分享兴趣，传播快乐，
增长见闻，留下美好。
亲爱的您，这里是LearingYard学苑！
今天小编为您带来期刊论文《考虑公平关切及其谈判破裂点的供应链运作》5 结束语。
欢迎您的访问！
Share interest, spread happiness,
increase knowledge, and leave beautiful.
Dear, this is the LearingYard Academy!
Today, the editor brings “ Conclusion of properties of important parameters of the journal article 《Supply chain operations considering fairness concerns and their negotiation rupture points》".
Welcome to visit!
内容摘要：Abstract
本期推文将从思维导图、精读内容、知识补充三个方面介绍期刊论文《考虑公平关切及其谈判破裂点的供应链运作》5 结束语。
This issue's tweet will introduce the journal article 《Supply chain operations considering fairness concerns and their negotiation rupture points》 from three aspects: mind mapping, detailed reading content, and supplementary knowledge, focusing on analysis of conclusion.
思维导图：Mind mapping
精读内容：Intensive reading content
在结论部分，作者主要介绍了研究内容、研究发现和研究展望。
In the conclusion section, the author primarily introduces the research content, findings, and future research directions.
首先作者简要介绍了研究内容，本文在考虑公平关切的供应链中，就批发价契约和回购契约分别展开研究与分析，并在无法协调的供应链中通过价格补贴的契约设计促成了协调。
First, the author briefly outlines the research content. This paper investigates and analyzes wholesale price contracts and buyback contracts within a supply chain considering fairness concerns. Furthermore, it proposes contract designs involving price subsidies to achieve coordination in uncoordinated supply chains.
其次作者介绍了研究发现。第一，谈判破裂点直接影响博弈双方的决策。 第二，基于 Stackelberg博弈模型，批发价为内生变量时，供应商对批发价的调节弱化了谈判破裂点的作用。第三，供应链成员的谈判破裂点提高均会削弱对方的利润占比，但供应链的效率却有不同的表现。第四，考虑谈判破裂点存在的公平关切供应链，均衡解均不能协调供应链，通过价格补贴进行契约设计后，供应链达到协调。
Secondly, the author presents the research findings. (1) The negotiation breakdown point directly impacts the decisions of both parties in the game. (2) Based on the Stackelberg game model, when the wholesale price is an endogenous variable, the supplier's adjustment of the wholesale price weakens the impact of the negotiation breakdown point. (3) An increase in the negotiation breakdown point for any supply chain member reduces the profit share of the other party, although the overall efficiency of the supply chain exhibits varying outcomes. (4) In a supply chain considering fairness concerns and the existence of a negotiation breakdown point, the equilibrium solution cannot coordinate the supply chain. However, through contract design with price subsidies, the supply chain can achieve coordination.
最后介绍了研究展望: 第一，在其他常见契约如: 收益共享契约、数量折扣契约中引入谈判破裂点，就供应链的决策和协调进行讨论; 第二，还可考虑通过其他的外在因素以驱动合理的利润分配促进契约协调; 第三，可将供应链结构拓展至一个零售商( 供应商) 对多个供应商( 零售商) 甚至多个供应商对多个零售商的情况，使其更加符合现实。
Finally, the author discusses future research directions: (1) Introducing the negotiation breakdown point into other common contracts, such as revenue-sharing contracts and quantity discount contracts, to explore decision-making and coordination within the supply chain. (2) Considering other external factors that can drive reasonable profit distribution to promote contract coordination. (3) Expanding the supply chain structure to include scenarios with one retailer (supplier) dealing with multiple suppliers (retailers), or even multiple suppliers dealing with multiple retailers, to better reflect real-world conditions.
知识补充：Knowledge supplement
1、数量折扣契约和数量弹性契约 Quantity discount contracts and quantity flexibility contracts
数量折扣又称批量作价。这是企业对大量购买产品的顾客给予的一种减价优惠。一般购买量越多，折扣也越大，以鼓励顾客增加购买量，或集中向一家企业购买，或提前购买。数量折扣又可分为累计数量折扣和一次性数量折扣两种类型。
Quantity discount, also known as bulk pricing, is a price reduction given by companies to customers who purchase large quantities of a product. Generally, the larger the purchase volume, the greater the discount, encouraging customers to buy more, purchase exclusively from one company, or buy in advance. Quantity discounts can be divided into two types: cumulative quantity discounts and one-time quantity discounts.
数量弹性契约是指零售商的实际订货量可以在其提前提交的订货量基础上进行一定范围内的变动，零售商在对下一个错售周期进行预测之后，提供给供应商一个订货量，供应商以此为基数组织生产，零售商在获得了确定的市场需求之后，只能在供应商所允许的范围之内确定最后的实际订货量，无论最后市场的需求是超过还是低于零售商的预测。此时零售商和供应商共同承担市场风险。
Quantity flexibility contracts allow the retailer's actual order quantity to vary within a certain range based on the order quantity submitted in advance. After forecasting the demand for the next selling cycle, the retailer provides an order quantity to the supplier, who then organizes production based on this quantity. Once the retailer has obtained confirmed market demand, the final actual order quantity can only be determined within the range allowed by the supplier, regardless of whether the final market demand exceeds or falls short of the retailer's forecast. In this scenario, both the retailer and the supplier share the market risk.
今天的分享就到这里了。
如果您对今天的文章有独特的想法，
欢迎给我们留言，
让我们相约明天。
祝您今天过得开心快乐！
That's all for today's sharing.
If you have a unique idea about the article,
please leave us a message,
and let us meet tomorrow.
I wish you a nice day!
参考资料：ChatGPT、百度
本文由LearningYard学苑整理并发出，如有侵权请联系删除。
参考文献：[1] 聂腾飞, 何碧玉, 杜少甫. 考虑公平关切及其谈判破裂点的供应链运作 [J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(10): 92-102.
文案|Whisper
排版|Whisper
审核|Wang