In order to more intuitively show the performance of different models in terms of "new car commerciality", on the basis of "new car commercial evaluation", the car quality network more intuitively shows the advantages and disadvantages of different models in terms of new car commerciality through the comparison of various sub-data, and objectively evaluates the data differences to provide consumers with more valuable car purchase suggestions.
Thanks to the large body size, medium and large SUVs occupy a unique advantage in terms of seating space, and the flexible seat layout form also fully meets the needs of different consumer groups, so it is increasingly favored by home users. This issue of the Mercantile Horizontal Selection selects four medium and large SUVs with high attention in the market, including mainstream joint venture brand models and self-owned brand models. Among them, although Lanjing and Tuon are also from the Volkswagen MQB EVO platform, there are obvious differences in styling design and space layout. Lingyu is one of the few models in the same class that offers 5-seater, 6-seater and 7-seat layouts at the same time to meet the needs of multi-family cars. As an independent brand model, the Pentium T99 shows full sincerity in terms of price and configuration, while adopting a mainstream 5-seat layout to create a spacious interior space. How do the four models perform in terms of new car commerciality? Below we will compare the data of each sub-test to explain it in detail for you.
1. Body craft
In the body process, from the test results, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon has obvious advantages, and the results of three test points in the five key test points are ahead of the other three models, and the overall gap uniformity is excellent, and the average difference between the maximum and minimum gap data of the whole car is only 0.5mm. Faw-Volkswagen's test results in most parts of the territory are almost the same as those of Tu Ang, but the test results are relatively backward in the "two sides of the rear fenders and trunk covers". Jiangling Ford Lingyu only achieved outstanding results at the "front fenders and bonnets on both sides" test point, and the rest of the parts performed decently. Faw allurn T99 led the gap value due to the one-piece design of the engine hatch, and led the results at the two test points of "front doors and front fenders on both sides" and "rear fenders and trunk covers on both sides", and the overall performance was in line with expectations.
In a comprehensive comparison, in a test of body technology, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon performed well as a whole, not only the gap values of each part were at a low level, but the uniformity of the gap was also satisfactory. In addition to the FAW-Volkswagen landscape lagging behind in the "two sides of the rear fenders and trunk cover" test point, the rest of the performance is also remarkable. Although Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 have outstanding test results in individual parts, there is still room for improvement in the overall body process level.
2. Paint film level
In the paint film level, from the test results, the average value of the paint film of the four models exceeded the standard value of the high-end car (120μm -150μm), and the overall performance was excellent.
From the test results of the seven major parts, it can be seen that the average thickness of the paint film of the FAW Besturn T99 has reached 228.3μm, and the test results of the six parts are far ahead of the other three models. Faw-Volkswagen's coating thickness performance is second only to that of the Besturn T99, and the thickness of the paint film in most parts of the vehicle remains above 170μm, but due to the large gap between the average thickness of the paint film at the trunk cover and other parts of the body, it reflects that there is still room for improvement in spray uniformity. Although the thickness of the paint film of the whole vehicle is decent, the difference in the thickness of the paint film of each part of the two models is small, and the spray uniformity is excellent.
In a comprehensive comparison, in the paint film level test, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon and Jiangling Ford Lingyu performed well in spray uniformity, and the paint film thickness also reached the leading level of the same level. Although the overall thickness of the paint film of FAW-Volkswagen and faw Besturn T99 is very impressive, the average thickness of the paint film of each part is quite different, and the spray uniformity is slightly inferior.
3. Air quality in the car
In the interior air quality test, no formaldehyde component was detected in the car of the four models. At the same time, the content of inhalable particulate matter such as PM2.5 in the car is also relatively low, in line with the relevant standards in the "Guidelines for Air Quality Evaluation in Passenger Vehicles" (National Standard GB/T 27630-2011) jointly issued by the former Ministry of Environmental Protection and the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China since March 1, 2012.
4. Noise in the car
In the vehicle noise test, in addition to testing the noise of the engine into the car at rest, idle speed, 2000 rpm and 3000 rpm, the test instrument will also be placed at a position of about 10cm from the air conditioner outlet, and then the air conditioning air volume will be raised from small to large, and the air conditioning noise value of the driver position in different gears will be measured.
