If it is not reported, it is a high-quality product, a low-cost hard product, isn't it what Chinese brands are best at?

Wen Lidao

2024-07-01 11:53Creator in the automotive field

This year's rim price war was pushed to a climax by the Qin L and Seal 06 that were launched in the middle of the year. The starting price of 99,800 yuan was called "industrial father" and "industrial father" by netizens. Some powerful friends have also "played cards" to follow up, and those who are not able to follow are unwilling to say "can't afford it" according to the rules of the table, but turn up the silver, yin and yang weird. What is said that under the low price, there are no hard goods.

Qin L and Seal 06 sell for 99,800 yuan, it must be a low price, yes, but is it a hard product? Did BYD cut corners? Recently, an automotive media did the dismantling and analysis of BYD Qin L and Geely Galaxy L6, and the results were shocking.

Let's talk about the conclusion first: the program carried out a detailed dismantling of "Qin L and Galaxy L6", and carried out a horizontal comparison of Qin L and Galaxy L6 from 3 major items "safety design", "materials" and "powertrain" and 13 small items: Qin L was superior in 8 items such as front impact beam, passenger compartment, chassis, fuel tank, engine, gearbox, electronic control, and soft decoration in the car. The Galaxy L6 has an advantage in three items: rear impact beam, front suspension, and rear suspension. In addition, there are two items of equal quality, namely: anti-rust process and the proportion of ultra-high-strength steel materials.

In fact, there is not much need for such a comparison of baht, and from the results of the dismantling, there are no losers in the two brands. For example, the front anti-collision beam, Qin L has a larger coverage area than Galaxy L6, which does not mean that L6 is not good. As mentioned in the program, the Galaxy L6 three-level DHT structure is more complex and may have a higher failure rate. However, the three-speed structure also has its advantages, for example, it can allow the engine to participate in the vehicle drive in a wider range of speeds, and the vehicle dynamic performance will be better.

Another example is in the engine disassembly part, Qin L's engine is indeed more thermally efficient, and there is no particle trap, but the Galaxy L6 uses a turbocharged engine, which has higher power and will have more advantages in areas with thin air such as plateaus.

A score of 99 is higher than a score of 98, but it does not mean that a score of 98 is not excellent. Many times it's just a matter of choosing between different options. Galaxy L6 is not as hot as Qin L, if this car becomes the best-selling model, I am afraid that the attack on its particle trap will follow. It is certainly not objective to grasp a point and criticize a model, a brand. There is no end to the car, and all models have their own advantages and shortcomings. Turning a blind eye to the advantages, grasping the shortcomings, and even forcibly deducting the hat can only be understood as despicable business methods.

Take Qin L's rear anti-collision beam as an example, this point has been specially named by a certain brand, and there is indeed no energy-absorbing box. But is this cutting corners? Why is Qin L's front anti-collision beam so kind, and he doesn't even give an energy-absorbing box on the rear anti-collision beam? If you don't have enough brains, you just follow the rhythm of those sunspots, but let's think about it independently, when a vehicle collides, is it a head-on collision or a rear-end collision? Does the vehicle have more parts to protect at the front or more parts to protect at the rear?

A front-of-car collision may be a collision with a hard object, a vehicle collision, or a rear-end collision. In the first two cases, the speed difference is large, the collision energy is high, and the front of the car has many valuable parts, so a higher level of protection is required. And the collision at the rear of the car, in addition to the scratches when reversing, is a rear-end collision. How fast can we be when reversing? Can the speed be compared to normal driving? Moreover, when the two cars are rear-ended, the speed is subtracted, even if it is rear-ended in a stationary state, the vehicle will move forward to reduce the collision energy. Coupled with the fact that there are no too valuable parts at the rear, the level of protection required is much lower than at the front end.

Is it possible that this design was chosen after much discussion, research, and evaluation? Isn't it the conscience of car companies to save costs where they are not needed, and at the same time to feed back the reduced costs to consumers in the form of prices? Qin L's dismantling this time proves that low price does not equal low quality. On the other hand, under the same quality, the price is high, either the cost control ability is not good, or the heart is black. Some car companies don't even have the qualifications to sell on the table, but their profits are very high, what does it mean? Or the rhetoric of low price and low quality is just an excuse to sell at a high price.

In today's auto market, a leading company like BYD has countless pairs of eyes staring at it! It's like the car company that said that if someone makes a lot of money, they will flip the table - it hasn't lifted the table now, does it mean that BYD's cars are of good quality? So-and-so is carefully selected and more trustworthy than any advertisement.

The article is nearing the end of the article, but there is a digression that is really unpleasant. Japanese fraud for so many years, the million-level Alpha doesn't even have a rear anti-collision beam, how many times have I bowed and apologized, and I don't see the arrogant car company flipping the table; The German engine has burned oil for so many years, and the Passat A-pillar is what it looks like, it is a dry dual-clutch and a particle trap, and I don't see it flipping the table. Why is the domestic brand up, it wants to flip the table?

In fact, isn't low price and high quality what we do best? Isn't Made in China synonymous with low price and high quality? How many high-priced advanced technology products from abroad have been dried by us to the price of cabbage in China? Facts have proved that under the low price, there are hard goods! Qin L's dismantling shows the material of conscience, in the industry, the voice of self-effemination and self-denigration should really reflect on it.

View original image 221K

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

•