Liangshan sold miserably and caused controversy, and directed and acted in tricks. Internet celebrities make up stories to attract attention, and they have a hand in grasping traffic hype. It seems to be moving but deceitful, and you should be careful with a few tricks. Who pays for the posing and fake?
Is the routine deep? There is a set of self-directed and self-acting cheats money!
Recently, all kinds of self-directed and self-acting fake videos have been on the Internet, and people are dazzled and dizzy.
Some pretend to be pitiful and sell misery to gain sympathy, some fabricate "family conflicts" to make things, and some rely on "illegal detention" to attract attention. These so-called "Internet celebrities", in order to earn that bit of traffic, are really racking their brains and doing everything!
Routine 1: Sell miserable and sympathize, pretend to be pitiful and cheat rewards
In order to deceive attention, some bloggers interpret the word "miserable" to the fullest. What "Liangshan XX", "Zhao XX" and the like, crying and crying all day long, Chu Chu pitifully told netizens how miserable they were, as if they were the most pitiful in the world. As everyone knows, people who really need help are often unknown, and most of these people who shout for help all day long are "professional beggars".
In real life, which of us is not a little unsatisfactory? Low wages, high mortgages, and expensive children's education...... But don't most people just grit their teeth and persevere? How can they be like these Internet celebrities, who cry at every turn and call their fathers and mothers, and those who don't know think they are living in dire straits!
Routine 2: Deduce tragic plots and fabricate family conflicts
There are also some "masters" who are even more unique, and simply direct and act in a big play. What kind of "forced blind date", "illegal detention", the plot twists and turns, and the climax, are even more exciting than TV series! It's a pity that behind these "big dramas" is just a clumsy performance by a group of unscrupulous Internet celebrities in order to earn traffic.
Isn't it good for us ordinary people to have a dull life? Do these people think that the audience is stupid and can cheat money by making up some bloody plots? As everyone knows, today's netizens are all sharp-eyed, and your little tricks have long been seen through!
Routine 3: Challenge the moral bottom line and create social antagonism
What's more, in order to attract people's attention, they do not hesitate to challenge public order and good customs and create social antagonism. **Under the banner of "subverting cognition", these people are actually deliberately inciting emotions and stirring up contradictions. Their actions not only infringe on the rights and interests of others, but also challenge the bottom line of the law.
Why are you doing all this mess now? Isn't it good for everyone to be harmonious and help each other? It has to make the chickens and dogs restless and smoky. These people, their conscience is really eaten by dogs!
Routine 4: Inciting emotions to gamble on traffic and using public emotions for profit
To put it bluntly, the routine of these influencers is to exploit the public's sympathy and curiosity to make a profit. They know the tricks of the "eyeball economy" and what kind of content attracts people's attention the most, so they go to great lengths to make up stories and use people's emotions to achieve their own ends.
The wretched will have something to hate. These people exploit the public's goodwill and compassion for personal gain, and it is truly hateful! Their actions not only deceive the public's feelings, but also hurt those who really need help.
Appeal: Strengthen supervision and strike hard
For this kind of self-directing, self-acting, posing and falsifying, the relevant departments must strike hard, and must not tolerate adultery. **It is necessary to increase the punishment and make these unscrupulous Internet celebrities pay the due price to set an example. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen the supervision of online platforms, urge them to fulfill their responsibilities, and do not give these counterfeiters a chance.
As ordinary netizens, we must also keep our eyes open, be vigilant, and not be easily deceived by these false contents. When encountering suspicious situations, question more, do not be gullible or disseminated, and jointly maintain a clear cyberspace.
So in the end, the editor would like to ask: In the face of these self-directed and self-acting tricks, have you ever been deceived? What do you think about this?