There was an accident in a technician school in Yunnan, and a car driving in the school suddenly crashed into 3 students, and it was revealed that the driver's identity was not ordinary after the incident-
Not only is he the director of the school's student office, but he is also suspected of drunk driving!
After the incident, the school's external response caused another controversy - it did not call the police at the first time, but reported to the principal to "discuss and deal with it"?
What can this be discussed? If you get involved in a drunk driving accident, you can go directly to the police uncle, what does it mean to report to the principal?
Now, things are really getting bigger...... (Click to view video)
Loading...
The incident happened on the evening of September 27, on the campus of Yunnan Escort Technician College.
Someone drove a car on campus and hit three students.
It can be seen from the exposed video that near the school gate, a car with flashing tail lights was surrounded by many people, and exclamations broke out in the crowd from time to time......
After the incident was exposed on the Internet, it attracted attention.
One of the reasons why its popularity has not diminished is that some netizens broke the news that the car driver was the director of the school's student office, and he was drunk driving at the time!
On the one hand, the identity of the driver has attracted great attention, and on the other hand, the reply of the school staff has "caused trouble" again.
On September 28, some media directly approached the school's staff to inquire about the matter, and the reply received was somewhat surprising......
"We are reporting to the principal and discussing with the principal......"
Well, why does that sound a little wrong?
Whether it is the director of the student department or not, drunk driving hits someone, this should be reported to the traffic police immediately! Why did the school report to the principal in the first place?
Could it be that the principal is still a "traffic policeman"?
"We are discussing"? What's negotiable? Could it be that it was late at night to discuss countermeasures? Discuss how to smooth out the bad effects of the incident?
However, as the heat of the incident further increased, the identity of the driver was "reversed" again.
On September 29, when the school staff responded to the media again, they gave this statement about the identity of the driver-
"It is clear that his (the driver's) identity is not the director of the Student Affairs Office at this time, and the questions about the student's injuries and whether he was drunk and driving on campus are subject to the official report."
The school denied that the driver was the director of the Student Division, at least "not right now"!
Immediately afterwards, some netizens "proved" the identity of the driver again in the comment area - he is not the director!
According to this "insider":
The driver, who was only a general staff member of the Student Affairs Department, inadvertently collided with three students that night because the road section he passed through was doing fire protection engineering and the lighting environment was not good, causing minor injuries to the students. At present, the school has reported to the police, and various departments are dealing with the investigation......
See? Whether the driver's identity is the "Dean of Students" seems to be a very important piece of information......
In fact, the news point of this kind of incident is indeed in the details of the "Director of Student Affairs", if there is no title of leader, this matter will not stir up much turmoil, and anyone with a discerning eye understands it.
Judging from the replies from all parties, it is speculated that this person's identity is probably related to the "director", but is it taking a back seat? Or is there another reason? We can only wait for the official announcement of the police......
Fortunately, the students were all slightly injured, which can be regarded as a blessing in misfortune!