Working at height on the 30th floor is inherently very dangerous, but some people are not only extremely selfish, but also disregard the safety of other people's lives.
Recently, there was such a scene in Chongqing, where workers were working at height on the exterior wall of the 32nd floor, and the safety rope was cut by the owner of the roof, and the exposure of the incident caused many netizens to be angry.
Loading...
The event passed
The incident occurred on June 30 in a residential area in Chongqing, where four workers were arranged to repair the building because the tiles on the exterior wall had fallen off.
Because they had to find a safety rope fixing point on the roof, the staff went to the roof, but in the process of construction, some damage was caused to the plants in the owner's garden on the top floor, so the owner was dissatisfied, and the male owner cut the worker's safety rope.
Is the roof of the building his? No, but the owner occupied the roof of the building to build a garden, and used the roof as his own site, which was already illegal.
When the 4 workers were working with a safety rope, there was a safety officer on the roof of the building, but the owner and his wife did not listen to the persuasion and kept arguing with the safety officer. The landlady said that the staff broke into her home for no reason.
The security officer said "it's not your home, the roof is a public place", but the owners don't think so, they think that the roof is their own home, and on the roof is to break into their own home. Then the male owner came over with a shovel and cut the safety rope into three sections, disregarding the safety of the workers.
Fortunately, the workers at that time used the double rope method, otherwise they would fall from the 32nd floor, a height of about 110 meters, the consequences are unimaginable, 4 lives! Many netizens angrily said that the owner was a deliberate murder.
There was really no way, so the security officer had to call the police while stopping it, and after the police came to the scene, they mediated between the two parties. According to the report, the owner realized his mistake and the two parties have reconciled.
The handling method caused dissatisfaction among netizens
The owner's actions did not care for the safety of others, and if it were not for the double-rope operation, it is estimated that the workers would have suffered. Although a settlement was reached in the end, netizens thought that this way of dealing with it was really rough, how could such a thing be reconciled? The comment area was full of criticism of the owner's alleged crime.
Netizens believe that the private construction of the garden in the public area on the roof is an illegal construction, and the owner's behavior of cutting the safety rope is an attempt by the S person, and it cannot be reconciled like this. And the "uncle" handled this matter in this way was also questioned by netizens, and the cost of crime was too low.
Seriously, if there were no staff watching from the rooftop, it is estimated that all the ropes would probably be cut, and the workers would have to resign themselves to their fate.
Finally, I would like to say
The roof of the building does belong to the public area, and the garden may be built without permission, but I didn't expect them to really think it as their own, and when they got to the roof, they said that they broke into his house, which was really amazing.
As for the act of cutting the safety rope, it is really disregarding the lives of others, if it is not for the double rope operation, who can be responsible for the lives of the 4 workers? What netizens said about the suspicion of conspiracy S is not unreasonable.
And the way to deal with it in the end turned out to be reconciliation, just a little bit 4 for the workers to die whine, simple reconciliation is indeed a little incomprehensible, such people deserve to be punished.