On the 29th, at a press conference of Russia press spokeswoman Zakharova, the Associated Press reporter accused the killing of the top United States military commander in the Middle East by Russia bombers in Gaza as a serious military provocation. Zakharova said that the Russia bomber simply had a mechanical failure and had to unload the bomb. The Associated Press reporter said that the United States government believes that this is too unprofessional and could easily lead to a direct escalation of friction between the two sides. Zakharova was noncommittal. This news caused a mockery among the global netizens: Is Russia "too unprofessional" or "too special"?!
On the 31st, Hamas leader Haniyeh was killed in an attack while attending the inauguration ceremony of Iran's president. Iran directly said that it was done by United States and Israel, and vowed to retaliate in reciprocal terms.
On August 1, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, said that "peace is possible only with all-out war" in the Middle East. The exact words were: "The dead knot in the Middle East is tightening." I feel sorry for the innocent deceased. They are just hostages of the abominable country of United States. At the same time, it is clear to all that all-out war is the only way to a fragile peace in the region. ”
By contrast, both the United States and Israel were silent about the death of Chania. United States Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said he had nothing to say about the death of the Hamas leader and related to Israel. The Israel military also said they "do not respond to media reports of the death of Chaniyeh." The Jerusalem Post, Israel's most influential media outlet, reported that the Israel government had instructed its ministers not to comment on the attack on the death of the Hamas leader.
The top U.S. military commander in the Middle East was killed by Russia, and Russia admitted that it was a "too unprofessional" mechanical failure and that it was a "too professional" decapitation operation. Hamas leaders were killed in Iran, and neither United States nor Israel admitted that they had done it. Both sides are playing tricks, and the targets are all aimed at the top leaders or top military commanders of the two sides at the forefront of the Palestinian-Israeli war, and they have also accurately hit the targets.
The terrible fact is not that the beheadings or murders are taking place, but that both the United States and Russia have in fact deployed military forces in Gaza and are clearly involved in the Israeli-Palestinian war.
Is this a cold war or a hot war, or is it a proxy war or a direct war between the two sides?
It seems that it is neither the former, but also half a step away from the latter.
Without the First World War, there might not have been a Second World War, which began with the assassination of an important political figure second only to the country's top leader. The situation now seems to have reached the tipping point of initiating a world war.
The Russian-Ukrainian war has been fought to this day, and no one will think that a world war has come, but the Palestinian-Israeli war has been fought to this day, and people seem to have seen that the world war is getting closer and closer. Why is that?
The world is becoming more and more crazy, ostensibly because of United States, and deep because of Israel. The reason is simple: the foundation of United States is the dollar, and it is the Jewish consortium that controls the dollar. With United States inevitably in decline, Jewish conglomerates must either find a new host or strengthen their own homeland, Israel, the father of United States. At the moment, they are clearly opting for the latter.
From Trump to Biden, United States's number one enemy has not been dragged into the war by United States, but has United States itself into the quagmire of war. Why is that?
The world was originally designed or planned, at least since World War II. It's just that today's world has become a world where design doesn't evolve as fast as it comes, and plans don't change as fast.
Whether the designer or planner of this is United States or not, or whether it is the United States's own father and Israel, it is clear that the Zionists today are aware that the realization of their grand Israel plan is becoming increasingly elusive. Because of this, they become more and more impatient, more and more impatient to seize the last chance, even if this last chance may also be the window of time for total destruction. Just as the possibility and room for maneuver for Taiwan independence are getting smaller and smaller, but Taiwan independence is becoming more and more frenzied, they know that they must seize the last opportunity, even if this last opportunity is more likely to be the window of time for their own destruction.
Russia is actually the most sober, and Medvedev's speech is blunt and correct. That place in the Middle East used to be a powder keg, but now it is a powder keg that has been ignited. Since the United States and Britain designed the establishment of Israel in the Middle East, they have planted permanent landmines in the Middle East, and Israel's decades of territorial expansion and genocidal policies have long covered the landmines. There can be no peace without a baptism of blood and fire, without one side being completely subdued.
The 14 Palestinian factions had only just begun to form a united front when the Hamas leader was murdered. Whatever the motive for the murder, the objective consequence must be that the newly united Palestinian factions are about to be put to the test in no uncertain terms.
The unity of all Palestinian factions is the premise and foundation for the establishment of an independent state, and the destruction of the unity of the Palestinians is obviously aimed at preventing the process of Palestinian statehood and using actual acts of war to veto the "two-state solution" agreed upon by all countries in the world except the United States and Israel. This sinister motive has been laid bare in plain sight.
The two-state solution is the most direct obstacle to the Zionist dream of Greater Israel, so Israel has repeatedly said that the United Nations should be dissolved. What does it mean to dissolve the United Nations?
Of course, it means the complete abolition of the existing international rules and order, that is, the abolition of the legal basis for peace in the Middle East and throughout the world, as a secondary road to all-out war.
At present, Israel actually only wants to do one thing, pull United States together to bloody the Middle East, fight off the last bit of United States strength to build a great Israel state, and create new and greater vitality for the Jews and Israel after the decline of United States.
Peace can only be achieved in the Middle East through all-out war, which is not only the perception of Russia, but also the cognition of United States, and the basic cognition of Israel. The only difference is that Israel insists on fighting a big fight, while United States is somewhat helpless and somewhat timid. After all, today's United States is no longer what it used to be, and it does not have the absolute global military superiority that it had in the five Middle East wars.
Russia cannot allow Israel and United States to dominate the Middle East because the Middle East is no less important to Russia than Ukraine. For Russia, Ukraine is related to the geopolitical pattern and national security strategy, while the Middle East is a matter of economic security and interest pattern for Russia. China, the United States, and Russia are the power triangle of international politics, while Russia, United States, and the Middle East are the power triangle of international energy interests. For the United States and Russia, whoever sides in the Middle East controls the power to price energy. Therefore, Russia will definitely stand on the opposite side of Israel and United States to seize the right to speak and control the Middle East.
In fact, the big countries in the East are not in the energy triangle, but as the world's largest energy consumers, the big countries in the East are obviously the countries that are most concerned about the energy pattern and interests, and it is impossible for them to let the Middle East go unchecked. In Russia's struggle with NATO, the position of the eastern powers is clear: opposing hegemony and opposing the model of group fighting. However, on the Middle East issue, the big countries in the East are more on their own side, hoping for peace in the Middle East and competition in energy prices rather than monopoly.
Looking at the problem from this angle, among the three major powers, the eastern powers may be the only ones that really want peace in the Middle East. But unfortunately, Israel, United States, and Russia are all pushing for a full-scale war in the Middle East, especially Israel. Israel's goal is not energy, but territory, and it is the parasitic right of Jewish capital to further control the territory and resources of the Middle East after losing the hegemony of the dollar.
With this clearly understood, the future wrestling between the major powers will inevitably focus on the Middle East, and the conclusion that an all-out war in the Middle East is inevitable will be established.
Original Xiao Zhonghua Xiao Zhonghua gave a lecture