laitimes

Qiu Taisan mentioned the "quasi-war state layout", and the Blue Camp criticized the political language operation of "fear of China"

Qiu Taisan, chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council of the Taiwan authorities, said three days ago that he had reached a "quasi-war state layout, and was accused of operating "fear of China," which aroused doubts from the outside world.

Lin Yufang, convener of the Chinese Kuomintang think tank, said yesterday that "quasi-war" has an extremely rigorous definition in academia, and Qiu Taisan's statement does not conform to the facts, but rather the political language is "fear of China" internally; DPP "legislator" Cai Ti also criticized that through the "air defense identification zone" strictly speaking, it should not be said that it is a "quasi-war state," and such a term is inappropriate.

Qiu Taisan mentioned the "quasi-war state layout", and the Blue Camp criticized the political language operation of "fear of China"

Another person from the Blue Camp pointed out that qiu Taisan himself cannot study law and cannot fail to understand it; "defense minister" Qiu Guozheng is even more unlikely to know what a "quasi-war" is; the key lies in the fact that at a time when the cross-strait situation is on the rise, any language used must be very precise, and not only should it not stimulate the mainland, but still less should political language be used to influence Taiwan's psychology or create an incorrect judgment of the situation.

In the face of criticism from the outside world, Qiu Taisan defended yesterday that the "quasi-war state layout" does not mean that it is a "quasi-war," and that peace and stability between the two sides of the strait and the Taiwan Strait are not only of concern to the two sides of the strait, but also a matter of concern to the international community, and "no one wants war."

On the issue of relevant issues, Ma Xiaoguang, spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, once pointed out that the root cause of the tension and turmoil in cross-strait relations is that the DPP authorities stubbornly adhere to the "Taiwan independence" stand, refuse to recognize the "1992 Consensus, which embodies the one-China principle," and constantly incite "anti-China hatred of China" sentiments on the island out of political self-interest, provoke confrontation between the two sides of the strait, and obstruct and undermine normal cross-strait exchanges. The responsibility for the development of cross-strait relations to this state lies entirely with the DPP authorities. (Xue Yang/Editor)

Read on