Have you seen "In the Name of the People"? The drama of Gao Yuliang single-handedly fighting against corruption forces makes people's blood boil. In real life, a similar drama is being played!
Recently, Suzhou Industrial Park staged a "bloody drama" of "Tsinghua Male vs. Corrupt Director", which is more energetic than a TV series! A small section member in the district dares to argue with his own director, what kind of backbone is this?
How rampant is the bureau chief's play of power and the use of his power to enrich his own pockets? The two fought wits and courage,-for-tat, which can be called "the name of the people of Suzhou"! How does this show end? Let's move on.
Here's how it happened.
There is a clerk named Ma Moumou in the Suzhou Industrial Park Bureau of Commerce, who is a high-achieving student who graduated from Tsinghua University. This young man is not a vegetarian, he can't tolerate a little sand in his eyes, and he can't get used to the crooked ways of the leaders.
So, he resisted and reported with his real name that Director Zhu had serious violations of discipline and law. For a time, Suzhou City was like being thrown into a bombshell, a sensation!
Let's take stock of how many "great achievements" this director Zhu has.
According to Ma's report, Zhu Moumou acted recklessly in government procurement and played the trick of "fancy bid-rigging". also fabricated projects, made false claims, and treated the country's money as his own Tang monk meat, and ate it as much as he wanted. What's even more surprising is that this product is actually suspected of academic fraud! If this basket problem had been placed in ancient times, I am afraid that it would have been beheaded ten times.
In the face of such a corrupt official who "acted as a prestige", Ma Moumou did not flinch, but bravely stood up and reported to the relevant departments. This kind of righteousness of righteousness and courage, hoeing the strong and helping the weak, is really admirable!
On the other hand, Director Zhu is insatiable, deceitful, and puts the interests of the country behind, which is simply a heinous crime! The contest between the two can be called a duel between good and evil.
As soon as the news came out, Suzhou City immediately took action and set up an investigation team spanning discipline inspection and supervision, organization, finance, auditing, public security, and other departments.
The investigation team is like a sophisticated "anti-corruption machine" trying to get to the bottom of the matter. On August 2, the investigation team announced the results of the investigation, which undoubtedly released a bombshell in the fight against corruption!
It turns out that Director Zhu is not in vain, he is really a bit of a real talent.
After verification, his academic certificate is genuine and belongs to a genuine master's degree. However, this does not hide his problems in other areas. From 2021 to 2023, the Suzhou Industrial Park Bureau of Commerce has frequently appeared in project procurement, including internal suppliers, bid-rigging and collusion, as well as providing false materials and deceiving inspections. A series of corrupt acts make people shudder! In this regard, I wish the director the blame!
The investigation results also showed that no obvious problems were found in other problems reported by Ma Moumou, such as annual assessment and talent introduction. This seems to have poured cold water on the whole affair. But is that really the case? Is the official conclusion biased? This makes one suspicious.
Take the incident of Ma Moumou being hit by a car as an example, the official said that the perpetrator and Zhu Moumou were "not directly or indirectly related", which is a bit ambiguous, and it is inevitable that people feel that they are deliberately avoiding it. Is it really just a coincidence that a whistleblower was suddenly involved in a car accident after making a report?
When Ma Moumou was questioned by the police station, the official explanation was that he was suspected of smearing the propaganda board. But is it unfair to treat the whistleblower as the number one suspect based on a vague guess? This is more like a disguised suppression of whistleblowers by public power.
All kinds of doubts cannot help but make people question the objectivity and impartiality of the investigation.
Judging from the whole incident, we must certainly praise Ma Moumou's courage, but at the same time, we must face up to the various problems existing in the anti-corruption work.
On the one hand, individual leaders have used the power in their hands to enrich their own pockets and act recklessly, ruining the image of the party and the government among the people. On the other hand, it is also worth pondering whether the anti-corruption agencies have truly sought truth from facts and enforced the law impartially when investigating and handling corruption cases.
The fight against corruption is a self-revolution that requires not only the courage to stand up to the sky, but also the determination to show no favoritism. Only by showing the sword with a zero-tolerance attitude can we win the trust and support of the people.
If a cadre loses his feelings for the people and deviates from the interests of the people, he has undoubtedly become a "black sheep" and must be resolutely investigated and dealt with! At the same time, anti-corruption work must be based on facts and the rule of law as the criterion, and must not be differentiated from person to person and affect justice. Only in this way will we be able to continuously win new victories in the anti-corruption struggle and establish a good image of the party and the government as being honest and honest!
So in the end, I would like to ask: when individual leaders have become corrupt elements and are not worthy of serving the people, can they still be expected to restrain themselves? When dealing with corrupt elements, how can anti-corruption agencies truly enforce orders and prohibit them without favoritism? What do you think about this?