Photo/Saudi Arabia tells interesting facts
Editor/Saudi Fun Story
Preface
Jiang Ping participated in the Ali competition as a secondary school student and unexpectedly stood out with a score of 12th, which made her stand out from a group of masters, and there was a voice of shock and praise on the Internet. Some netizens began to question Jiang Ping's results, and even 39 students jointly asked for her competition papers to be made public. These signs suggest that Jiang Ping's affair may soon have an ending.
The final situation was exposed, and the Damo Academy revised Jiang Ping's interview video
In this final, one of the contestants revealed an important detail: he said that he only completed one more question and turned in the paper. He was surprised by the difficulty of the whole paper, and felt that the content covered in the paper was completely different from what he had been exposed to before. The revelation seemed to provide a basis for speculation, and people began to wonder if Jiang Ping's performance was normal.
They believe that Jiang Ping was able to achieve such an excellent result, even if the other contestants only completed one question, it is unbelievable because the difficulty of the test paper is beyond expectations. The public is generally skeptical of this "counterattack", believing that this kind of results are unfair and cannot represent the level and fairness of the entire mathematics competition.
Alibaba was bewildered by the barrage of skepticism and didn't know how to respond to the situation. All while keeping the game clear and transparent. Despite their efforts, they seem unable to meet public expectations or put an end to the controversy. As a result, they unexpectedly made changes to Jiang Ping's original interview video. Both the video cover and the content have been tweaked. The words "math genius secondary school girl" on the original cover disappeared and was replaced by "out-of-the-ordinary life".
Perhaps, in Ali's concept, only through a high-profile way can the public support be gained and become the focus. The public began to speculate whether Ali's move was unusual, and even questioned whether there might be other promoters behind it, not just Jiang Ping.
These changes focus on two main areas: the first is the change of the video cover. The previous cover slogan was "Mathematics Genius Secondary School Girl", but now these words are missing, and they are replaced by "Out of Character Life". This change is quite intriguing. Why did you remove the "math genius" review? Could it be that their evaluation of Jiang Ping has changed?
Secondary school girls stand out
Jiang Ping was not admitted to high school because she was biased, when she was in junior high school at a school in the town, she scored 621 points, which was enough to enter a good high school, and her family conditions were not good. The math competition is like a grand event in the kingdom of mathematics, bringing together masters from all walks of life, who gather like a cloud, setting off a storm of wisdom every year, and making countless math enthusiasts pay attention to it.
In this grand event of mathematics, Jiang Ping, a secondary school student, is like an unknown man who accidentally broke in, with a passion for mathematics, and resolutely stepped on this radiant stage. Although she did not have the support of a prestigious university, she did not receive systematic special training in "mathematical martial arts". Jiang Ping's 12th place in the preliminaries is like a mathematical version of "grassroots counterattack".
This achievement not only sparked a wave of widespread discussion on the Internet, but also caused layers of exciting ripples like a pebble thrown on the surface of a lake. After the results of the competition were announced, some began to question her results. Especially after the finals, 39 contestants jointly questioned the organizing committee of the competition and asked for an investigation of Jiang Ping's results. They believe that if Jiang Ping's results are indeed problematic, it will not only be unfair to her, but also unfair to the other contestants.
Jiang Ping's results were questioned, and 39 players jointly signed a letter
In the center of the stage, 39 warrior contestants shouted in unison: "We want the truth and uncover the secret of Jiang Ping's achievements!" "It's not a rash move, these 39 hearts are like 39 spotlights, casting light into every corner of the game, revealing its dark side. This scene is like a reasoning drama of "the only truth", and the audience's gossip spirit was instantly ignited, and they speculated: maybe it was the counterattack of the hidden master, or the tragedy of the system's miscalculation, and some people even fantasized about a shocking reversal.
In this mathematics competition, Jiang Ping's participation has aroused widespread discussion among netizens, although it is not uncommon for players to counterattack in mathematics competitions. However, after the joint event, netizens seemed to suddenly notice something unusual. It turned out that Jiang Ping, as a secondary school student, actually represented a school without a high school to participate in a global mathematics competition, which aroused public doubts and speculation.
Netizens questioned Jiang Ping's appearance, believing that her identity was not normal, so they launched a joint campaign, hoping to have a deeper understanding of Jiang Ping's background. In this way, you can ensure the fairness of the competition and avoid unnecessary disputes. Surprisingly, however, the co-branded campaign did not receive a wide response, but instead attracted Alibaba's attention. They chose to investigate Jiang Ping's situation and ignore the situation of the other contestants.
The focus of the letter was on several obvious mistakes made by Jiang Ping in the process of solving the problem, which attracted the attention of the bigwigs in the mathematics world. Although Jiang Ping is considered an expert in the field of mathematics, she makes mistakes on the blackboard. These mistakes make people wonder if she really understands the essence of the problem.
Alibaba's approach may be motivated by the protection of each contestant, and hopefully it will not affect them too much. However, in the eyes of the public, this practice may seem unfair, because Jiang Ping is the only one who has been selected, and the situation of the other contestants is not known, which does not guarantee the fairness of the competition.
This situation may further spark public controversy and raise greater doubts about the authenticity of Jiang's counterattack. Therefore, this joint event may once again spark widespread discussion and controversy. Overall, this story reflects society's concern about fair play and counterattack, as well as questions and concerns about the enforcement of competition rules. Jiang Ping's case has come into focus, triggering deep thinking about education and social equity.
conclusion
In the in-depth development of the Jiang Ping incident, a contestant who participated in a mathematics competition revealed the situation of the competition. The Damo Academy has tampered with the interview video. This exposure has sparked widespread public questioning and discussion about the actions of the Damo Academy. The incident once again highlighted the complex relationship between media and power, and the importance of the authenticity of information. In the information age, there is a growing public demand for authenticity and transparency, and any form of tampering and disguise can lead to serious consequences.