In the recent gymnastics men's all-around final, Japan's Shinnosuke Oka won the gold medal with 86.832 points, Zhang Boheng won the silver medal with 86.599 points, and Xiao Ruoteng won the bronze medal with 86.364 points.
The result of the match sparked widespread controversy, especially over the judges' rating of China's Zhang Boheng.
Many people believe that Zhang Boheng suffered from the referee's pressure in the game, and the severity of the problem was further amplified in this match.
Before the gymnastics men's all-around final, the duel between Zhang Boheng and Daiki Hashimoto attracted widespread attention.
Both athletes are world-class gymnasts and each has impressive performances.
Before the game, everyone was talking about who would win the championship, and Zhang Boheng's steadfastness and Hashimoto's difficult movements made this match particularly eye-catching.
The competition was quite intense, and both players performed well, and it was hard to tell the difference.
However, when the results came out, it was a surprise.
Shinnosuke Oka won the gold medal with 86.832 points, while Zhang Boheng only won the silver medal with 86.599 points.
Zhang's performance was considered to be quite impressive, and many thought he deserved a higher score.
This feeling is particularly strong because it is reminiscent of the situation at the Tokyo Olympics, when Xiao Ruoteng's gold medal was stolen by Daiki Hashimoto.
Such repeated controversies raise more questions about the fairness of the game.
It is inevitable that people will be uneasy and worry about whether there will be another injustice.
The performance of commentator Chen Ying also became the focus of this game.
As the commentator of CCTV gymnastics, her preference for Daiki Hashimoto in the commentary is too obvious.
Throughout the commentary, Chen Ying focused on almost every move of Hashimoto, whether it was his small mistakes or outstanding performances, she described them in detail.
However, she has paid little attention to the performance of Chinese players Zhang Boheng and Xiao Ruoteng.
Her frequent mentions and high praise of Daiki Hashimoto make people feel that her commentary has completely lost its neutrality.
This situation is particularly dissatisfying, especially on a special day like August 1st Army Day, when everyone hoped to see an unbiased explanation, but instead saw a clearly biased performance.
Many viewers were outraged by this, feeling that this was not only disrespectful to the Chinese athletes, but also disrespectful to the audience's choice.
At this time, many viewers had mixed feelings.
They see the commentator's praise for foreign players, but they almost ignore the performance of their own players.
It's a very uncomfortable feeling, especially for athletes who are all in their game and want a fair evaluation, and this bias and unfair commentary only makes them more disappointed.
Netizens reacted strongly to Chen Ying's explanation, and criticism swept almost the entire Internet.
Some people bluntly said that Chen Ying's commentary has gone beyond the scope of her responsibilities as a commentator and has completely become a spokesperson for pro-Japanese remarks.
A netizen wrote on social media: After reading Chen Ying's commentary, I feel that she is not only favoring Japan players, but also obviously belittling Chinese players. Zhang Boheng and Xiao Ruoteng's performances were completely ignored, which was really annoying to watch.
Another netizen mentioned: Chen Ying praised every action of Daiki Hashimoto during the commentary, and almost did not mention Zhang Boheng's wonderful performance. This style of commentary is really unfair, everyone can see it clearly, why did she do this? This raises serious doubts about her professionalism.
Some netizens even expressed their dissatisfaction in a ridiculous tone: Chen Ying's explanation is simply the level of Japan TV, which makes people angry. She was on her knees with praise for Daiki Hashimoto, but her evaluation of the Chinese player was understated. It felt like she didn't have the slightest respect for our athletes.
In some comment areas, netizens began to ridicule Chen Ying's close relationship with Japan athletes.
Someone wrote: If Chen Ying likes Daiki Hashimoto, go directly to Japan, and we don't have to listen to her explanation.
If it continues like this, it will only be more disappointing.
The focus of the discussion was not only on the content of Chen Ying's explanation, but also on her attitude.
Netizens generally feel that this obvious bias and unfair commentary has smeared Chinese athletes and hurt the feelings of the audience.
Netizens' opinions on this commentator are very direct, reflecting their strong dissatisfaction.
Many feel that Chen Ying's explanation not only loses its impartiality, but is also full of obvious bias.
A netizen said in the comments: Chen Ying's explanation is really laughable. Her praise for the Japanese contestant makes people think that she is a staff member of Japan TV rather than a Chinese commentator. Zhang Boheng and Xiao Ruoteng's performances were completely ignored, which made people feel very uncomfortable.
Another netizen posted on the Internet: Seeing Chen Ying every time he mentioned Daiki Hashimoto, that excited tone made me feel sick. She exaggerated most of Hashimoto's movements, but she seemed careless about the Chinese player's every effort. Such a commentary is simply disrespectful to Chinese athletes.
Some netizens ridiculed Chen Ying's commentary style: I feel that when Chen Ying explains, it is like advertising Hashimoto Daiki.
Her tone and description are exaggerated, and even Hashimoto's big mistake can be said to be like a victory. This is really unfair!
During the discussion, some people raised more acute questions: Does Chen Ying have any special relationship with Japan? Her commentary was completely on the side of the Japanese athletes, ignoring the performance of our athletes. Could it be that her job is to add points to the Japan player? This style of commentary is really frustrating.
The voices of netizens are unanimous, and they all believe that this biased commentary not only damages the fairness of the game, but also hurts the feelings of the audience.
They hope that there will be more objective and fair explanations in the future, so that every hard-working athlete can get the evaluation they deserve.
These controversies are not only accusations against Chen Ying personally, but also reflect the public's high concern about the fairness of sports commentary.
What people want to see is a fair and objective explanation, not a clearly biased commentary.
Chen Ying's performance this time undoubtedly made people have more doubts about her future commentary work.
Welcome to leave your valuable comments and opinions in the comment area, and look forward to discussing with you.
Note: It is not easy to be original, plagiarism and manuscript washing, and it will be studied deeply. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete