From paying attention to the real-name report of the female doctor of the National People's Congress, to the school to report and deal with it, it took less than 24 hours to verify and make relevant treatments, and the tutor Wang Moumou was dealt with very thoroughly, and the clues to the problem will be handed over to the relevant authorities, waiting for Wang Moumou and legal accountability. I have to say that the school's quick investigation demonstrates the school's zero tolerance for teachers' moral misconduct.
Wang, a female doctoral student of the National People's Congress, reported the supervisor Wang Moumou with her real name at station B for suspected "forcible indecency", and when she failed to ask to be both a "father and daughter" and a "husband and wife", the tutor made all kinds of difficulties for more than two years, threatening the female doctor to obey if she could not graduate. The female doctor couldn't bear it, there was no way to retreat, and in the case of working 18 hours a day to prepare the paper, she sorted out the report materials and sent a video to report it with her real name at station B.
The handling of tutor Wang Moumou shows the school's determination to have zero tolerance for teachers' moral misconduct. Netizens left messages on the official Weibo of the National People's Congress, hoping to meet the wishes of the female doctor and change the supervisor so that she could graduate on time.
In addition to being happy, it is regrettable that the follow-up arrangements of the female doctoral student Wang were not revealed.
The moral anomie of college tutors has been repeatedly seen on the Internet, and colleges and universities have either concealed it, or quickly investigated and dealt with it, and reported a lot, and the report mentioned "zero tolerance for the anomie of teachers", which has made netizens numb, and people can't help but ask, why "zero tolerance" still can't prevent similar incidents from happening again?
Some netizens commented that as long as the college tutor has the power to kill and seize the power of life and death on whether the graduate student can graduate on time, no amount of zero tolerance will only cure the symptoms and not the root cause.
From the institutional perspective, the rights and interests between supervisors and graduate students are guaranteed by relevant systems. For example, the Ministry of Education pointed out in the "Several Opinions on Strengthening the Management of Doctoral Supervisors" that when there is a conflict between teachers and students or other circumstances that are not conducive to maintaining a good mentoring relationship, the training unit should mediate in a timely manner in line with the principle of protecting the rights and interests of both teachers and students, and if necessary, the mentoring relationship can be terminated and the supervisor can be redetermined.
From an operational point of view, supervisors often have a great say in whether graduate students can graduate on time.
First, the supervisor has a central position in the academic guidance of graduate students. The supervisor is the main supervisor of the student's academic research, and the supervisor will evaluate whether the student has met the scientific research ability standard in the graduation requirements according to the progress of the project and the student's performance.
The second is the key role of the supervisor in the review of graduate students' dissertations. For example, Professor Wang of the National People's University is using the provision of useful information to try to coerce female doctoral students to comply, and the media reports that Professor Wang is also the subject leader of the discipline, and there is a high probability that he will participate in the thesis review, and his academic status is easy to determine whether a female doctor can graduate on time.
Educator Conclusion
The reason why there are often similar negative news between supervisors and graduate students in colleges and universities is essentially because supervisors have a central position in graduate student guidance and play a key role in thesis evaluation, which leads to the fact that at the operational level, supervisors have a say in whether graduate students can graduate on time.
In order to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents, universities need to repair the existing tutor-led graduate student system. The first is to strengthen the guidance responsibility of tutors, stipulating that tutors must ensure the quality of guidance, and a certain proportion of graduate students cannot graduate on time, and the responsibilities of tutors should be checked or the tutor's qualifications should be cancelled.
Second, all graduate theses are sent for blind review, and the supervisor of the graduate student himself is not allowed to participate.
The third is to evaluate the scientific research ability of graduate students, and introduce an evaluation team composed of multiple teachers, rather than only one supervisor, so as to avoid the excessive power of a single supervisor.
The best way is for the supervisor to lead the graduate students, and stipulate their respective responsibilities and accountability mechanisms to avoid the supervisor from abusing his power.
In short, the unspoken rule of the tutor is that the tutor has too much power in essence, which leads to the teacher's moral anomie, and the solution is to establish a system of decentralized tutor power to avoid the tutor abusing power.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss.
(The source of the picture is the network, the picture and text are not related, and the invasion is deleted)