Sugarcane planting is one of the pillar industries of Liucheng County's agricultural economy, and it is also a "sweet cause" for the masses to increase their income and get rich. On October 11, the Liucheng County People's Court's Litigation and Mediation Center flexibly used the multiple dispute resolution mechanism, through joint mediation with the Liucheng County Market Supervision Administration and the Liucheng County Consumer Committee, and adopted the method of "multiple mediation + judicial confirmation" to successfully resolve 111 sales contract disputes caused by sugarcane farmers due to the purchase of sugarcane detoxified seedlings "wrong version", and effectively solve the people's worries.
"The wrong version" leads to the loss of subsidies
In October 2024, 111 sugare farmers including Wei in Zhailong Town, Liucheng County, reported that between March and April this year, they purchased sugarcane detoxified seedlings from an agricultural company, and the invoice voucher submitted stated that the variety was Guitang No. 44.
Image source network invasion and deletion
After receiving the goods and planting, the sugarcane farmers found that the sugarcane detoxification seedling was Guiliu No. 05136, which was inconsistent with the sugarcane detoxification seedling Guitang No. 44 stated in the invoice, and there was a problem of "wrong version", resulting in 111 sugarcane farmers losing the sugarcane detoxification seedling subsidy due to the subsidy standard not meeting the distribution conditions, totaling about 180,000 yuan. A dispute arose when the sugarcane farmer unsuccessfully claimed compensation from an agricultural company.
Multi-party linkage to resolve disputes at one time
This series of cases not only involves the vital interests of 100 sugarseed farmers, but also concerns the later cooperation between sugarcane merchants and sugarcane farmers, which is closely related to the stability of local economic development. In order to avoid intensifying the conflict and efficiently resolve the dispute, after receiving the complaint of the sugarcane farmers, the Liucheng Court Litigation and Mediation Center, together with the Liucheng County Market Supervision Administration and the Liucheng County Consumer Mediation Committee, investigated the case and organized mediation, and at the same time strengthened communication with the Zhailong government and the Sugar Industry Office.
The mediator carefully studied the materials submitted by the parties, clarified the facts, actively communicated and negotiated with the representatives of both parties, prepared a data table of compensation for detoxified seedlings of sugarcane farmers, and checked the amount owed one by one. During the mediation process, the judge explained the law and reason to the parties from many aspects, and guided both parties to empathize.
In the end, after the joint efforts of many parties, the agricultural company promised to pay the compensation in a lump sum within the agreed time and signed a mediation agreement. Subsequently, the court judicially confirmed the mediation agreement, and provided an enforceable "double insurance" for the agreed compensation, and 111 sales contract disputes were resolved at one time.
The Liucheng People's Court has taken multiple measures to continuously improve the construction of a diversified mechanism for resolving contradictions and disputes, and resolved contradictions and disputes at the initial stage. In the next step, the Liucheng Court will continue to deepen the governance at the source, strengthen the linkage between the government and the court, put the non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism in the forefront, organically combine the authority of "litigation" with the convenience of "mediation", and solve the problems of the masses with heart and affection, so as to effectively enhance the people's sense of access to justice.
The above content is the original work of the official account of the Propaganda Department of the Liucheng County Party Committee of the Communist Party of China, and the copyright belongs to the Liucheng County Financial Media Center.
Director of the Propaganda Department of the Liucheng County Party Committee of the Communist Party of China Produced by the Liucheng County Financial Media Center
Source: Liucheng Law Garden
Editor in charge: Ling Shi
Editor-in-chief on duty: Feng Yanfang
Responsible producer: Xu Ke