After actual measurement, in the static state, Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 performed better, reaching the minimum value of the test instrument 30dB. With the increase of speed, the noise value of all four models has gradually increased, of which the most obvious trend is fawC Besturn T99, which has reached 53.6dB when the engine is at 3000 rpm. FAW-Volkswagen was affected by the ambient noise of the test, resulting in a high overall noise value, and the performance of saic-Volkswagen Tuon and Jiangling Ford Lingyu was relatively close, but it was SAIC Volkswagen Tuon that was better in comparison.
In terms of the lowest noise of air conditioners, FAW-Volkswagen and SAIC Volkswagen Tuang perform relatively better, and daily use has almost no impact on the occupants of the car. In contrast, the FAW Besturn T99's air conditioner has high starting gear noise. In terms of the highest-end noise of air conditioning, the noise value measured by SAIC Volkswagen Tuon is only 64.7dB, which is significantly lower than that of the same level of models, while the faw-Volkswagen Lanjing, Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 models are still within the range that the human body can tolerate although the measured noise value is high.
5. Static vibration in the car
After actual measurement, the value measured by the steering wheel of FAW-Volkswagen Lanjing and SAIC Volkswagen Tuang in the idle state is 0, which is among the best in the same level of models tested, and the vibration values of the remaining test points in the two states are also low, and the body feeling is not obvious. In contrast, the overall performance of the two models of Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 is not satisfactory, and the values of each test point in the two states of idle speed and load are somewhat high, especially the test value of the FAW Besturn T99 steering wheel at idle speed is significantly higher than that of the other three models.
6. Tire hub
In the tire hub test, the tire width, flat ratio and size are mainly evaluated. The tires of the four models are relatively close in size, and all use large tires of 20 or 21 inches. In terms of width and flat ratio, FAW-Volkswagen and SAIC Volkswagen Tuon tire widths are relatively large. The FAW Besturn T99 flat ratio is higher, reaching 50%. The Jiangling Ford Collar is moderate in width and flat ratio, and it can be used well for daily use to balance handling and comfort.
7. Sunroof
In tests against the sunroof, all four models were equipped with a openable panoramic sunroof, although the opening area was different. Among them, the SAIC Volkswagen Tuang sunroof opening area is the largest, reaching 0.5m2, FAW-Volkswagen And FAW Besturn T99 open area is the same 0.35m2, and the rear permeability is not as good as the front row. In terms of lighting area, although the length of the sunroof of FAW-Volkswagen has reached 1220mm, the width is relatively narrow, and in terms of comprehensive comparison, it is still the panoramic sunroof of Jiangling Ford Lingyu that has a larger lighting area.
8. Control system
In terms of handling, the FAW-Volkswagen Turbo and SAIC Volkswagen Tuon steering wheels are moderately sized, and the SAIC Volkswagen Tuon steering wheel has a larger adjustable angle up and down, making it easier to drive. In contrast, the steering wheels of Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 are significantly larger, and the ease of operation is general when parking at low speeds.
In terms of the height difference and spacing of the throttle and brake pedals that affect the driving experience, the performance of the three models of SAIC Volkswagen Tuon, Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 is relatively close, and the step difference and spacing are within a reasonable range. In contrast, the FAW-Volkswagen range is slightly larger, but still within a reasonable range, so that the design can prevent the phenomenon of mixing the throttle and the brake, and at the same time, when driving in congested road conditions, the frequent alternating pedaling of the foot will not make the driver feel tired.
9. Seat
In terms of seat configuration, according to the measured data, saic motor Volkswagen Tuon's main driver's seat has a large range of travel adjustment, which can meet the driving habits of most drivers.
In terms of seat cushion length, FAW Besturn T99 performed better overall, and the length of the front and rear seat cushions was very impressive. FAW-Volkswagen And Jiangling Ford Lingyu front seat cushion length is good, but the third row of seat cushions is slightly shorter, and the rear seat is not as comfortable as the front. In contrast, the seat cushions of the front and rear seats of SAIC Volkswagen Tuon are relatively short, and the leg support area is slightly insufficient.
In terms of rear seat back angle, FAW-Volkswagen Lanjing, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon and Jiangling Ford Lingyu rear seat back angle all support manual adjustment, of which Jiangling Ford Lingyu has a large adjustment range to meet the comfort of passengers of different sizes. Faw Allurn T99 Although the rear seat backrest does not support adjustment, due to the moderate angle, it will not cause fatigue during a long ride.
