At the end of the game, the score was fixed at 84-83.
In the CBA preseason, the Guangdong team narrowly defeated the Sichuan team by 1 point away from home and won the game.
Normally, a game with such a scorching score should be very exciting, or at least very tense.
However, fans who have actually watched the whole game know that most of the credit for the two teams being able to play this situation goes to the referees on the spot.
If it weren't for their "super high-level" performance, this result would not have been possible.
For this, I believe many fans are also commonplace.
After all, fans who often watch CBA games, who still don't understand the "undertone" of the referee.
However, what I didn't expect was that this game was upgraded again.
For example, there have been many games that have been more clearly biased in favor of one team over the other.
Then, at the crucial moment, go and repeatedly deliver penalties that can directly affect the outcome of the game.
The team that should have won was annoyed and angry, and even made a big fuss on the scene.
However, the magic of this game is that many of the contents that even laymen can see, but the professional referees on the scene directly gave the "wrong judgment".
For example, blowing a step is a foul.
Another example is to give the ball directly to the opponent.
In other words, they were all biased towards one side before, but this time they began to favor both sides.
Is this telling the Guangdong team and the Sichuan team that in this game, whoever wants to win can win?
No wonder some fans say that the NBA is just to watch a game, and the real basketball game has to be the CBA.
For so many years we have been summing up this and that question.
Saying that the talent of the players is declining, saying that the ability of the players is declining, saying that the players are not working hard enough, saying that the attitude of the players is not right, and so on.
So why hasn't anyone said anything about this referee?
Of course, no one here said that it did not mean that there was no media and fans who said it, on the contrary, everyone had a very big problem with the referee.
However, at the official level, this issue has not been taken seriously, or even evaded.
That's it, when the referee exchange meeting of the new season was held two days ago, there was still a face to talk about Xu Jie's defensive scale.
Note that this is not to say that Xu Jie's defense is no problem, and if there is a problem, it should not be raised, but to say that if our referees are really very professional, we dare not expect each of them to be the top existence at the international level.
At least the vast majority of referees are able to meet the professional standards.
So for Xu Jie's obvious defensive problems, he has already achieved effective "changes".
The simplest, as long as Xu Jie dares to appear on the field with those "additional actions", it is directly a whistle.
There were a few games in a row that blew penalties, and he took the initiative to know how to converge.
There is one of the most important "premises" here, that is, the thinking of all referees should be unified, and it is clear that Xu Jie's actions are foul actions and are not allowed.
However, some referees are clear, and some referees are confused.
As a result, some games were blown and some referees were not.
This made Xu Jie feel that his actions were not so "bad", and he might be in a "gray area".
To put it bluntly, it was the referee's "incompetence" that misled Xu Jie.
In other words, it was the referee who connived at Xu Jie's continuation of the "foul".
Just imagine, if the overall level of our referees can be improved, not only Xu Jie, but also many of the remaining players can understand what kind of actions are standard, otherwise, it is absolutely not allowed, and once it is made, it will have to pay the price.
Then when you go to the international arena, you don't have to be so foreign.
Many good situations will not be reversed because of some low-level mistakes and fouls.
So, the referee question, when will it be closed?