If you think it's good, just click "Follow".
Copywriting丨Entertainment No. 8 Weekly Diary
Editor丨Entertainment No. 8 Weekly Diary
The travel column of Phoenix.com posted a video of Jiang Ping's neighbor interview.
Her neighbors described her as a good learner, filial and caring.
Because of her poor family, Jiang Ping chose a technical secondary school after the high school entrance examination, and many people resonated with it.
There is a difference in educational resources between urban and rural areas, and Jiang Ping's competition results cannot be questioned just because she is a secondary school student, and she has won the twelfth place in the world by virtue of her talent and hard work.
Some people questioned her cheating, but in fact she came prepared for the competition.
There are two dog barks at the end of the video.
This video is intriguing.
As public opinion controversy intensifies, valuable information is drowned out in a flood of discussion and speculation.
Not only does this drain social sentiment, but it also makes it difficult for real facts to surface.
Jiang Ping, as a party, has endured huge pressure from public opinion, which has undoubtedly caused great trouble to her life and study.
It is necessary for schools, competition parties and other relevant parties to respond to the public's doubts in a timely manner, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and at the same time clarify the truth.
Only in this way can we avoid further escalation of the storm of public opinion, and only then can the public have a fair evaluation of the competition and the participants.
In the midst of public opinion controversy, the travel column of Phoenix.com released a video of an interview with Jiang Ping's neighbors.
Through the description of the neighbor's uncle and aunt, this video shows Jiang Ping's advantages such as good learning, filial piety, and love.
She also told about her experience of choosing a secondary school to study tailoring due to her family's financial difficulties.
This video has aroused widespread public attention and discussion, and has also made more people pay attention to Jiang Ping's real situation.
Some netizens shared their similar experiences in the comment area, expressing their sympathy and support for Jiang Ping.
Some people have also begun to reflect on the disparity between urban and rural education resources, and the impact of this disparity on rural children.
These discussions not only drew more attention to Jiang Ping's personal experience, but also made people think about how to improve the lack of educational resources in rural areas.
There are also those who see the video as a response and attack on the questioners.
They believe that the two barks at the end of the video are a metaphor for the skeptics to blindly follow the trend, which undoubtedly exacerbates the confrontation and conflict of public opinion.
As a global public welfare competition, Ali Mathematics Competition aims to promote the popularization of mathematics science and cutting-edge exploration.
In this competition, a contestant named Jiang Ping caused a huge controversy.
Jiang Ping was recognized by the competition for her excellent performance, but she was also questioned by all parties.
The doubts mainly focused on her secondary school education, the authenticity of the competition results, and whether there was cheating.
In this controversy, reasonable questioning is necessary, but excessive speculation and denigration are irresponsible.
Due to the professionalism of mathematics and the lack of evidence, many onlookers may distort the discussion and even mislead the public.
In this case, the public should exercise restraint and wait for a response from the relevant authorities and the competition party.
In this controversy, the confrontation between the pro-supporters and the skeptics is particularly intense.
The pro-support faction emphasized that heroes do not ask where they come from, and refuted discrimination against Jiang Ping's background.
They believe that Jiang Ping's participation in the competition is capable, strong and prepared, and her competition results cannot be questioned just because of her secondary school education.
There are also people who come forward to say that mathematical geniuses do not necessarily deserve high scores on the test, and that everyone's talent and hard work should be respected.
The skeptics turned up the record of Jiang Ping's secondary school exam scores and questioned whether the change in his grades was real.
They also questioned Jiang Ping's mistakes in the board book in the game and whether there was a possibility of cheating in the opening book of the game.
There are also doubts that this is a commercial hype, driven by profits.
In this confrontation, the views of both sides have their reasonableness, but there is also a certain one-sidedness.
In this case, we should maintain an objective and rational attitude, and not blindly follow the trend or blindly reject doubts.
Only through adequate investigation and discussion can the real answer be found.
The story of Ali Shusai and Jiang Ping allows us to see the power and impact of the storm of public opinion.
In this era of information explosion, we should not only focus on the development of the incident itself, but also reflect on how to avoid similar situations from happening again.
We should respect everyone's talents and efforts, and not discriminate against others because of their background or academic qualifications.
We must also maintain an objective and rational attitude, and do not blindly follow the trend or blindly reject doubts.
Only through adequate investigation and discussion can the real answer be found.
Relevant departments and competition parties should strengthen the standardization and authority of the competition to ensure the fairness and fairness of the competition.
It is also necessary to respond to the public's questions and concerns in a timely manner, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and avoid further escalation of public opinion storms.
We should also pay attention to the disparity in educational resources between urban and rural areas.
It is not uncommon for rural children to be forced to abandon their studies because of their families' financial difficulties.
We should strive to improve the problem of insufficient educational resources in rural areas, so that more children can enjoy high-quality educational resources.
The story of Ali Shusai and Jiang Ping allows us to see the power and impact of the storm of public opinion.
We should draw lessons and enlightenment from this and maintain an objective and rational attitude in the face of similar incidents and controversies.
Only in this way can we jointly safeguard a just, fair, and harmonious public opinion environment.
Each of us is a participant in the quest for truth.
We need to be vigilant against the distortion of facts by traffic and saliva, and we must have the courage to reveal and defend the truth.
We must also learn to maintain independent thinking in the storm of public opinion, not blindly follow or be biased, and treat other people's views with a rational and tolerant attitude.
More importantly, we need to pay attention to the deep-seated issues behind the incident, such as the inequality of educational resources and the tolerance of society to diverse backgrounds.
Through reflection and action, we can drive progress and change in society so that everyone can enjoy justice and equitable opportunities.
In this controversy between Ali and Jiang Ping, we see the complexity and diversity of society.
However, as long as we maintain a rational and tolerant attitude and adhere to the principles of truth and justice, we can jointly create a better public opinion and social environment.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.