laitimes

Attention, there is a hidden traitor among the workers - I was taught a lesson by the judge

Attention, there is a hidden traitor among the workers - I was taught a lesson by the judge

The source of the story is an enforcement that the individual undertakes. After chatting with the executive judge for a while, he smiled and asked me, Lawyer Yang, do you think this is likely to be a bureau? This store manager is likely to be a pawn arranged by the other party?

Originally, I think that the high-end business war in reality is also the law of the jungle, for example, when listed companies are dangdang, their way of business war is the most primitive seal grabbing, then, companies with lower levels than them, especially ordinary limited liability companies, companies that are not listed, and there is no sassy routine, after all, there is absolutely no shortage of smart people around the shareholders of listed companies. In addition, I have also seen disputes between several law firms that are not small, and the stage is also a bridge of grabbing the official seal. Those plots that are poisoned slowly, planted nails long in advance, and prepared for their own people should only exist in novels and ultra-high-end business wars. My total amount adds up to definitely less than 2 million for this trivial matter, what high-end operation will there be? ?

The case was a mediocre enforcement case of arrears of wages, and a showdown with the judge, because I represented more than one worker who was owed wages, and the vast majority of employees mediated, and I also applied on my behalf, knowing that the court could not actually enforce it.

When I talked to the judge about the situation, I complained about the strange behavior of the store manager at the time.

At that time, when the store manager was in labor arbitration, every time the arbitrator said a word, the store manager immediately interrupted to say two sentences, and the arbitrator said another word, and the store manager continued to interrupt, at least two words, and the arbitration could not continue normally, and he also threatened to call the police if the labor arbitration did not let the unit pay money immediately. Finally, during arbitration, the arbitrator especially helps the unit and presses the employee to mediate. The amount of money in favor of the arbitral award was obviously too low, and it was not changed until the court finally changed it. Later, when it was executed (I didn't ask at the time of arbitration), I knew that the boss had other shops that were open.

The judge sent out a soul torture question: This boss has other stores, why doesn't he go to the boss's other stores to make trouble, but to make trouble with the arbitrator, is this store manager and the boss colluded, make trouble on the arbitration side, and don't let others arbitrate well, in fact, it is very possible, the boss of the money and him have already arranged, and the work position has also been arranged? Lawyer Yang, do you think this is likely to be a bureau? This store manager is likely to be a pawn arranged by the company?

I recalled: he was the most violent at the time, but it seems that he was the first to agree to mediate. Others saw that the one who made the most trouble was compromised and mediated, and they also followed the compromise and mediation. In fact, the vast majority of them were mediated at that time, and the amount of the mediation money was a little more than the arrears of wages. In fact, if the employee leaves because the employer has not signed a labor contract and the employee is in arrears of wages, in fact, according to the law, there will definitely be more than the arrears of wages in the end. This is almost ten times more enforceable than mediation, mainly because the labor contract is not signed, and the difference is nearly a year of double wages. The difference for each employee alone may not be much, but counting the number of people, the difference in the total amount may be millions.

Well, the master is in the folk. I thought about it and agreed with the judge's guess that it was a bureau. It's a good trick to hide from the world.

In reality, labor arbitration is actually a case of mud + mud, and the arbitrator in this case took the initiative to help the unit, because the employee was not only the one who made the most trouble, but also the entire collective of employees who were owed wages, which affected his normal work. Does the arbitrator know that the hard award salary is less? It should be known, otherwise the final mediation plan will not be given during the mediation, and the final mediation plan will be added on the basis of the arrears of wages, because the general mediation will give in the amount of money in exchange for giving money early. This mediation scheme is not a discount on unpaid wages.

Although the store manager is at the forefront of the charge, it seems that he is helping his old colleagues to defend their rights together, but in fact what he is doing is to disrupt the order of arbitration, affect its normal progress, anger the arbitrators, and make the arbitrators unconsciously biased towards the side of the enterprise. In the end, he took the lead in compromise. Let other employees also compromise, so as to achieve the goal of the enterprise to bear as little cost as possible in the labor rights protection of employees.

Finally, do you think this is actually a game?

Attention, there is a hidden traitor among the workers - I was taught a lesson by the judge
Attention, there is a hidden traitor among the workers - I was taught a lesson by the judge