By chance, I saw the news of China Youth Daily on March 3, and the China Academy of Education and Social Development of Beijing Normal University released the "National "Double Reduction" Effectiveness Survey Report", 83.5% of the surveyed students did not participate in off-campus discipline training, and 63.3% of the surveyed students did not participate in non-disciplinary training. The report also interviewed parents, but it is clear that the data is not encouraging, with only 31.5% of parents of students believing that the number of students participating in subject-based training courses is decreasing.
The report also surveyed the extent to which the volume of homework had been reduced and satisfaction with after-school services, both of which were relatively high. 75.3% of the students felt the reduction in the amount of homework, and 89.0% of the students surveyed were satisfied with the after-school service.
More humorously, the Report points out that parents have higher expectations for education. 91.2% of the parents surveyed hope that their children will have a bachelor's degree or above in the future. What parent doesn't want their child to read more? I think 100% of parents expect their children to go to college is not too high an expectation of education.
It seems to be very good results, but it can be seen from the students' mouths that according to the proportion of random inspections in the Report, 86 of the 100 students do not participate in off-campus tutoring. But there are still 15 students who are tutoring in off-campus subjects. We need to take into account that not all students have access to off-campus tutoring, such as students in remote areas, mountainous areas, and poor areas do not have the opportunity, so this proportion will become smaller if it is only implemented in cities.
Even without considering this, we have to look at other aspects. The "double subtraction" actually prohibits off-campus tutoring during the holidays, so why is 14% of students able to access this service? This is an even worse thing for the 86% of students who honestly don't accept tutoring. Is it true that you can't find it, or do you not want to check it and can't check it?
In fact, as a parent, I will not be too happy to see this report, I am afraid that the vast majority of parents will see this side of what I see, the same students compete in the school, originally hoped to flatten things, but after the investigation found that there is still a large proportion of students in the additional improvement, the future of their children in disguise caused by the non-G.
Whether it is the middle school entrance examination or the college entrance examination, it is a selection test, and no parent is willing to see their children being diverted and fallen off the list. The "double subtraction" aims to let students who are more suitable for learning continue to learn, but after this "report" comes out, will it make parents feel more anxious?
If 99% of children said they did not participate in extracurricular discipline training, only 1% of children did. The ratio of 100 to 1 is acceptable to everyone, but on the basis of the fact that poor areas are not eligible to participate in off-campus discipline training, there is still a ratio of 100 to 16, which is not small. You should know that the current entrance examination advocates a 5-to-5 split, and everyone can calculate it by themselves.
According to reports, this report involves 31 provinces and cities, 213 districts and counties, 3564 schools, with a total effective sample total of 1.689 million, and the data should be more real. It just seems that the future "double subtraction" task is still quite arduous.
Image source network, intrusion and deletion. Read educational anecdotes with you, share educational concepts, and understand subject knowledge
We look forward to your attention, sharing and comments