Friends, let's talk about a topic that makes people a little "heart blocked", blood donation!
Did you know? Recently, the big experts in the hospital are so anxious that they say that young people nowadays, especially our energetic group, why do they suddenly "love to ignore" the matter of blood donation?
The blood bank is urgent, it is difficult to use blood, and the expert directly named and said that young people lack so much "sense of social responsibility", but the truth is not so simple!
Look at this, the Health Commission shouts every day that "donating blood is glorious, save people's lives", but as a result, there are fewer and fewer people willing to donate blood.
In the comment area, netizens complained, and every sentence revealed their helplessness and coldness. Let's listen to what netizens have to say and explore the story behind it.
A netizen who claimed to be a "veteran driver of blood donation" said that he had donated blood so many times, but once he needed blood, he had to pay for it himself! The reversal of this plot is even more bloody than the TV series.
He said with emotion: "The enthusiasm when I used to donate blood has now turned into ice in my heart. ”
In this era of information overflow, we are surrounded by various news and social events every day. But a recent report about blood donation has caught particular attention and tugged at people's heartstrings. The urgency of blood stocks is not only related to the lives of many seriously ill patients, but also touches the moral bottom line of our society.
However, it is shocking that some experts angrily point out that many people have chosen to "maliciously not donate blood"! This behavior not only exacerbates the strain on blood banks, but also triggers a wide discussion about social responsibility and personal obligations.
"Maliciously not donating blood"? That word sounds too heavy. What exactly do you mean by "malicious"? Is it because people are unwilling to donate blood, or because of those chilling regulations?
Honestly, who wouldn't want to reach out and donate blood to save lives? But the question is, after we donate blood, can we ensure that we can use it smoothly when we or our families need it? Obviously, the answer is no.
It's like when you bring food to others every day, but when you're hungry, you don't even have a mouthful of soup, who can accept this situation?
In addition, donating blood is a voluntary act, not an obligation. You can't just put the blame on the people just because the blood bank is tight. Instead of accusing the people of "bad faith", it is better to spend some effort to improve the blood donation system and ensure that the rights and interests of blood donors are truly protected.
Some people donate blood and feel disappointed because they don't get the benefits they deserve, some people feel helpless because of the cumbersome certification process, and some people find it difficult to spare time to donate blood because they are busy with work. This feedback forces us to reflect: Is our blood donation system really people-centered?
Blood donation is supposed to be a selfless dedication, a relay race between lives. But in real life, it is often limited by various rules and regulations. The enthusiasm of blood donors is often undermined by unreasonable regulations and complicated procedures. This makes people ask: does our society really give enough respect and rewards to blood donors?
In fact, the reasons behind the year-on-year decline in the number of blood donations are complex and varied, and not only because of changes in personal wishes. In our large eastern country, the public's enthusiasm for blood donation has always been very high, and everyone will actively participate in whenever the society needs it, for example, during the fight against the new crown pneumonia epidemic, everyone's enthusiasm for blood donation is very obvious.
So why is the number of blood donations still decreasing year by year? This is mainly due to the fact that there are still many problems with the current blood donation mechanism. For example, blood donors often face high costs when they need it, and the lack of preferential treatment is a serious disincentive for them. In addition, there is a certain amount of discrimination in the use of blood donation cards in different regions, which directly affects the enthusiasm and willingness of blood donors.
Although donating blood is not harmful to the body and is even beneficial to boost metabolism, in recent years, the number of people willing to donate blood has gradually decreased.
Some people have suggested improving the blood donation mechanism to increase the feedback to blood donors, but will this really solve the current blood donation problem?
His proposal includes several key points, the first of which is to establish a policy of prioritizing the use of blood. This means that blood donors register their personal information when donating blood and can give priority to their own blood or some kind of priority when they need a blood transfusion in the future.
Such a policy is designed to give back directly to those who donate blood voluntarily, so that they feel that their selfless dedication can be actually helped when necessary.
In 2018, Ms. Zhang stood in front of the microphone of the TV column group with a helpless wry smile on her face. Her mother suddenly became seriously ill and was in urgent need of a blood transfusion.
Ms. Zhang thought that she had been donating blood for nearly 9 years, and it should be very convenient when she needed to use blood. However, when she was in dire need of help, the blood bank repeatedly refused her requests because she could not immediately prove her relationship with her mother.
Ms. Zhang has been donating blood for nine years, and now her mother is seriously ill and needs surgery, which requires a large blood transfusion.
According to the policy, relatives should be able to enjoy the benefits of free blood transfusions, but when she went to the blood bank with hope for help, she was denied. The reason given by the blood bank was incomprehensible – she was asked to prove her relationship with her mother.
Ms. Zhang's mind was full of questions: Why was there never so many complicated requirements when she first donated blood? Now my mother is in desperate need of blood, but she has to face such a ridiculous demand to prove that "my mother is my mother".
Isn't that just embarrassing? It's like a scoundrel.
As a result, Ms. Zhang made several trips, one to the police station in her own jurisdiction and one to the police station in her mother's jurisdiction, hoping to quickly get the required certificates.
However, the police stations in both places told her that because she and her mother had a record of moving out, they could not directly issue a certificate of relationship.
However, a police officer from the police station in Ms. Zhang's area gave her a glimmer of hope, pointing out that Ms. Zhang's first move-out record was enough to prove that she had been a member of her mother's household registration, and that no additional supporting documents were needed.
However, when Ms. Zhang returned to the blood bank with the news, hope was shattered again. The staff at the blood bank still stuck to their original position, telling her that it was still not possible.
At the end of the day, there are indeed many loopholes and irrationalities in our blood donation mechanism.
First, with regard to "the treatment that blood donors and their families deserve", this promise must be kept. We need to truly implement preferential policies such as preferential blood use and fee waivers for blood donors and their families, so that those who selflessly donate can truly feel the care and warmth from the society when they or their families urgently need blood.
Second, a nationwide networked blood donation certificate system should be established to realize the sharing and flow of blood bank resources, eliminate geographical boundaries, and ensure that all blood donors can enjoy the rights and interests of priority medical treatment in accordance with the law.
At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen the disclosure of the flow of blood in hospitals to ensure transparency, so that everyone can see that every drop of blood is being used rationally and effectively.
Blood donation is a good thing, but don't let the well-wishers down because of the loopholes in the system.
If these problems can be solved, I believe that everyone is still willing to roll up their sleeves and participate enthusiastically! So, what do you think about blood donation?
Hurry up and post your views in the comments section and let's discuss together. Maybe a small suggestion from you can be the key to improving this situation!
[Disclaimer] The time, event process and pictures involved in this article are all from the Internet, which is used to spread positive energy, without any vulgar or bad guidance. Readers are asked not to generalize, and not to fall into unnecessary behavior such as personal attacks. Please be rational in dealing with this incident, and don't believe in malicious comments based on subjective assumptions, the Internet is not an illegal place. If you have any questions about the authenticity of this article, the copyright of the event or the infringement of the picture, please contact the author in time, and we will actively deal with it.