In the vast river of history, we always love to pursue those stories that have been sealed by the dust, especially those chapters about the origin of civilization, which are even more fascinating. When it comes to the beginning of Chinese history, most people will naturally think of the Xia Dynasty, the country established after the legendary "Dayu ruled the waters", which is regarded as the first dynasty of Chinese civilization. But today, let's embark on an extraordinary journey to explore a more profound question: whether there were even more ancient dynasties hidden before the Xia dynasty.
Yes, especially in the early dynasties, there are still many academic controversies, and there are many controversies about the division of dynasties, the order of kings, succession, etc., which are more fully proven.
The key person, Manito, has not explained what the definition of a dynasty is, so what's the matter with casually buttoning people's hats? Egyptology does not believe in any "history book" or in the fact that non-written material remains can reveal all information.
Many people still don't know what the ancient Egyptian dynasty was all about, and they don't know how Egypt scholars did this work. They either exaggerate the role of Maneto Egypt history, or they exaggerate the role of archaeology (non-written material remains), they don't know that the materials they read write these questions very simply, not because they are really simple, but because the materials themselves are not deep, take care of the so-called popularity, and write deeply for fear of not being able to understand.
Because of this dark history of Egypt, I now only need to see the reconstruction of "political history" (whether this history is recorded in the annals or not) entirely on archaeological physical materials
Or it would be embarrassing to attach ancient documents through non-literal material remains, and biblical archaeology with the fictional literature of the Middle Kingdom attached to the Bible Exodus of Egypt seems absurd enough to me.
The Yellow Emperor's name is Xuanyuan, which always makes people feel strange. Xuanyuan should be the product of the development of wood, so the tribe known for Xuanyuan must have appeared relatively late. Furthermore, Gongsun means the grandson of a certain Gong, so who is this Gong?
Therefore, I guess that Gongsun Xuanyuan must have risen later, and it should be the Longshan era. Before that, there was the Chao clan, and although the Suiren clan is a legend, it seems to have been handed down from ancient history.
Fuxi Nuwa sounds like a myth, but it is more like something with a mythological color at the beginning of civilization, probably the Yangshao period. As for Yao Shun, it is estimated that he is a person in history.
I wonder if the era of "Zen Rang" ever appeared on a large scale, and I personally don't think it makes sense.
On the contrary, the classical view of history since the Eastern Zhou Dynasty has only continued to name and name specific generations of Zen, which is more like a "condensed" abbreviated record of distant ancient history. The real Chan system may be more complete and complex than in the pre-Qin classics, and the evolution from the Chan "public world" to the hereditary "family world" may also be very long and gradual. For example, the "family Zen" conjecture you mentioned may be a transitional form.
Liangzhu's group is indeed a bit distinct, like Zhaoling Mountain, Zhangling Mountain, Fuquan Mountain, Sidun, Gaochengdun...... There is a clear difference, the tomb jade of the temple pier and the ancient city of Liangzhu, there is an obvious difference between the proportion of jade and jade, and Fuquan Mountain has unearthed ivory scepter, uncut complete or cut jade.
The Yaoshan Altar and the Anti-Mountain Cemetery happen to have a "city-building" division, and it can be seen that "rights" have also been turned over several times in this culture, and even divided.
What do you think about this, see you in the comment area