laitimes

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

Loading...

What a big deal this time for United States! 1.6 billion US dollars, equivalent to 11.2 billion yuan, such a large sum of money was thrown out like this. It is said that it is to be used to "counter China's malicious influence", but how to fight it and where to use it is really confusing. This matter is quite a big one, but when you look into it, it's really confusing.

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

An unexplained "luxury party"

That's a lot of fun to say. The United States Congress recently passed the $1.6 billion appropriation resolution, but in fact, the money began to be used as early as October 2022. Now, it was like holding an unexplained "luxury party", and only after the guests finished did they remember to ask the boss.

It is said that the money is mainly used to counter the so-called "malign influence of China". But what exactly this "malicious influence" refers to, the United States has not made clear. Do you feel that China's development is too fast for them to feel uncomfortable? Or do you simply want to find a reason to suppress China? Who can say this clearly.

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

It is said that only a few MPs know what this money is for. Fortunately, most people are kept in the dark, and even the people who spend the money themselves don't know where the money goes. This can't help but make people wonder whether this money is really used to "fight China", or has it been filled by some people?

The small abacus of the United States crackled

To be honest, United States played this trick quite slippery. They may feel that by throwing money around, they can influence other people's perceptions. But this is too underestimated, right? Could it be that the eyes of people all over the world are clear, and they will be easily blinded by money?

The United States has a bunch of domestic problems, inflation has made the people cry bitterly, the unemployment rate remains high, and the gap between the rich and the poor is widening. At this time, I don't want to solve my own problems, but I am playing some game of "confronting China" here, isn't this putting the cart before the horse?

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

Some United States media can't stand it either. The New York Times, for example, reported that United States' approach could backfire and make more people suspicious of United States' behavior. This makes sense, after all, no one likes to be fooled.

Information warfare? Or is it self-deception?

In doing so, the United States is, to put it bluntly, trying to fight an information war. They may feel that as long as they have the upper hand in public opinion, they can gain an advantage in international competition. But the question is, does this really work?

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

It's the age of the Internet, and information travels very fast. As soon as the United States released a piece of news, it spread all over the world in the blink of an eye. People have their own judgment, and it's not like you can sway other people's minds by paying a few media outlets.

Moreover, there are big problems with this practice in itself. Isn't using money to influence public opinion a disguised manipulation of public opinion? The United States has always touted itself as a model of "press freedom", so isn't it a slap in the face?

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

It's also worth noting that this practice may provoke resentment in other countries. After all, no one wants to be taken for a fool by others. If United States really does this, I am afraid that it will cause more countries to be dissatisfied and damage its international image.

How far can money diplomacy go?

In the final analysis, United States is a classic form of "money diplomacy". They may feel that they can solve the problem by simply throwing money at it. But the question is, how can international relations be so simple?

Looking back at history, similar examples are not uncommon. For example, during the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union often provided assistance to other countries in various ways in an attempt to win over allies. But the result? Relationships that are held together by money are often not strong enough and tend to collapse when there is a conflict of interest.

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

Now that we are the 21st century, international relations have long been more than a matter of losing and winning. Countries are becoming more and more interconnected and interdependent. In this case, relying solely on money to influence others may not be very effective.

Some experts have pointed out that this approach may be counterproductive United States. They believe that instead of spending a lot of money to influence others, they should spend the money on improving themselves. After all, a country's soft power comes more from its own development and progress, rather than from money.

epilogue

United States' approach this time is indeed a bit incredible. $1.6 billion is not a small amount. If it is really used to improve people's livelihood and develop the economy, I don't know how many good things can be done. But it is really incomprehensible to use it to engage in such an inexplicable "confrontation".

Who took United States $1.6 billion of black China's money? United States media: China and the United States are rich and strong together

In the final analysis, real influence is won by strength and charisma, not by money. If the United States really wants to have greater influence in the international community, it is better to spend more effort on its own development, solve domestic problems, and improve its soft power. That's how you can win the respect and recognition of more people, isn't it?

The above content is from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing will be studied deeply. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.

For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!

Read on