Click to follow ➕ and share, your wallet will rise every day!
Cover a variety of topics and share a variety of discussions
Use unbridled thinking to write unique reviews
Take a look, think about it, talk about it
Focus on having something new to talk about every day
Today's new conversations:
What are some moments in history that show that "a weak country has no diplomacy"?
Political old fritters, history tells us how much the Japanese grovel to you today, and how hard they will treat you tomorrow.
Obama also gave a grand gift to the tomb of the emperor of Japan
is jaw-dropping, they can only say that they are really half a catty and eight taels, a huge number of etiquette mistakes
At its largest, Yelang was larger than Korea
Hua Guo: Then it seems that I also have something, although I received the consolation prize after the failure of the Qin State to attack Zheng Guo
The first example is that it cannot be said that a weak country has no diplomacy, this is lying on the back to taste courage and bear the burden of humiliation, this is real diplomacy.
The second example, not diplomacy! Not diplomacy! Not diplomacy! Again, Taiwan is part of China.
577 can stand firm in this kind of powder keg country, the political means are really powerful, and I also know what countries like to watch, United States likes to see him "whisper", China likes to see him "worry about the country and the people"
For three days in a row, six Y-20s, flew to Serbia to deliver FK-3 anti-aircraft missiles.
Why didn't NATO intercept it? Do you not want to or don't dare?
Although it is also the year of Gengzi, the abacus of the foreign cabinet is wrong
My classmate had just gone to study in United Kingdom that year, and was on his way back from class
I met a few high school students who kept insulting and spitting behind him
Believe it or not, once we are weakened, those bandits will re-sign those treaties from more than a hundred years ago
The sentence structure is not quite right.
The opening chapter, "Four Years of the United States Rare Sect", indicates that the quotation is from United States historical materials, and the opening chapter should be "Four Years of Rare Princes" before the etiquette collapsed to the point of being the king and hegemon. Putin should also be a public rather than an emperor, but because the US official is dissatisfied with Putin's fight against Ukraine, he should be a Russian public but not a public one, and Hou is condemned. As for Kim Jong-un, he cannot be called a marquis, but a bo. The last two sentences write "Russian Marquis Yurong Yu Chaobo"
Full text, the fourth year of the Duke of Xi, the Russian Marquis Yu Rong Yu Chaobo
The stronger will only draw their swords and point at the stronger
The weak will only draw their knives and swing them at the weaker
Needless to say, there are too many positive and negative examples. We have not been rude in the area of diplomacy, but there are still differences in treatment, because diplomacy is part of the extension of national interests
Didn't study modern Chinese history? Don't know about the Paris Peace Treaty? How could such a thing be said
First, the law of the jungle is a typical law of the jungle, which is not suitable for the contemporary society under the rule of law
Second, the international community is really a huge jungle
The law of the jungle is a cruel law of nature, a contest between life and death
A weak country has no diplomacy, it is an attitude, a kind of attitude that I like you to see me unhappy and can't beat me, this feeling is more like an insult, something that belongs to human emotions
It's hard to say Bhutan, this country's foreign policy is completely on par with India, and there is a Sikkim on the side of this country before, how can it not be found on the map