In terms of the height and width of the rear floor bulge, the raised height of the FAW-Volkswagen and FAW Besturn T99 rear floors is not obvious, and the FAW-Volkswagen hub is larger, which basically does not affect the comfort of the passengers in the middle of the rear. In contrast, the SAIC Volkswagen Tuon rear floor is raised higher, but because the bulge width is also larger, the sitting position of the passenger in the middle of the rear row is not too uncomfortable.
10. Trunk
In terms of trunk, from the measured data, FAW-Volkswagen And SAIC Volkswagen Tuang are obviously superior in vertical height, and the internal longitudinal space is large, but due to the large ground height after the tailgate is opened, daily use is slightly inconvenient. The maximum width and minimum width of Jiangling Ford Lingyu are not much different, the internal shape is relatively regular, and the height of the ground after the tailgate is opened is small, and the practicality is outstanding. Although the FAW Besturn T99 is decent in its test data, there is no problem in meeting daily use.
11. Parking radar
In the radar induction test, according to the existing test data, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon reversing radar detection ability is strong, the longest detection distance can reach 155cm, the radar power performance is good, and each beep is very clear. Referring to the previous test experience, the closer to 25cm in the continuous beeping stage, the closer it is to daily use habits. Judging from the measured data, the continuous beep prompt distance of the reversing radar of SAIC Volkswagen Tuang and Jiangling Ford Lingyu is just 25cm, which is consistent with the test experience value, while the nearest prompt distance of FAW-Volkswagen Lanjing and FAW Besturn T99 is 28cm and 30cm respectively, which is not much different from the experience value.
In terms of front radar, FAW-Volkswagen, SAIC Volkswagen Tuang and Jiangling Ford Lingyu have close detection capabilities, with the farthest detection distance exceeding 100cm, while faw Besturn T99 performed slightly worse in this test session. The continuous beep stage prompts that the distance is 30cm for all four models, which is slightly different from the experience points.
12. Lighting field
In the blind spot test session directly in front of the field of view, we used the 70 cm high pile bucket as a reference object, and then adjusted the relative position of the vehicle until the upper edge of the pile bucket could be seen in the main driver's seat. According to the existing test data, the three models of SAIC Volkswagen Tuon, Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 have a better forward vision than the average level of the same class, while the FAW-Volkswagen overview does not reach the average level of the same level. In terms of rear vision blind spots, the four models have reached the average level of the same level, of which FAW Besturn T99 test results are obviously superior, relatively speaking, FAW-Volkswagen Lanjing and Jiangling Ford Lingyu performance is slightly worse.
In the field of view test of the exterior mirrors, the left exterior mirrors of faw-Volkswagen, SAIC Volkswagen Tuon and Jiangling Ford Lingyu were better than the average of the same class of models tested, among which the FAW-Volkswagen boundary test score reached 30°, ranking higher. In terms of right-hand vision, the test results of Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 were 25.2° and 25° respectively, which were at the leading level of the same level. It is worth mentioning that due to the large blind spot of the left outer rearview mirror of FAW Besturn T99, it has a certain impact on the test results.
summary
Through the comparison of the above items, it is not difficult to find that the four medium and large SUVs selected this time with high attention have reached the level of the same level of models in terms of commerciality. The four models competed against each other in the test, with FAW-Volkswagen in terms of body craftsmanship, paint film thickness, vibration suppression and exterior mirror visibility, but lacking in the sunroof opening area and the blind spot of the front vision. In addition to continuing the advantages of FAW-Volkswagen, SAIC Volkswagen Tuang also made up for the shortcomings of the reversing radar and the blind spot of the front vision, but it was slightly lacking in the length of the seat cushion. The overall performance of Jiangling Ford Lingyu and FAW Besturn T99 is close, Jiangling Ford Lingyu has obvious advantages in paint film spray uniformity, sunroof lighting area and trunk practicality, while FAW Besturn T99 has eye-catching performance in terms of paint film thickness, seat cushion length and rear vision. On the whole, the difference in the commercial test results of the four models is not large, and consumers can choose according to their own needs.