The phenomenon of "lying flat" among employees of state-owned enterprises: helplessness or personal choice within the system?
Recently, the topic of "lying flat" among employees of state-owned enterprises has exploded on the Internet. To be honest, as an ordinary person, I'm curious about what the hell is going on. After all, state-owned enterprises are golden jobs in the eyes of many people, how can someone not do a good job?
The Origin of Lying Flat: From "996" to "9 to 5"
Speaking of the word "lying flat", it is one of the hot words in 2024. In the beginning, it was used by young people to describe the attitude of not wanting to work hard and pursuing a comfortable life. Unexpectedly, this trend actually blew into the door of state-owned enterprises.
If you want to say why the employees of state-owned enterprises want to lie flat, you have to start from the beginning. In the past few years, Internet companies have prevailed in the "996" work system, and everyone is working overtime. But what happens in the end? Many people have collapsed physically, and they have not been exchanged for high-paying jobs. As a result, some people began to envy the 9-to-5 and weekend work in state-owned enterprises.
However, after entering a state-owned enterprise, some people find that the situation is not as good as they imagined. A friend who works in a large state-owned enterprise complained to me: "I clock in at 9 a.m. every day and leave at 5 p.m. on time." It looks easy, but it's very embarrassing! "
The crux of lying flat: structural problems within the system
So what is it that makes employees of state-owned enterprises feel aggrieved? I think there are several main reasons:
The first is the uneven distribution of work. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are huge, and the responsibilities of many departments are not clear. Some people are so busy that their feet don't touch the ground, while others spend all day doing nothing. A colleague told me, "There are several people in our department, but I and two other people do the work. Others drink tea and chat every day, and the leaders don't care. "
The second is limited opportunities for promotion. Many people who rely on their own ability to enter state-owned enterprises find that there is no hope of promotion after working for a few years. "I thought I would be able to make a big difference when I joined a state-owned enterprise, but it turned out that it was not like that at all. Relations are leaders as soon as they come, and it is too difficult for us ordinary employees to climb up. A friend said helplessly.
Then there is the imperfect reward mechanism. The wage structure of state-owned enterprises is relatively fixed, and the proportion of performance pay is not high. This leads to the fact that no matter how hard you work, the salary is just like that. An employee of a state-owned enterprise told me: "There is an old fritter in our department, who fishes all day long, and his salary is about the same as mine. Why do I have to work so hard? "
Finally, there is the impact of interpersonal relationships. In state-owned enterprises, building a good relationship with leaders is often more important than work ability. "I have a colleague who is very good at doing things, and he goes around the leader all day long. Although the work ability is average, the promotion is faster than anyone else. A friend said sourly.
The impact of lying flat: from individuals to entire industries
The employees of state-owned enterprises lie flat, and the impact is not small. The first is that it is not good for the development of the individual. While it may be easier in the short term, in the long run, a lack of competitiveness will make you more and more passive in the workplace.
For enterprises, the general lack of employee motivation will definitely affect work efficiency and innovation ability. I've heard that some SOEs are slow to move forward with new projects because no one is willing to take responsibility.
From the perspective of the industry, if the phenomenon of employees lying flat in state-owned enterprises is widespread, it will be difficult to occupy an advantage in market competition. In particular, some industries that compete directly with private enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises are more likely to be surpassed by their opponents.
How to Solve the Lying Flat Dilemma: Reform or Self-Breakthrough?
Faced with the problem of employees of state-owned enterprises lying flat, I think it is not enough for employees to be conscious. After all, under the existing system, many people choose to lie down and have no choice but to do so.
From the perspective of enterprise management, a more fair and transparent promotion and reward mechanism should be established. Let those who are truly capable and willing to do things get the rewards they deserve. At the same time, it is also necessary to break down departmental barriers and optimize work processes to avoid the situation that some people are busy to death and some people are idle and panicked.
For individual employees, instead of complaining, it is better to take the initiative to look for opportunities. For example, you can use your spare time to learn new skills, or try to participate in some important projects to improve your irreplaceability.
I have a friend who does just that. He works in a state-owned enterprise, but he is always learning new things. Now he has become the technical backbone of the department, not only has his salary increased a lot, but also more opportunities for promotion.
Lie flat or struggle, how do you choose?
To put it bluntly, the phenomenon of employees of state-owned enterprises lying flat is still a game of institutional problems and personal choices. If the system is not reformed, it will be difficult for individuals to be motivated; But if everyone chooses to lie flat, it will be more difficult to change the system.
What do you think employees of state-owned enterprises should do? Is it to be content with the status quo and live a stable life, or to actively look for a breakthrough? This is a question worth pondering for everyone. After all, life is short for a few decades, and you still have to rely on your own ideas on how to spend it.