The treasure blogger "Tingquan Jianbao" has recently sparked heated discussions, involving topics such as academic qualifications and whether the tomb robber's microphone is a script. On October 15, he posted a video in response to rumors of academic fraud. The person in charge of Tingquan Jianbao's company emphasized that the suspension was for rest, and the academic qualifications were not forged, nor did they use the "Peking University" label for marketing. The person in charge said that the rebroadcast time will depend on the health of the blogger. "Brother Quan" broadcasts live for a long time every day, and staying up too late affects the body, so he needs to recuperate for a period of time. The suspension was mainly due to physical reasons.
The first question: What do Tingquan Jianbao fans think?
This response sparked heated discussions among netizens, some supported "Brother Quan" to rest and recuperate, and some questioned his words. In this regard, netizens expressed concern about the health of bloggers, but still have doubts about academic qualifications, and called on relevant departments to verify this. At the same time, some fans have left messages of support, hoping that "Brother Quan" will recover as soon as possible and return to the live broadcast site.
The "Listening to the Spring Treasure Appreciation" incident continues to ferment, and netizens' attention to bloggers has not decreased. His return, how to deal with academic qualifications, and improve the live broadcast schedule have become the focus of most concern for fans. Let's wait and see how "Brother Quan" performs in the future.
The second question: Netizens still question Tingquan Jianbao?
Recently, there have been many doubts about a treasure appreciation program. Netizens mainly focused on four aspects to question. The first is whether the identity of the host of the program is true after graduating from the School of Archaeology and Museums of Peking University, and the second is the authenticity of a netizen who claimed to be holding "cultural relics in the collection" connected in the program.
These doubts have sparked public concern and discussion. For the authenticity of the academic background of the program host and the identity of the connected guests, the program party should give a clearer explanation and proof to dispel the public's doubts. In addition, if some of the episodes in the show are based on real events, they should also be clearly stated in the program to avoid misleading the audience.
As an entertainment program that is popular with the public, the program party should pay more attention to the authenticity and public welfare of the program's content, and avoid over-exaggerating and exaggerating the facts, so as to maintain the credibility and credibility of the program. It is hoped that the program party can give a positive response and explanation to the questions of netizens, and jointly maintain a good program image and audience trust.