting.
Behind this phenomenon, there are multiple and complex reasons and motives, which deserve our in-depth exploration.
### The rise of online real-name reporting
First of all, the rise of online real-name reporting is largely due to the anonymity and dissemination of the Internet. As an open platform, the Internet provides a relatively safe space for whistleblowers to speak out.
Here, whistleblowers can hide their true identity to a certain extent, reducing the risk of retaliation that they may suffer as a result of reporting. At the same time, the rapid dissemination ability of the network enables the rapid spread of reported information, which has aroused widespread attention and public opinion pressure from all walks of life, thus prompting relevant departments to pay attention to and intervene in the investigation.
### Limitations of local reporting or reporting
In contrast, local reporting or reporting often faces a number of limitations. On the one hand, there may be corruption such as collusion between officials and businessmen, power rent-seeking, etc., in some places, resulting in the suppression or ignorance of reported information.
Whistleblowers may fear that their reports will not be dealt with effectively, but will instead lead to unnecessary trouble and retaliation. On the other hand, the procedures of traditional whistleblowing channels are relatively cumbersome, time-consuming, and often the results are not transparent enough, which makes whistleblowers lack confidence and patience.
### Crisis of trust and increased public awareness
In addition, the rise of online real-name reporting also reflects the public's distrust of traditional reporting channels and the improvement of their own rights awareness.
In the era of high information transparency, the public is increasingly aware of the supervision of government departments and public institutions. They are no longer content to passively accept the results, but are more proactive in their search for truth and justice. Online real-name reporting has become one of the important ways for them to express their demands and protect their rights and interests.
### Analysis of the pros and cons of online real-name reporting
Of course, there are also certain drawbacks to online real-name reporting. On the one hand, it may lead to the proliferation of false reports and damage the reputation and rights and interests of the person being reported. On the other hand, over-reliance on online whistleblowing can also undermine the authority and credibility of government departments and public institutions.
Therefore, while encouraging online real-name reporting, it is also necessary to establish a sound regulatory mechanism and legal and regulatory system to ensure the authenticity and validity of the reported information, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the whistleblower and the reported person.
### Conclusion
Therefore, there are many reasons why people now choose to report with their real names online instead of reporting locally when they encounter persecution and injustice. This not only reflects the particularity of the Internet age, but also reflects the public's persistent pursuit of justice and truth.
We should face up to the problems and challenges behind this phenomenon, and actively explore more effective and fair reporting channels and mechanisms to safeguard social fairness and justice.