I am stone.
A post-85, he loves to interpret "Heavenly Dao" and "Heavenly Curtain Red Dust".
Daily one more, if you like, please click to pay attention.
"Heavenly Path" analysis, the first release of the whole network
If you need to reprint, please indicate the source
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" >What is the kingdom of heaven? </h1>
The kingdom of heaven is a state that cannot be attained in everyone's heart.
This explanation should be acceptable to many people.
But what is the difference between going to heaven and not going? The realm of each person's heart is different, and the kingdom of heaven seen is also different.
Saved by faith, heaven by faith.
If all that is going is a kingdom of heaven, then there should be a unified standard for the kingdom of heaven.
The last thing that needs to be renounced is their respective views and positions.
What is a narrow door?
The extremely high realm of life that does not exist because of the causal relationship between going to heaven and going to hell is the narrow gate. #天道 #
If the narrow gate is the only entrance to heaven, then all that we do now is meaningful and valuable.
In the end, all that is sought is to find a place where the heart is not bitter.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" > is the kingdom of heaven. </h1>
"If it's a paradise where camels wear needles, I admire them because I can't do it."
The kingdom of heaven that Ding Yuanying saw did not come from God's promise.
Too deep enlightenment and too complex a process of refining is a narrow door that is difficult to enter by human instinct.
The covenant between sentient beings and God is not saved simply by faith.
Rather, there are more complex cultivation processes and deeper enlightenment.
Saved by faith, sent to hell by unbelief.
This is not the criterion of salvation, but the magic of wisdom and goodness that cannot be understood by those who do not understand it.
The women of Wangmiao Village used their own standpoints to give Ding Yuanying the illusion of the kingdom of heaven.
Her view is that as long as you believe, you can be saved by faith.
Therefore, she desperately wanted to join the Latin Yuan-English religion.
In her cognitive condition, as long as you believe, you can be saved.
If this view continues to extend, to a deeper level of local understanding, a lot of knowledge and truth are used, not because you have heard it.
Ultimately, it comes back to a such observation.
<h1 class = "pgc-h-arrow-right" > gained by believers and sent to hell for unbelief. </h1>
The point still falls on this letter, what should I believe?
Knowledge and truth are useless, and only when they are used are they useful. Feedback is in the matter, which is what the so-called spiritual support is!
If the kingdom of heaven also has the attributes of beauty, ugliness, good and evil, then what is this heaven?
The kingdom of heaven does not possess the attributes of beauty, ugliness, good and evil.
What is the day? Heaven is God, God, the Creator of all things, the Almighty and Omniscient, the Omniscient... In a word, heaven is the Tao, the law of things and the law of nature.
The kingdom of heaven referred to by the women of Wangmiao Village is a place that cannot be reached. By the covenant with God, you can enter the kingdom of heaven, but you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven, and it should also be a covenant with God.
Delusion is heaven.
The culture of the Savior, only the Savior can speak.
The "paradise" that Ding Yuanying saw was heaven.
Pastor Liu asked, "Do you believe in God?" ”
Ding Yuanying replied: "Believe, is the only truth that is God?"
Break the external position of all things and point out that things are essentially God.
To be honest, doing honest things is God.
When pastors refer to "God," they refer to a certain kind of view.
And the "god" that Ding Yuanying answered is the law of things.
In the words of Ye Zinong, it is to see the road and not the way, that is, to see the realm of cause and effect.
Stripping away external factors, it is very difficult to see the essence of things.
Ding Yuanying's discussion with Pastor Liu, I don't think it's a question of who is smart and who is stupid.
It is the difference in each other's values, or the difference in the state of each other's definition of God.
The narrow gate is the highest value of Christ's moral ideal. When you pass through this narrow door, you can see God.
Wang Mingyang asked blankly, "Where is the Kingdom of Heaven?" ”
Xiao Dan said solemnly, "The kingdom of heaven is in your heart." ”
The difference in values leads to different positions, opinions, likes and dislikes.
But this does not mean that because they do not agree with each other's views, the principles held by each other are invalid.
It's just that opinions are not compatible with each other.
According to Pastor Liu's standards, Ding Yuanying's understanding of Christ is outrageous.
"What is the relationship between God and man?"
"Good value for money"
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" > many of the views of the Heavenly Dao are renunciation views. </h1>
Let the reader use another perspective to examine and discover.
Nothing to live in.
Before Xiao Dan was killed, Ding Yuanying had silently prayed in his heart, really hoping that there was a heaven that prayer would work.
The truth and knowledge of "Heavenly Dao", from different angles and positions, will have a different cognition and understanding.
As you level up your awareness, get closer and closer to the truth of truth. At the same time, it will also make you fall into an endless thinking trap.
Seeing this book is like opening another window and hearing different sounds.
The same thing, because the angle is different, the conclusion is not the same.
Why did Ye Feng Liu and Xiao Yawen, faced with the same facts, make diametrically opposed judgments?
With a Ding Yuanying, can Wang Miao Village really be saved?
……
Questions that have already been turned over, when re-examined, will see different results.
The difference in cognitive level comes from here.
"God is the Word, the Tao is natural, as it comes"
He who acts according to the law is God and the way.
But where is our way?