Evaluating professional titles, an important level in the workplace, not only carries the weight of personal honor and dreams, but also implies various conditions and restrictions. For the majority of professional and technical personnel, whether it is education, engineering, health or economic management and other fields, the evaluation of professional titles has almost become a yardstick to measure professional achievements and status. However, under this ruler, there are many helpless "thresholds".
Academic qualifications and years of experience seem to be the two locks on the door of the evaluation of professional titles. Academic qualifications, a stepping stone, play a pivotal role in the evaluation of professional titles. A high degree of education often means more opportunities and a higher starting point, but this also discourages many people with low education, lamenting that "heroes are useless". And the working years are like a strict old man, silently looking at your every step behind your back. Without sufficient qualifications, it is difficult to cross this "threshold" even if the ability is strong.
The evaluation examination and thesis requirements are a headache for many professional and technical personnel. The evaluation examination, the "college entrance examination" in the workplace, not only tests the professional knowledge and skills of individuals, but also tests the mentality and perseverance. The publication of a paper is like a difficult mountain to climb, which is daunting. The quality, quantity, and grade of the journal are all rigorous tests for researchers. For the job title, how many people stay up late to write papers, just for that thin piece of paper.
The "high threshold" of the monograph makes the evaluation of senior professional titles out of reach. The monograph, the culmination of this personal academic achievement, not only requires the researcher to have a profound academic background and comprehensive research ability, but also requires sufficient financial and resource support. For ordinary professional and technical personnel, monograph publishing is often an unbearable burden. Looking at those colleagues who were successfully promoted because of their monographs, many people could only shake their heads and sigh helplessly.
The process of evaluating professional titles is full of helplessness and hardship. The restrictions on academic qualifications, the constraints of the number of years, the pressure of exams, the troubles of papers, and the "high threshold" of monographs all make people feel pressure. However, these "thresholds" are not insurmountable. In desperation, we might as well reflect on it: what is the purpose of evaluating job titles? Is it to measure an individual's professional achievement and status, or to promote personal growth and development?
Perhaps, we should pay more attention to the actual abilities and contributions of individuals, rather than relying too much on these external "thresholds". Although academic qualifications are important, ability is even more crucial; Although the years are long, the results speak more; Although the exam is difficult, it can be broken with hard work; Although there are many papers, quality is king; Although the monograph is high, it is not the only one. On the road of evaluating professional titles, we should pay more attention to the all-round development and growth of individuals, so that professional titles can truly become a fair yardstick to measure our professional achievements and status.
In short, although the "threshold" for evaluating professional titles is high, it is not insurmountable. As long as we maintain a positive attitude, strive to improve ourselves, and have the courage to face challenges, I believe that one day we will be able to cross this "threshold" and usher in our own professional glory.