Taiwan Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Qiu Taisan Says Taiwan's Current "Constitution" for Reunification Is "Outdated" The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council: Continuing to Sell the "Two-State Theory"

Source: Taiwan.com

Qiu Taisan, chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council on the Taiwan side. (Picture from Taiwan media)

Taiwan's Taiwan Network reported on 30 October that Qiu Taisan, chairman of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, said on 29 October that the so-called "four adherences" previously put forward by Taiwan regional leader Tsai Ing-wen are Taiwan's so-called "mainstream public opinion and bottom line." He also said that due to the differences in the cross-strait system and the so-called "values," the two sides need to handle issues pragmatically through so-called "dialogue on an equal footing." With regard to Qiu Taisan's relevant remarks about confusing right and wrong and reversing black and white, the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council responded on the evening of 29 June, pointing out that Qiu Taisan's continued trafficking in the "two-state theory" is shirking the responsibility of the DPP authorities for plotting "independence" provocations.

Qiu Taisan: The absence of US troops "stationed in Taiwan" is the mainland's "excessive tension"

Tsai Ing-wen previously mentioned in an interview with CNN that the US military has cooperated in training in Taiwan, and the mainland has responded solemnly to many departments, while stressing "zero tolerance for Taiwan independence.", while Qiu Taisan said in an interview on the 29th that the continuous military exchanges between Taiwan and the United States are not only these 5 years, but the density and intensity of these 5 years are high, but this is only "military exchanges", there is no US military "stationing", it is the mainland 'excessive tension'.

Qiu Taisan defends Tsai Ing-wen's absurd remarks of "mutual disorganization"

In addition, when Qiu Taisan attended an event on the island on the same day, he continued to "defend" Tsai Ing-wen's absurd remarks that "the two sides of the strait are not subordinate to each other." Qiu Taisan said that the so-called "mutual non-subordination" is an indisputable "objective fact" and even more so the "status quo in the Taiwan Strait" over the past 72 years. When asked whether "reunification" is still written in Taiwan's first constitutional provisions, Qiu Taisan also argued that Taiwan's first constitutional regulations have been revised many times since 1991, and the preface of the additional articles has "met the needs before reunification.", but in the process of cross-strait development from past military confrontation to "peaceful settlement," there have been many changes in the international and cross-strait situation, and "there is no way to view 70 years from the viewpoint of 74 years ago."

Experts and netizens on the island criticized Qiu Taisan as a "loser of democracy"

Zhang Jing, a researcher at Taiwan's China Strategic Society, wrote on the 29th that Qiu Taisan made insincere suggestions on the wrong occasion, aimed at the wrong targets, expressed wrong political accusations in the wrong language, and made insincere suggestions. According to Taiwan media reports, some Taiwan netizens left messages mockingly" time on the mainland, who will pay attention to you?" "Shut yourself off, thinking people would be afraid." You know, you are committing suicide in slow motion with the whole island. This group of so-called democrats losers. ”

Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council: There are only "two insistences" on the major issues of right and wrong between the two sides of the strait

In response to Qiu Taisan's remarks on cross-strait relations, he distorted the facts and attacked and slandered the mainland. Ma Xiaoguang, spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, said on the evening of 29 June that Qiu Taisan's relevant remarks continued to sell the "two-state theory," continued to confuse right and wrong, reverse black and white, and vainly attempted to deceive the people on the island, mislead the international community, and shirk the responsibility of the DPP authorities for plotting "independence" provocations.

Ma Xiaoguang stressed: On the major issues of right and wrong in cross-strait relations, there are only "two adherences": upholding the one-China principle and the "1992 Consensus" and persisting in opposing "Taiwan independence." The so-called "four insistences" are naked adherence to the "two-state theory."; the so-called "promise remains unchanged" means that the promise to the "Taiwan independence" separatist forces has not changed, which will inevitably lead to tension and turmoil in the Taiwan Strait, will inevitably seriously damage the security interests and people's livelihood and well-being of the Taiwan compatriots, will inevitably be spurned by compatriots on both sides of the strait and all the sons and daughters of China, and will inevitably end in complete failure. (Taiwan Network Zhang Ling)