In other words, United Kingdom has been studying abroad for so many years, and has always been the strongest study abroad camp after United States study abroad? There were even a few years when the number of children who went to United Kingdom in China once caught up with United States. But not now? The dividends are basically only around the top 100 schools, and the bottom 100 of QS now have financial problems, and there is a huge gap in student recruitment.
In contrast, in Australia, the eight universities are basically occupied by Chinese students planting flags, and non-eight students are being occupied by India students. The students who used to flow to the United Kingdom gradually changed their goals and defected to Tuao.
In fact, I analyzed the following reasons:
No.1 United Kingdom is too rolly, there are too many roll kings, and resources are consumed!
In fact, the core of studying abroad is poor information, that is, my school and grades are average, but I have the opportunity to go to a better school for a bachelor's or master's degree. Please re-establish the domestic track.
But in recent years, everyone has been involved in the United Kingdom, resulting in the United Kingdom's application for prestigious schools This part of the dividend has gradually been vacuumed. The top student can't please here, and he has to keep giving up his major to keep his position in a good school.
The essence of the roll is actually a short-term excess return in a local area, and good schools in the United Kingdom are like this, many good schools like the University of Manchester, UCL, Warwick, and KCL, which are very good at the beginning, and many of them are missing majors, so they attract a lot of outsiders to chase frantically. Especially those students who originally went to HK or the United States and Canada, they frantically poured in. Snatched away all these dividends.
Dividends are constantly being consumed or even disappearing, which means that many international students, especially those with average or lower grades, have negative returns. Waste half a day, can't apply for a good school, and even QS top 100 can't squeeze in, originally a lot of people who study a master's degree, just come to brush up on a good school, toss for a long time and nothing, QS100 and don't want to go, there is no bonus when you return to China.
Good resources are swept away in a short period of time by those who can be rolled. Therefore, studying in the United Kingdom, stay away from those roll kings, they will quickly snatch your opportunities and resources.
No.2 Why has Australia not been popular for so many years, and now it is being hyped?
Because studying in Australia, in the short term, is profitable, although in the long run, everyone still loses, and it took 2 years to study, and the recognition is not as good as United Kingdom school. Which one do you want to choose, Sydney or the University of Manchester? Basically, they all choose the University of Manchester. It's just that the University of Manchester is now swept away, and water majors such as disaster management have all been rolled up to 2.1 requirements, and a bunch of English students are going to enroll, which is outrageous.
On the other hand, in Sydney, UNSW, and even Melbourne, many students can easily apply and get an offer. IELTS requirements are not high, many majors basic upper limit is 7 not low 6, most of them only 6.5 is not low 6.Unlike the United Kingdom, slightly better schools are basically 7 not low 6, such as the University of Manchester, writing also 6.5, like KCL London schools, basically 7 not low 6.5 start. You look at UCL, it's even crazier, and some majors have been changed to level3 upwards, especially social sciences, inexplicably IELTS used to be only 6.5, but now it has become four 7s. Who understands the family, this is a disguised persuasion.
However, in addition to eating the economy, Australia's current school application difficulty and entry threshold are all short-term dividends. Everyone is afraid of the high-intensity volume of the United Kingdom, and such a breakthrough is needed to transform. In fact, it is not only because of the United Kingdom roll, but also the surrounding Hong Kong three, new two, and bonus schools have been rolled up. It was only when it was Australia's turn that it began to become popular.
Do you say that Australia's ranking itself is very good, just because QS took off after a round of enhancement? There is a certain reason, but it is not the main reason, the core is still like the ninth school of United Kingdom, Hong Kong three, and everyone in the new second volume is depressed, so they change camps. It's the same with Hong Kong schools, where a bunch of domestic students go to the papers. After the rolling, there is naturally no oil and water, and many students have to think of a new track to break through. Australia is such a short-term buffer.
No.3 In terms of cost performance, in fact, United Kingdom and Australia still have an order
As a series of study abroad areas in the Commonwealth system, United Kingdom deserves nothing wrong with it, whether it is the atmosphere, the number of prestigious schools, and the fantasy of China's children in a developed country like Europe. These points are extremely attractive to Chinese students, after all, there are three terms a year, and you can play around the Schengen visa during holidays, and by the way, you can mix a 10-year US visa, and the appeal is definitely the highest.
Then the United Kingdom is too rolled, can only pass the heat to Hong Kong three, slope two, the early one is because of security issues, the later stage is because the ranking has also gone up, QS is interesting in the layout of these schools in the Asia-Pacific region.
These places are all rolled up, and the difficulty is already very high, so you have to find a new region to take over, Australia is. Do you think Australia can continue to explode for a long time? No, Tuao who refuses to give you an identity, and who is restricted, basically goes to mix up and comes back. The key is that the ranking has gone up, but the recognition has not come up, and this short-term momentum to the United Kingdom will also be a cooling-off period in a few years.
To sum up: in terms of cost performance, the entire market of international students has been observed for so long, and the core is mainly the most recognized two places, United States and Australia. Then there are Canada, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland. Those who go to the EU are all niche routes, and students who basically don't have much money go to the EU, and the tuition fee is cheap, and there may be scholarships or something.
The circle of studying abroad is very important, and the threshold is also very important, and many things in China have a threshold for beginners. Do you see that if you are studying in Malaysia, can you mix into the circle of studying in the UK and Australia, and if you can't get in, whether it is the later resource exchange or marriage, etc., there are two distinct paths.
Therefore, in terms of long-term value, studying in the United Kingdom is still more realistic, but now it is indeed rolling, the peak period, and it needs to cool down the heat. Let the difficulty of good schools be reduced, but from the perspective of long-term holding, the recognition trend of United Kingdom is greater than Australia, and it is also in terms of cost performance. Of course, from the perspective of staying, Tuao is still very good, but you can't stay. Unless you're like India, it's necessary for survival, but you're not, you're just a life choice.