It is not easy to create, for your better reading experience, click "Follow", and I will update you with entertainment information every day.
The opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics has become the center of global attention, not because it is spectacular, but because it is controversial and even a complete farce.
The opening ceremony was marked by a series of jaw-dropping, low-level mistakes, such as raising the flag and reporting the wrong name, which was simply unbelievable. There are also those controversial images, bearded beauties who can't distinguish their genders, and their images are uncomfortable; The scene of the three pulling and pulling into the room and closing the door is really inexplicable; The big black man hugged the little Asian girl, giving people an inexplicable weirdness and uneasiness; When imitating religious scenes, it is undoubtedly disrespectful to religion to let a fat girl play Jesus; And the sleek fat man in the box pushes vulgarity to new heights.
Ordinary audience members were outraged, accusing the opening ceremony of being a haphazard, disorganized, and porous mess. However, some big Vs and public intellectuals led by Hu Xijin touted it and called it "relaxation". I really don't know where their so-called "relaxation" comes from, is such a chaotic and vulgar presentation of "freedom and equality" in their eyes?
The locals in Paris couldn't bear it anymore and complained loudly: "I paid 30% of the tax and let me see this garbage? "It is true that people pay taxes to enjoy quality service and wonderful events, not this shoddy and unqualified opening ceremony.
The follow-up development is even more staggering. Officials directly removed the video of the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics, and sponsors also withdrew their funds. This is undoubtedly a powerful response to this failed opening ceremony, and it also shows that this vulgar and chaotic presentation is unacceptable.
So, how did all this happen? Is it a deliberate gimmick by the Parisian side in order to attract attention? Or do they really think that such content is called art? We don't know. But what is certain is that the failure of the opening ceremony of this Olympic Games is a wake-up call for both the sports and art worlds.
We need to think about whether we should stick to certain bottom lines and principles in the pursuit of innovation and uniqueness. Should artistic expression respect the feelings of the public and the dignity of culture? What is the value of such "art" if we blindly pursue the so-called "relaxation" and "freedom" while ignoring basic norms and morals?
As for the opening ceremony of the future Olympic Games, we can't help but wonder if the next one will become more conservative because of this defeat in Paris? Or will some organizers ignore the lessons and instead intensify their pursuit of so-called "innovation" to challenge the public's bottom line again? These issues deserve our continued attention and consideration.
In short, the farce of the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics has shown us all kinds of problems in the planning and execution of large-scale events, and it has also made us more clear about the expectations and requirements for artistic and sports activities.
First of all, from a planning perspective, a successful large-scale event should have a clear theme and goals. However, the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics presented chaos and disorder, and there seemed to be no central idea throughout, resulting in a stiff connection between the various links, and it was difficult for the audience to understand its intentions. This may reflect the lack of in-depth thinking and precise positioning of the planning team in the early planning, and did not fully take into account the feelings and expectations of the audience.
When it comes to execution, the devil is in the details. Low-level mistakes such as flag lowering and misnomerization, which should have been completely avoidable, actually happened in such an important situation, which shows that the executive team was grossly negligent and unprofessional in the process of operation. Moreover, those uncomfortable images, such as bearded beauties who can't distinguish gender, and three people entering the room and closing the door, not only did not add any artistic value to the opening ceremony, but made people feel confused and disgusted, which is undoubtedly a mistake in the control of the content in the execution process.
For the presentation of art in sports activities, what we should pursue is an expression that can stimulate people's positive emotions, convey positive energy, and show the beautiful qualities of human beings. However, some scenes in the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics tried to attract attention in a vulgar and bizarre way, which obviously deviated from the essence of art and the spiritual connotation of sports activities.
We look forward to the combination of art and sports, which can not only show the fighting spirit of the athletes, but also bring the audience to the soul through creative and aesthetic forms. For example, wonderful theatrical performances can show the cultural characteristics and historical heritage of the host country; Well-designed stage effects can create a warm and solemn atmosphere; The unique choreography of the athletes' entry session can reflect the unity and friendship of all countries.
At the same time, we require such activities to be highly organized and coordinated. From venue layout to program arrangement, from personnel scheduling to safety assurance, every link needs to be carefully planned and strictly implemented to ensure that the entire event can be carried out smoothly without mistakes.
In addition, the organizer should pay sufficient attention to the feedback and opinions of the audience. After all, the success of an event ultimately depends on what the audience evaluates. If you just work behind closed doors and don't take into account the feelings of the public, then no matter how much resources are invested, it will be difficult to achieve the desired results.
The farce of the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics has undoubtedly sounded a heavy alarm bell for the organizers of large-scale events in the future. In the process of planning and execution, it is important to make every step to the extreme. The theme must be clear, with a clear core idea and distinctive features, so that the audience can understand the main idea of the event at a glance.
The details should be rigorous, to eliminate any possible low-level errors, whether it is the process arrangement or the scene layout, should be carefully polished. The presentation of art should be elegant, avoid vulgar, weird and uncomfortable elements, and truly show the charm and connotation of art. The organizational work should be orderly, and all links should be closely linked and promoted in an orderly manner.
At the same time, the needs and feelings of the audience should be fully considered, as the audience is the final judge of the event. Only by having a deep understanding of their expectations and preferences can we plan and arrange them in a targeted manner. Only in this way will it be possible to hold a truly memorable and positive event, where the charm of art and sports can be perfectly displayed, so as to win the praise and applause of the audience, rather than the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympic Games, which has become a negative teaching material for criticism due to various problems, and brought irreparable damage to the reputation and image of the event.