There is a hot topic that has aroused heated discussions among netizens: Why can't a strategist be a leader?
Let's take a look at the answers shared by netizens:
One of the important reasons why strategists are often unable to be the first is their role positioning and their own limitations.
On the stage of history, strategists usually play the role of providers of wisdom and strategists. They are like think tanks hidden behind the scenes, with their keen insight and deep thinking power, they provide advice and advice to leaders.
They are adept at analysing situations and are able to peel back the layers of complex phenomena to find out the crux of the problem. They can see the weaknesses of the enemy, grasp the subtle changes in timing, and develop the most advantageous strategy for the leader.
Their actions often take place behind the scenes, away from the public eye and all sorts of complex operational matters.
For example, in ancient warfare, strategists could formulate strategies based on factors such as the strength of the enemy, the terrain, and the morale of both sides. In the camp, they meditate on the map, analyze the various possible scenarios, and then make their own suggestions.
But it was the general who really led the soldiers to charge into battle and execute the strategy. Strategists rely more on their own wisdom and experience to think about problems, rather than need to have comprehensive leadership skills like a leader, including decision-making, execution, organization, coordination, etc.
Moreover, the way of thinking of a strategist has certain limitations. They tend to focus too much on strategy and stratagem, and may overlook some of the difficulties and details in practical operations. When strategists make recommendations, they usually carefully construct seemingly perfect plans from a theoretical and logical point of view.
However, in the actual implementation process, various unexpected situations may be encountered. For example, a strategist may come up with a very subtle political strategy that takes into account the balance of power and the distribution of interests. However, in the process of implementation, it may not be possible to proceed smoothly due to factors such as social reality and public sentiment.
The reaction of the population may be more than the strategists expected, and they may become resistant to new policies, or the situation may change because of other unexpected events.
Strategists often lack the decisiveness and courage required of a leader. When faced with complex situations, they may get caught up in overthinking and analysis, and are unable to make decisions quickly. The number one needs to step up at a critical moment, make decisive decisions, and lead everyone forward.
Strategists, on the other hand, may hesitate to weigh the pros and cons, fearing that their decisions will have undesirable consequences. They may spend a lot of time analyzing the possibilities and miss the best time to make a decision.
In short, the role positioning and limitations of strategists make it difficult for them to become the number one. They play an important supporting role in the team, providing wisdom and strategy to the leader.
But to become a leader, you also need to have more qualities and abilities, such as the courage to face challenges, decisive decision-making, strong execution, etc. They are like stars, and although they shine with wisdom in the night sky, they need more qualities and opportunities to become the sun that illuminates the earth.
Thanks for reading, welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!